Skip to comments.
Rasmussen: Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (Romney 48 Obama 44)
Rasmussen Reports ^
| 09/02/2012
| Scott Rasmussen
Posted on 09/02/2012 7:12:26 AM PDT by nhwingut
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: nhwingut
2012 will hinge on turnout. We know the Dems will cheat. The only question is whether the Republicans can get enough people to care about going to the polls to overcome that.
21
posted on
09/02/2012 7:52:04 AM PDT
by
PapaBear3625
("They say I don't pray for my enemies. I do.. I pray they go to Hell!" ---Marshall Law)
To: paul in cape
My friends (three families) voted for Obama in 2008. They said that they won’t make that mistake again and will voted for Romney/Ryan this time.
22
posted on
09/02/2012 7:58:01 AM PDT
by
Justaham
To: JLAGRAYFOX
The question is whether Hugh will turn out or not.
23
posted on
09/02/2012 7:58:42 AM PDT
by
palmer
(Jim, please bill me 50 cents for this completely useless post)
To: paul in cape
Had 3 neighbors stop to say hi, and asked about it. I know 12 people who voted for Obama and are not doing so again. Five of those 12 have never voted for a Republican for President (to my knowledge).
24
posted on
09/02/2012 7:59:55 AM PDT
by
Michael.SF.
(Romney was right about the Olympics, but neither the Brits or the Dems will admit it.)
To: Hojczyk
Much larger racial/ethnic protected class as well.
To: paudio
“Plus, some people want to hear what the parties have to offer.”
I guess that's my point. There is such a deep philosophical divide between the European socialism-loving current democrat party, and even RINOs, that I can't imaging having to even think about it. That, to me, is like waiting for the convention to decide whether you're going to back Karl Marx or Ronald Reagan.
To: AU72
27
posted on
09/02/2012 8:19:41 AM PDT
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: AU72
28
posted on
09/02/2012 8:19:50 AM PDT
by
ScaniaBoy
(Part of the Right Wing Research & Attack Machine)
To: SamAdams76
I think in 08, despite his so-called “maverick” status, McCain was the “incumbent.” Obama was the unknown. I agree with several of you that barring some truly unbelievable development, he can’t get above 47% this time around.
29
posted on
09/02/2012 8:21:49 AM PDT
by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually (Hendrix))
To: nhwingut
Mitt needs to give Clint Eastwood a Cabinet position....
30
posted on
09/02/2012 8:22:23 AM PDT
by
Victor
(If an expert says it can't be done, get another expert." -David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister)
To: nhwingut
Obama is consistently in the 44-47 range which is where his approval ratings are. Additionally all projection models based on economic data put his percentage in the same range.
31
posted on
09/02/2012 8:26:59 AM PDT
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: LS
Yep. The GOP was the incumbent party making McCain effectively the incumbent candidate.
32
posted on
09/02/2012 8:29:07 AM PDT
by
Wyatt's Torch
(I can explain it to you. I can't understand it for you.)
To: MNJohnnie
“I dont see how 0 gets any higher in the polls there were he is now.”
Wait until zer0 pulls the HildeBeast out of the hat to replace Biden.
33
posted on
09/02/2012 8:30:18 AM PDT
by
panaxanax
(Voting 'Third Party' will ensure a Communist-Marxist-Socialist dominated Supreme Court!)
To: nhwingut
And this lead will continue to widen. 0’s Intrade numbers are still at 57% for re-election though, I would love to see that number go down.
34
posted on
09/02/2012 8:35:51 AM PDT
by
erod
(This Chicagoan will crawl over broken glass to vote the fake Chicagoan Obama out!)
To: dalebert
Obama will be up by 10 even if they have to oversample Dems by 20.
35
posted on
09/02/2012 8:41:02 AM PDT
by
newzjunkey
(Election night is 64 days away.)
To: JLAGRAYFOX
It will be a very interesting week. The 'rats have built a campaign on hate and lies; and with flagging enthusiasm among the masses, will have to pander to the various freakazoids who are their base. Don't know how well that will go down with job-starved America, but we'll see.
To: nhwingut
So in reality it is Romney 58-42. The Polls are all going to be way off this election and that is the way he is going to blame and fight the results.
37
posted on
09/02/2012 8:46:37 AM PDT
by
crazydad
(-` sd)
To: Michael.SF.
Five of those 12 have never voted for a Republican for President (to my knowledge). They don't even have to do that. Just stay home on November 6th.
Turnout. Supress theirs, increase ours. Do that; we win.
To: nhwingut
We have to make it clear to black Americans that they can do better than the chump change the Democrats throw to them for their votes.
39
posted on
09/02/2012 8:50:22 AM PDT
by
blueunicorn6
("A crack shot and a good dancer")
To: pieceofthepuzzle
Despite what some Freepers believe, independents (not just in terms of party registration) do exist. Unlike Freepers or DUers, they don’t care much about ideology, or more precisely, about conservative or liberal ideology. Their ideology is what they perceive as “work for them” today. It may change over time,as needed. So, their voting decision depends on the issue of the day, and who they think can deliver better.
40
posted on
09/02/2012 8:51:41 AM PDT
by
paudio
(Post-racial society: When we can legitimately hire and fire a Black man without feeling guilty.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson