Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP Group: Sarah Palin IS Qualified to Serve in White House
The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama ^ | 07/29/12 | Lloyd Marcus

Posted on 07/29/2012 7:05:08 PM PDT by Impeach98

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE - JULY 29, 2012
CONTACT: Ryan Gill at press@CampaignToDefeatObama.com or (650) 678-7732

Palin's Qualifications to Serve in White House Should Not Be Questioned

Lloyd Marcus, the Chairman of leading conservative group Campaign to Defeat Obama PAC released the following statement today in response to an ABC news report that former Vice President Dick Cheney criticized Sarah Palin’s qualifications to serve in the White House:

“To suggest that Sarah Palin does not possess the necessary qualifications to serve in the White House is ridiculous on its face. Ever since she was selected in 2008 by the Republican party’s nominee for president, then ratified by the GOP membership at the Republican Party convention, she has proven time and time again to be an extremely capable, inspiring and visionary leader.

“Palin has proven her mettle in the years since 2008. She has become one of the most prominent and vocal leaders of the tea party movement, and her campaign efforts have single-handedly influenced the outcome of countless senatorial, congressional and gubernatorial elections because the American people believe in her leadership skills and trust her judgment. They know that she knows a great leader when she sees one because she herself is a great leader.

“Contrast that with the disastrous record Barack Obama has compiled since 2008. Obama has failed the people of this nation and brought harm to our economy, national defense and the American spirit.

Campaign to Defeat Obama Vice Chair Andrea Shea King concluded:

“Sarah Palin will never be the safe choice of the GOP establishment blue bloods.

"In bucking the ‘good old boys’ throughout her entire career and proving that she could rack up accomplishments and make big differences -- as both an executive in office and a citizen activist and Tea Party leader -- she has proven she is more valuable than the whole lot of them.

"Sarah Palin’s record and leadership abilities speak for themselves and anybody would do better to emulate them than to marginalize themselves by taking swipes at her.”

“ The Left and their allies in the media will always try to personally malign conservatives for their own political purposes, but it is our responsibility to not only prevent ourselves from being sucked into these tricks and giving credence to these baseless attacks, but also to proactively fight back. This proud American conservative will not stand for these despicable sneering smears against Sarah Palin, and no conservative should.”

See the report online here: http://shout.lt/bTUz


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cheney; dick; dickcheney; gope; lloydmarcus; palin; palin2012; sarah; waronsarah
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-97 last
To: Impeach98

I thought his daughter said she was.


51 posted on 07/29/2012 10:31:05 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Not in my book. Besides her background in Alaska (which is not as stellar as is sold here), when she quit her job to become a national player, that was the first strike. When she backed RINOS like Carly Fiorina, Juan McCain, Orrin Hatch, Pam Bondi, and Karen Handel, that was the second strike. When she decided to grandstand for a living instead of studying historic, regulatory, and economic background information to qualify for that office (as Reagan did), that was it for me. It demonstrated that she had no intent to do the homework to be truly qualified to be CIC.


52 posted on 07/29/2012 10:55:05 PM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

bookmarking for later


53 posted on 07/29/2012 10:59:18 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (Pray for America. She is the world's last best hope for freedom. May it not be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I share your disappointment that Sarah isn’t running. However, I’m sure she carefully prayed about her decision before making it.

I’m disgusted with the GOPE, and that goes for that Michael Savage who basically said the same thing as Cheney. He goes so far as to all her “Mush, Mush.” Maybe I will start calling him “lush, lush.” Seems to me he has a drinking problem.

I’m sick of these blue bloods and their attacks on Sarah. However, I have one consolation, and I will quote the Bible - “touch NOT mine anointed, and do my prophets no harm.”

I’m not saying Sarah is a prophet - just that she is a child of God and He will fight her battles for her. And, those who oppose and speak evil of his children will also be brought to task. Vengeance is mine, and I will repay - saith the Lord.


54 posted on 07/29/2012 11:21:49 PM PDT by Catsrus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

I’m a realist and don’t expect group-think out of anyone, but Cheney should know better.

He may as well have said Sarah has no gravitas.


55 posted on 07/30/2012 12:44:50 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (Boston's mayor is anti-Christian and anti-free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
You bring up some fair points as it relates to whether she'd be a good standard-bearer for conservatism, and some good points as to whether she did what was needed to be a good CIC.

I can tell you that since 2008 she DID put in efforts to become more informed and engaged on many of the key issues of the day, and had a staff that worked to keep her informed and able to speak on some of the big issues of the day, and some of the complexities associated with them.

I too share your frustration with some of her endorsements (as you said John McCain and Orrin Hatch especially), but it's not fair to not also cite the dozens of other GREAT endorsements she made and the impact she had in helping anti-establishment candidates overcome their establishment opponents.

I understand we disagree on the larger point of whether she is well-suited for the White House (I believe she is and you believe she is not), however, she has a better track record of experience and a better perspective and understanding on the fundamentals of how/why this nation was founded and the thinking of our Founding Fathers than the current president - there's no comparison.

56 posted on 07/30/2012 12:49:56 AM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

We’re less than 100 days out - it’s not going to happen.

I do believe Sarah should have a cabinet position, but I doubt that’s going to happen either.


57 posted on 07/30/2012 12:49:56 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (Boston's mayor is anti-Christian and anti-free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: cableguymn

“Sadly, it’s starting to affect his thinking.”

Anti-rejection meds do affect your thinking.


58 posted on 07/30/2012 12:58:15 AM PDT by Heart of Georgia (Boston's mayor is anti-Christian and anti-free speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: IronJack
Sarah Palin's credentials to serve as the nation's chief executive are at least as good as a thousand times squared, Barack Obama's pathetic, street hood 'skilz'.

Please don't even suggest that Obama is anywhere near Sarah Palin's league.

59 posted on 07/30/2012 12:59:50 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
Mitt could be tapped for the Palin cabinet.

Love it. You've correctly positioned those two people, although I doubt that Palin would find any need for a documented liberal on her cabinet.

60 posted on 07/30/2012 1:03:12 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: onyx
NO! Not Sarah again. TOP of the TICKET ONLY for her.

Amen, sister. Sarah was the first to say that she'd never run as a VP candidate again. It's in her book.

61 posted on 07/30/2012 1:05:58 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: imemyself
She’s too polarizing.

A lot of Freepers just put you on their 'watch' list, with that comment. Not a threat - just a fact.

Little hint....if you want to blend in, you'll have to learn to speak like a real conservative.

62 posted on 07/30/2012 1:18:11 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
I understand we disagree on the larger point of whether she is well-suited for the White House (I believe she is and you believe she is not), however, she has a better track record of experience and a better perspective and understanding on the fundamentals of how/why this nation was founded and the thinking of our Founding Fathers than the current president - there's no comparison.

Comparing her to a treasonous incompetent doesn't render her qualified, at least by my standards. Any such metric is subjective anyway.

I hold military CIC as a high fraction of presidential responsibilities. I'm with Patton there, especially as regards having read the classics in many fields by which to understand the context of the present. One simply cannot understand the guy across the table with whom one is negotiating or across the battlefield without knowing his country's history.

One simply cannot understand what is wrong with regulation of manufacturing without having learned how manufacturing works. Look at how Reagan traveled the country to learn exactly that. Look at how he studied Montesquieu, or Locke.

Reagan was nobody's "amiable dunce" because he had done his homework for years with his feet in many a manufacturing plant, and DID NOT rely upon his advisers to tell him what to think (think "tear down this wall," which his advisers tried to cut from the speech). Such is exactly my criticism of her in that I believe the RINOs think they can lead her down the primrose path with a clauqe of whispering "experts." She just hasn't done that background work with which to develop an appropriate ground of skepticism.

Simply quoting Hayek doesn't mean one has grasped Hayek, or any other pivotal philosopher. For example, I'm reading up on Titus Lucretius Carus. Why, is he obscure. Well, to the philosophers who were informing the founders of this country, absolutely not; he was pivotal. I simply see no sign of that kind of curiosity in Sarah Palin in any field.

63 posted on 07/30/2012 1:26:28 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
If she were the nominee, the grassroots would explode with such enthusiasm.

The election would be a blow out. Palin won't be bought off and the insiders know it.

The country needs her, not a liberal like Romney ..

If she had been a man; the Gop-e would had tied themselves to that (like they are doing with Rubio) ..Jealously in the media that she has the brains to govern, has a great family, a moral compass that guides her (being pretty, sends them into orbit) We like her for being real.

64 posted on 07/30/2012 2:03:06 AM PDT by Christie at the beach (I like Newt and would love to see political dead bodies on the floor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carry_Okie
"I simply see no sign of that kind of curiosity in Sarah Palin in any field."

I can think of one off the top of my head right away: energy policy.

I can think of a second which is her passion for the right to life and how it was reflected not in her religious and personal views but how readily she embraced motherhood to a child with Down's Syndrome and became an advocate for parents of children with special needs.

In both of these areas, her curiosity and passions were real and from within.

65 posted on 07/30/2012 2:03:27 AM PDT by Impeach98 (Anti-war protestors should try holding rallies in Damascus and Tehran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

From your lips to God’s ear, but how do you figure Mitt will be dumped and replaced?


66 posted on 07/30/2012 2:18:35 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Natural Born Citizen - born in the USA of citizen parents.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

‘Wait...Watch...and LEARN!’
—George HW Bush

‘You Betcha!’
—Sarah Palin


67 posted on 07/30/2012 2:46:54 AM PDT by bigoil (Study Thy Nixon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: GregB

Hi GB!

Probably! I wonder if he lives out that way?


68 posted on 07/30/2012 3:06:31 AM PDT by sneakers (Go Sheriff Joe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

“Palin will end up as the GOP nominee. You heard it here first. The GOP-e is preparing to dump Mitt. Watch for it.”

May I recommend a large (64oz.) glass of reality.


69 posted on 07/30/2012 5:07:38 AM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“Wake up and get real. Palin, as much as I love her, and wish she were our candidate, IS NOT GOING TO BE THE ONE GETTING THE NOD THIS YEAR!”

That’s the problem with newbies like you, you don’t really know us REAL conservatives think. :-)


70 posted on 07/30/2012 5:12:47 AM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion
THEY are the ones who need moderating NOT us, we have made too may retreats and too many compromises with the Progressives in the GOP, and look what that has brought us, Ubama, and no force of will to stand up to him.

Zact'ly. Moderates flap their gums about compromise, acceptable candidates, and electable candidates but they themselves will hand a race to the democrats before they'll vote for a conservative. And then they'll turn around and blame the conservatives for losing the race that they refused to vote in or even voted for the democrat.

They're still pointing to Goldwater's landslide defeat as an example but the reality is that they themselves engineered that defeat because moderates like George Romney refused to support Goldwater.

The fact is that the GOP now has a candidate to the left of Bill Clinton and the broken glass republicans are happily destroying the country right along with the left.
71 posted on 07/30/2012 5:34:36 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
That is what bugs me about the Goldwater defeat, that was 50 years ago. Not to mention we have Reagen's 2 truly impressive victories in the 80's.

But you are right when you say that Moderates are the purist bloc of them all, they won't vote for ANYONE, unless they agree with them, on all things.

Willing Blind Fools I say.

72 posted on 07/30/2012 5:52:58 AM PDT by KC_Lion (No more Grand Old Progressives! Vote Conservative-Libertarian-Tea Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98

Re fight to life and energy, passion yes, curiosity and intelligence, no.


73 posted on 07/30/2012 6:34:39 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The Slave Party Switcheroo: Economic crisis! Zero's eligibility Trumped!! Hillary 2012!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

I (totally) agree.

Romney / Palin.


74 posted on 07/30/2012 6:39:31 AM PDT by Cringing Negativism Network (America doesn't need any new laws. America needs freedom!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Palin ping.


75 posted on 07/30/2012 6:44:31 AM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt; the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

We’re so busy fighting the democrats that we’re losing the war badly. We see it all the time. Conservatives blaming democrats for things that have been going on for decades (even when the GOP was in control) and then screaming that we’ve got to elect republicans no matter how bad they are even if they’ll continue doing the liberal thing.

In this thread about energy independence it doesn’t take long for someone to come running to declare that Mitt St Jesus will save us from the EPA and it will be boomtimes in the energy industry. Obama doesn’t help matters much but he sure as hell didn’t start this decades old decline and Romney isn’t about to stop it.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2912323/posts


76 posted on 07/30/2012 7:08:21 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
http://www.ldjackson.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/03/demreps.jpg

Its Funny, Dems have to Campaign as Conservatives (I saw an ad for Claire McCaskil and she sounded like she wanted to be the second coming of Goldwater, but I know it is all lies)

And Repubs think they have to be liberals to win elections, when in truth that costs them more elections than I can count-2008,1996, the Congressional elections of 2006 etc etc.

77 posted on 07/30/2012 7:54:38 AM PDT by KC_Lion (No more Grand Old Progressives! Vote Conservative-Libertarian-Tea Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98; All

Cheney really needs to ask himself: “Self. How many Republicans in ‘08 cast their votes for Sarah Palin OVER McCain, because McCain, in their minds, was a certain loser?”

I think he’s be shocked by the answer.


78 posted on 07/30/2012 7:56:27 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Resident FReeper Kitty Poem /Haiku Guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Impeach98
Pssst Sarah. It would be a MISTAKE to go hunting with Dick Cheney.
79 posted on 07/30/2012 8:02:48 AM PDT by shove_it (purge pandering progressive parasites)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Artcore

Oh Sarah...why oh why didn’t you run??

Death threats against her, her children, her extended family. There are more than enough Bill Ayers types on the left to carry out such threats.


80 posted on 07/30/2012 8:38:04 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Valin

I don’t think that is large enough..

Might I suggest we give them the 5 gallon pail full?


81 posted on 07/30/2012 8:39:04 AM PDT by cableguymn (For the first time in my life. I fear my country's government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Windflier

Mitt could be tapped for the Palin cabinet.

Use Mitt as a negative kitchen cabinet advisor. Anything he is for she should probably be against.


82 posted on 07/30/2012 9:08:19 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
Palin will end up as the GOP nominee. You heard it here first. The GOP-e is preparing to dump Mitt. Watch for it.

If I were a DU'er, I would start a feature called "FReeper Funnies" and lead off with this post.

83 posted on 07/30/2012 9:20:48 AM PDT by Notary Sojac (Ut veniant omnes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

The GOP-e is preparing to dump Mitt.

Romney has been running hard for four years to become president. He has had both staff and surrogates attack his opponent viciously. He has used the tactics of back stabbing and paid mouthpieces. He might stand a chance of winning if he would use those tactics against Obama instead of Palin.


84 posted on 07/30/2012 9:25:38 AM PDT by W. W. SMITH (Maybe the horse (RNC) will learn to sing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Valin

NEWBIE????

ROTFLMAO

Put down the bong my friend.


85 posted on 07/30/2012 9:50:10 AM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark

I linked this article to the ping on Liz Cheney’s Twttier thread. I hope that suffices.


86 posted on 07/30/2012 10:08:24 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
The GOP-e is preparing to dump Mitt.


87 posted on 07/30/2012 10:12:21 AM PDT by Old Sarge (We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sneakers
a Palin/West ticket would be powerful.

Palin has been Alinsky'ed out of relevance.

West wants Justice For Trayvon©.

Thanks for playing.

88 posted on 07/30/2012 10:18:30 AM PDT by Old Sarge (We are now officially over the precipice, we just havent struck the ground yet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst

That’s the first scenario I’ve seen described that actually has a chance of occurring although a slim chance.

Unfortunately, it requires Ann Romney fall ill, so I can’t even pray it would occur.


89 posted on 07/30/2012 11:17:15 AM PDT by FourtySeven (47)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tet68

“Her credentials certainly equal those of the junior Senator
from Ill...”

A point well taken tet. Might I add that Palin’s level of experience exceeds that of Obama by orders of magnitude. In real positions of responsibility.

As I understand it there are no qualificational requirements for President except recieving the requisite number of votes in the Electorial College.


90 posted on 07/30/2012 12:01:41 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
I'm all for Sarah Palin being the Republican nominee for President ... and it might happen if Romney doesn't win on the first ballot.

Should Romney not win on that first ballot, I'd recommend all in America to hit the streets for Palin.

Go Sarah!

91 posted on 07/30/2012 5:27:31 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner
there are no qualificational requirements for President

You will find those requierements in Article I, Section I of the US constitution,

92 posted on 07/30/2012 5:31:06 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: GodAndCountryFirst
Oops!!!

Make that Section II, Article I.

93 posted on 07/30/2012 5:34:01 PM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

As you said Article II contains “eligibility requirements” of age, residency, NBC birth/citizenship.

You won’t find any list of qualifications (accomplishments) in Article II.....job experience, schooling, degrees, wealth, ect.

As I said, other than gaining the largest vote totals over your opponet(s), there are no other qualifications for the office of the President.

The qualification of an individual to hold that office is strictly in the eye of the individual voter.

Barack Obama, in spite of his not meeting Article II eligibility requirements, and possessing no other qualifications other than the largest vote total, has sat in the oval office for nearly 4 years now.

To question Sarah Palin’s “qualifications” to be president in light of BO total lack of outside accomplishment is ludicrus.

All Sarah needs is to be on the ballot and receive the necessary votes....just like Barack. Her outside accomplishments so far outshine Barack’s, and some other presidents for that matter, in every other area that a direct comparison is a one sided affair.


94 posted on 07/30/2012 7:07:52 PM PDT by Forty-Niner (The barely bare, berry bear formerly known as..........Ursus Arctos Horribilis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: W. W. SMITH

“Death threats against her, her children, her extended family. There are more than enough Bill Ayers types on the left to carry out such threats.”
_____________________________________________________

Sadly, you’re correct. I still wish she had run though.

The Left truly fear her.


95 posted on 07/30/2012 7:35:27 PM PDT by Artcore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

“NEWBIE????

ROTFLMAO”

That was the point. :-)


96 posted on 07/31/2012 3:05:32 PM PDT by Valin (I'm not completely worthless. I can be used as a bad example.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: FourtySeven

All it requires is for Ann Romney to SAY she has fallen ill — and then miraculously rally back to health after the convention. We can pray for that.


97 posted on 07/31/2012 6:50:19 PM PDT by GodAndCountryFirst
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-97 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson