Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Daily Presidential Tracking Poll (Rasmussen) - O:47%, R:49%, 'other':2%
Rasmussen ^ | Oct. 6, 2012 | Rasmussen

Posted on 10/06/2012 6:44:28 AM PDT by AFPhys

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Saturday shows Mitt Romney attracting support from 49% of voters nationwide, while President Obama earns the vote from 47%. Two percent (2%) prefer some other candidate, and two percent (2%) are undecided.

These results are based upon nightly interviews and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. As a result, only about two-thirds of the interviews for today’s update were conducted after the presidential debate. Sunday morning’s update will be the first national polling based entirely upon post-debate interviews.

Still, the numbers reflect quite a debate bounce for Romney. Heading into Wednesday’s showdown, it was the president who enjoyed a two-point advantage. Today is the first time Romney has been ahead by even a single point since mid-September. See daily tracking history. As with all bounces, it remains to be seen whether it is a temporary blip or signals a lasting change in the race.

Both men have solidified their partisan base. Romney is supported by 89% of Republicans and Obama by 88% of Democrats. Among those not affiliated with either major party, Romney leads by 16.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; polls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last
A bit of a bounce...
1 posted on 10/06/2012 6:44:32 AM PDT by AFPhys
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

And one of those three days was being the debate :)

WOOT!


2 posted on 10/06/2012 6:46:40 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

being = before

I need some coffee


3 posted on 10/06/2012 6:47:09 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama lied .. the economy died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Just a bit? *wink*

Rasmussen doesn’t do big swings very well because they weight their party affiliations. A one-day 4-point swing when the debate has not even been baked in yet is gigantic.


4 posted on 10/06/2012 6:49:42 AM PDT by Cruising For Freedom (Don't be the proof that MSM PsyOps works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Yes... and I think that Ras had 0bama (aka Zero, -bama, Minusbama, etc...) up by 50-47 the day before the debate, if I recall correctly. This is a huge difference.


5 posted on 10/06/2012 6:50:17 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
President Obama earns the vote from 47%

Looks like Romney was wrong about being wrong about the 47%.

6 posted on 10/06/2012 6:50:26 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cruising For Freedom

That is a very good point. I believe that Ras weights according to a 3-week moving average of party affiliation. That means that there will be automatic D oversampling when people are swinging toward saying “I am an R”.

According to another thread, 20 minutes into the debate, GOP online voter registrations started zooming upward, and that has not yet abated, according to last I heard.


7 posted on 10/06/2012 6:53:30 AM PDT by AFPhys ((Praying for our troops, our citizens, that the Bible and Freedom become basis of the US law again))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

Coffee?! I need some champagne!!!


8 posted on 10/06/2012 6:54:14 AM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

the independents number is the best news, if Romney goes into election day with a 16% lead over Obama in indies, this race is over.


9 posted on 10/06/2012 6:54:39 AM PDT by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Just wait until after the Biden Beatdown on Thursday these numbers will look even better.


10 posted on 10/06/2012 6:54:43 AM PDT by erod (This Chicagoan will crawl over broken glass to vote the fake Chicagoan Obama out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

With Democrat oversampling too.


11 posted on 10/06/2012 6:56:34 AM PDT by DarthVader (Politicians govern out of self interest, Statesmen govern for a Vision greater than themselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
“Outlier!!”

—MSM so far up Obama’s butt a right turn would break their necks.

12 posted on 10/06/2012 6:56:34 AM PDT by Happy Rain ("Water is wet and Obama is a liar.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cruising For Freedom

But, what I always wonder is, with each side at rough parity, and just a slightly different sample for D and R, how can Romney be up ONLY +2 if he gets +16 among undecideds? Is their number that small?


13 posted on 10/06/2012 6:56:59 AM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Why list Zero first? Odd way to show who’s leading.


14 posted on 10/06/2012 6:57:13 AM PDT by nhwingut (Sarah Palin 12... No One Else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Very cool, I hadn’t heard of that. If you can find that thread again, can you ping me to it?

According to another thread, Rasmussen was on O’Reilly on Thursday night expecting Romney to lead by at least 2 by Monday. He said that on Thursday night. Curious thing to say if Monday back then was more than 3 days away and you have a 3-day tracking poll.

I think he was seeing a big surge in R responses and predicting when the R weighting would start showing up, rather than going off by that day’s polling data.


15 posted on 10/06/2012 6:57:36 AM PDT by Cruising For Freedom (Don't be the proof that MSM PsyOps works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

+16 I for Romney is impressive!


16 posted on 10/06/2012 6:57:40 AM PDT by JPG (Make it happen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

‘Bout damned time scotty!

LLS


17 posted on 10/06/2012 6:58:10 AM PDT by LibLieSlayer ("If it looks like you are not gonna make it you gotta get mean, I mean plumb mad-dog mean" J. Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

I meant Independents, not undecided.


18 posted on 10/06/2012 6:59:36 AM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys

Not many undecideds remain.


19 posted on 10/06/2012 6:59:45 AM PDT by MNDude (OWS Movement RIP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrChips

Rasmussen has been using an increasing D weighting and does not follow his own monthly party affiliation numbers. D+4.5 last time I reverse-engineered the internals which was around last week.

Also, Romney has consistently had moderate leads with independents, so it’s not like it’s a 16-point swing among independents.


20 posted on 10/06/2012 7:02:53 AM PDT by Cruising For Freedom (Don't be the proof that MSM PsyOps works.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-170 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson