Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama calls for cars to get almost 55 mpg (Price of autos to increase by at least $3,000)
LA Times ^ | 8/28/2012 | Neela Banerjee

Posted on 08/29/2012 3:50:18 AM PDT by tobyhill

The Obama administration announced fuel economy standards Tuesday that would require car makers to almost double the average gas mileage for passenger vehicles to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.

The final rules mark the latest step in a lengthy campaign by the administration to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and oil consumption and are the highest fuel efficiency standards in U.S. history.

With an eye to the looming presidential election, the White House touted the standards as a boost for middle-class consumers. "These fuel standards represent the single most important step we've ever taken to reduce our dependence on foreign oil," President Obama said.

But the Romney campaign was quick to condemn the rules as impractical and harmful. "Gov. Romney opposes the extreme standards that President Obama has imposed, which will limit the choices available to American families," campaign spokeswoman Andrea Saul said.

While automobile manufacturers welcomed the new rules, auto dealers decried them. The dealers association contends that the 2025 rules would drive up the average vehicle sticker price by $3,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

1 posted on 08/29/2012 3:50:23 AM PDT by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Which, not incidentally, will pretty much kill off anything that isn’t a Volt, Prius, Leaf or similar - as these standards also apply to trucks and SUVs.


2 posted on 08/29/2012 3:52:32 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The Communist/Marxist/Kenyan Tyrant will do to cars,
what he has done to gasoline and NASA.

They are to be ONLY for the Congress and Islam.


3 posted on 08/29/2012 3:57:24 AM PDT by Diogenesis (Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Hey, why stop at 55? Why not go for 200mpg? If we’re gonna go for a pipe dream, let’s make it BIG!!


4 posted on 08/29/2012 3:58:21 AM PDT by SpartacusII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

No, it will kill the car. Period. This is a scheme to get us out of the rural areas and cram us into new projects where we can be “supervised” better...all in his commie-fascist dreams...


5 posted on 08/29/2012 3:58:21 AM PDT by Shady (The Tea Party is the Party of the American People, Working and creating wealth in SPITE of OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

just let all the air out of all the tires and you will get infinite miles per gallon!


6 posted on 08/29/2012 3:58:39 AM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Those kind of cars were being built in 1952.

Does anybody remember the King Midget? Or maybe the original Fiat 500? If made small enough, or light enough, with a really tiny power plant (say about twelve horsepower or so), four-wheeled vehicles CAN get mileage up in that range.

Not so good for the everyday chores of life, though. And really dreadful when it comes to merging with traffic on the Outer Loop around Washington, DC.


7 posted on 08/29/2012 3:58:53 AM PDT by alloysteel (Are you better off than you were four years ago? Well, are you?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Did no one tell him the Volt is out of production?


8 posted on 08/29/2012 4:03:43 AM PDT by jersey117
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shady

No, this won’t kill the car.

The hike *after* this one will kill the car.


9 posted on 08/29/2012 4:05:20 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jersey117

It’s back in production.


10 posted on 08/29/2012 4:05:57 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

And even worse if you cut someone off who is driving anything larger and they can’t stop.


11 posted on 08/29/2012 4:06:29 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
The administration says that at most, it could be as high as $1,800 and would likely be offset by $8,000 in gas savings over the lifetime of the vehicle.

My Saturn is 16 years old and I haven't even spent $8,000 on gas for it. This is simply another central planning failure being implemented by Obama. Another one-size-fits-all program. More car owners will be retired and putting fewer miles on their cars (like me) and this program will simply cost them more money to drive a new car so we won't buy them.

12 posted on 08/29/2012 4:08:13 AM PDT by MulberryDraw (That which cannot be paid, won't be paid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

The first car I ever ownedgot 58 miles per gallon.
It was a 24HP Volkswagon Beetle and all that I could afford. Every vehicle that I’ve owned since has gotten progressively less miles per gallon.
My current vehicle gets about 12MPG.


13 posted on 08/29/2012 4:10:11 AM PDT by BuffaloJack (The First Amendment is a large caliber weapon. USE IT !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MulberryDraw

They mean $8,000 gas savings of gas at $10 a gallon, which is another one of their goals.


14 posted on 08/29/2012 4:13:04 AM PDT by Old_Grouch (65 and AARP-free. Monthly FR contributor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill
With an eye to the looming presidential election, the White House touted the standards as a boost for middle-class consumers. "These fuel standards represent the single most important step we've ever taken to reduce our dependence on foreign oil," President Obama said.

This is Obama in a nutshell.

Middle-Class Consumers know what is good for them. Given a choice between an expensive car that gets fair milage and an expensive car that gets exceptional milage, most folks will do the math and buy the car that is cheapest to run. You can run a Chevy Malibu for the rest of your life and not save enough to recover the extra money you would have to pay for a Chevy Volt. Add in the time cost of money, the cost for increased maintenance and premature obsolescence, and you never get close to getting your money back.

Middle-Class Consumers understand this and are capable of making the best choice.

As far as reducing our dependence on foreign oil, how about letting us drill our own resources? How about Keystone XL? (Canada is not really what you would call foreign...)

15 posted on 08/29/2012 4:14:31 AM PDT by Haiku Guy ("The problem with Internet Quotes is that you never know if they are real" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

“The final rules mark the latest step in a lengthy campaign by the administration to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and oil consumption and are the highest fuel efficiency standards in U.S. history.”

***

BS. These rules are meant to kill off the middle class.


16 posted on 08/29/2012 4:15:11 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpartacusII
Hey, why stop at 55? Why not go for 200mpg? If we’re gonna go for a pipe dream, let’s make it BIG!!

Been there... Done that...

Remember, the Chevy Volt gets 230 MPG!!1!

17 posted on 08/29/2012 4:17:43 AM PDT by Haiku Guy ("The problem with Internet Quotes is that you never know if they are real" -- Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Shady

I agree. But yea Romney is not conservative enough so its fine to not vote.
LOL
All these whiners on here won’t even see a country they recognize if zerO get’s another four years with his scheme of letting massive amounts of thugs from below the border in our country. Think the demographics now make it hard for a conservative to win? HA! Just wait.
Then again these whiners sit on their ass and do nothing to fix things, I bet they’d love for Ozero to get another term in order to give them something to complain about.


18 posted on 08/29/2012 4:18:08 AM PDT by snarkytart (http://www.freerepubli224%2C1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel

For some reason small size doesn’t always translate to fuel efficiency, though. Take a look at a Smart Car on the road, for example, and notice how ridiculously small it is. Then realize that it isn’t even as fuel-efficient as a typical compact car like a Ford Focus or Honda Civic.


19 posted on 08/29/2012 4:23:38 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tobyhill

Renault 4! Problem solved.


20 posted on 08/29/2012 4:23:49 AM PDT by dinodino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson