Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

ping


3 posted on 10/25/2012 8:39:53 AM PDT by Nervous Tick ("You can ignore reality, but you can't ignore the consequences of ignoring reality.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

It’s less than two weeks to get the real numbers.. You should, for your own mental health, and practice a sound business judgement, don’t trust anything or anybody to not have an agenda in these polls.. My 2 cents/sense.. :)


7 posted on 10/25/2012 8:51:04 AM PDT by carlo3b (Less Government, more Fiber..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick
I think the underlying correlation is really is that canvassing fewer voters = having less money = having poorer quality statisticians and actuaries.

There is another factor not considered, which is past history. In past elections, CBS/News, WSJ/NBC, and FoxNews/Opinion Dynamics always skew +2 to +4 Dem. Skewing in favor of those more likely to respond shows that these firms have poorer models to correct for the high refusal rates which are now standard.

15 posted on 10/25/2012 12:31:32 PM PDT by FredZarguna ("The future does not belong to those who do not eat bacon.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson