Posted on 09/04/2012 4:37:54 AM PDT by Kaslin
Obama has failed at everything he promised to accomplish...
Have you seen this? Obama and his promises:
http://www.conservativenationnews.com/2012/09/powerful-new-romney-campaign-ad-hits.html
. I hope enough Americans eyes have been opened to the hyper-partisan, lying media.
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Romney could ‘debate’ an empty chair but with some of the hand picked ‘moderators’ and MSM, he would probably still be declared the loser.
***Lyndon Johnson, his 44-state landslide in 1964 and Great Society notwithstanding,***
Remember 1964? Johnson won by proclaiming “I will not send American boys to fight in a war Asian boys should be fighting!”
Whereas Goldwater stated he would send troops if necessary.
Back in 1970, PLAYBOY magazine had an interview with JOHN WAYNE.
In the interview Wayne mentioned that after the politicians had made their statements about sending troops to VN, Goldwater talked with Johnson and said to him...”You know we will have to send troops to Vietnam!”
Johnson replied...”I know, but I am trying to win an election.”
Since that day,I have NEVER believed anything that comes out of the mouth of a Democrat.
I was told that if I voted for Goldwater, that we would have riots in the streets and get into a long unwinnable war, well I voted for Goldwater, and darned if they weren’t right.
FACT: ObamaCrimes.com http://obamacrimes.com
Poorly FORGED: Federal Document Dump Policy Changes After Obama Probe Begins.
Let’s go back to the post I responded to in the first place.
This is the comment at post #4 I responded to: “Another small difference is that Mitt Romney is no Ronald Reagan!”
I responded with this post: “Exactly! Hes far from a Ronald Reagan, and thats worth a few worry wrinkles IMO.”
Later I responded to Post #6 which was nonsense about pissin’, and moanin’ not going to get us through the election, as though that was the discussion with this post: “You have a problem with a statement of fact?”
So, now that you know what the original discussion was all about perhaps you could clue me in as to what your comment means relative to that.
This is what I am pretty sure of what will happen, it won’t be a debate.
What I also don’t like is that I don’t see that killer instinct in Romney’s campaign, he’s playing nice like McCain.
I hope I am wrong, but I think that if this keeps up, the Marxist kenyan wins again.
Coolidge died on Jan. 5, 1933, so if he had been re-elected in 1928 he would have died in office. (He died of a coronary thrombosis--perhaps the stress of office would have killed him sooner if he had still been President.)
If Coolidge had run again in 1928 with the same running mate, at his death Charles Curtis would have become President. Curtis was part Indian.
Scratch that last sentence. Charles Curtis was Hoover’s Vice President. The man who would have become President if Coolidge had died in office was Charles Dawes.
Scratch that last sentence. Charles Curtis was Hoover’s Vice President. The man who would have become President if Coolidge had died in office was Charles Dawes.
The term "credibility gap" was first heard then, in relation to the Johnson administration.
It was as close as the already liberal media dared come to calling a Democrat politician "liar". But that's what it meant all the same.
Is that how the RNC taught you to tell conservatives "STFU"?
Very mannerly. Also very otiose: Mitt Romney is a wet noodle of a candidate. Supporting him is like standing up wet spaghetti. He's way too cool for you, for openers. He's all about the infamous 350,000 women in 10 battleground States. No time for you. No time for me. No time for anyone but the 350,000 women.
Bump. Yeah, it'll be a tag-team match: Triple H and The Undertaker versus the coxswain of the Harvard Fours.
Read it is self explanatory, Choice, Romney over Obama is all we need to make sure of, unless you would rather vote for a corrupt President like Obama.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftvbxSEFJM8
NOT what my post was addressing. Stick to the point. Don’t waste my time.
Romney isn’t my first choice, but I’m not stupid, and not voting for Obama, or taking other actions in Obama’s favor. I don’t understand what makes you, and other FReepers think anybody that doesn’t kiss Romney’s butt, and praise his coiffure isn’t going to vote for the SOB.
We who don’t kiss Romney’s butt, because we don’t like the mans Liberal track record don’t want Obama anymore than you do, so get off our butts, and go play with your toys.
BUMP
The suggestion that either candidate can unite and lead the country if they should win is naive. The acrimony is too deep. If Romney is elected then the Democrats will do exactly what the GOP has done; try and make sure Romney is a one term president. They will go to any lengths to block, filibuster, delay, and defeat anything Romney proposes. And should Obama get re-elected, then I don’t expect the GOP to do any different.
There in lies the difference. Congress will not reduce federal spending. Federal expenditures went down during two of Coolidge's budgets. That won't happen now.
I failed to notice the author of this piece, shock of shocks it’s Pat Buchanan. Guy is sure no fiscal conservative (or intelligent political commentator).
I wish Former Governor Frank Lowden of Ill. had excepted Coolidge’s VP offer in 1924 (he was nominated and declined, possibly the only time that has happened). Hoover was popular (he won the nomination easily over Lowden and others) but he might have stood a chance against him in 1928 as the sitting VP.
I don’t know what kind of Prez he would have been (he sounds good) but it could not possibly have turned out any worse.
It would have even been preferable to have Al Smith as President. At the least that would have meant no FDR in 1932. Possibly no anti-GOP backlash at all.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.