Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CIA's language on Benghazi was barely edited, White House says
politico44 ^ | 11/17/12 | JENNIFER EPSTEIN

Posted on 11/17/2012 2:59:18 PM PST by ColdOne

The White House made only small, factual edits to the CIA's initial intelligence assessment on the September attack on Americans in Benghazi, deputy national security adviser Ben Rhodes said Saturday.

"We were provided with points by the intelligence community that represented their assessment," Rhodes said aboard Air Force One en route to Asia. "The only edit made by the White House was the factual edit about how to refer to the facility.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: petraeustestimony
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Yeah right.....factual edits. This White House wouldn't tell the facts on anything.

4 died that night. 40 others left to die.Obama did nothing to help them and that is a FACT!

1 posted on 11/17/2012 2:59:22 PM PST by ColdOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

murderers attempt a rewrite, barely..........substituted terroist attack for demonstration


2 posted on 11/17/2012 3:01:59 PM PST by ronnie raygun (bb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

A ha ha ...


3 posted on 11/17/2012 3:03:10 PM PST by BunnySlippers (I LOVE BULL MARKETS . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ronnie raygun

One man’s terrorist is another man’s demonstrator/freedom fighter.


4 posted on 11/17/2012 3:04:59 PM PST by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Note the word game here - “altered” - when in fact the critical part was what they omitted. And omission is the most powerful form of lie.


5 posted on 11/17/2012 3:05:35 PM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
And, were those "factual" edits the ones the White House trotted out via Susan Rice et al (including Obozo himself) where they kept claiming the attacks were just a riot over a video that got out of control???

I'm fed up with the White House whores treating me as if I have zero intelligence. These people, beginning with the head of the snake (Obozo) need to be removed from office.

6 posted on 11/17/2012 3:06:20 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud dad of an Army Soldier who has survived 24 months of Combat deployment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Lies Lies Lies Lies Lies. Our country is going down fast.


7 posted on 11/17/2012 3:08:04 PM PST by Saundra Duffy ( For victory & freedom!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

The WH could easily have sent the report back to be changed the way they wanted and still be making this same statement.


8 posted on 11/17/2012 3:10:00 PM PST by Berlin_Freeper (There goes the dominoes...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Mr President, your protestations are fraudulent. All of the documentation and facts produced so far back up Petraeus.

You can lie all you want, until you produce answers, YOU LIED!


9 posted on 11/17/2012 3:11:53 PM PST by Bryan24 (When in doubt, move to the right..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Everything here is a lawyerly word-game.

As Bill Clinton said, it depends on what the meaning of “is” is.


10 posted on 11/17/2012 3:12:12 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
Lies2012
11 posted on 11/17/2012 3:13:21 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Hurricane Sandy..., a week later and 48 million Americans still didn't have power.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
CIA's language on Benghazi was barely edited, White House says

SO the White House DID edit the CIA's language.

Drip......... drip...... drip....... drip.....

12 posted on 11/17/2012 3:14:03 PM PST by theDentist (FUBO; qwerty ergo typo : i type, therefore i misspelll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Now we have the ‘spontaneously changing intel memo’ to go along with the ‘spontaneous protest.’ I guess I will just hope that 0coward will spontaneously combust.


13 posted on 11/17/2012 3:14:13 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

We have become a 3rd world country so quickly


14 posted on 11/17/2012 3:14:29 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

factual edit = LIE


15 posted on 11/17/2012 3:15:12 PM PST by Doogle ((USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
"Barely."

Now there's a precision word. Not.

16 posted on 11/17/2012 3:16:14 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum (Government is the religion of the psychopath.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

How big must deceit be before it is criminal if it was used to hide the incompetence of a corrupt communists organization.


17 posted on 11/17/2012 3:16:29 PM PST by Logical me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Rep. Peter King (R-N.Y.) said Petraeus had indicated that the initial report pointed to Al Qaeda involvement, but that the talking points eventually cleared for use by administration officials had scrubbed that reference.

But Rhodes said that language never made it into the assessment that the White House and State Department received, and that any edit happened before it reached them.

Oh, I get it. The WH put the intel report on its website and let the Twitter community edit it. Tomorrow's talking point.

18 posted on 11/17/2012 3:20:31 PM PST by TigersEye (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

did the fool in the w h ever think that by admitting “they” barely edited the report that they confirmed they lied? think V. jarrett had anything to do with this?


19 posted on 11/17/2012 3:23:33 PM PST by 1st Division guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne
The difference between "It was an act of terrorism" and "It was not an act of terrorism" is just three lower case letters.

Hardly worth discussing, the MSM will say.

20 posted on 11/17/2012 3:24:07 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson