Skip to comments.
WE KNOW HOW TO STOP SCHOOL SHOOTINGS (ANN COULTER)
Ann Coulter Website ^
| December 19, 2012
| Ann Coulter
Posted on 12/19/2012 4:41:19 PM PST by fkabuckeyesrule
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: Cuttnhorse
I’d suggest placing retired cops and military men in the schools with AR-15’s or something similar. Pay them a small stipend.
41
posted on
12/19/2012 6:38:09 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Cigarettes are like squirrels: Perfectly harmless until you put one in your mouth and set it on fire)
To: Resettozero
I, on the other hand, do not care to see anything written or said by her anymore especially on FR. Shes a false prophet.Thanks for dropping in to make that announcement.
42
posted on
12/19/2012 6:43:13 PM PST
by
Homer_J_Simpson
("Every nation has the government that it deserves." - Joseph de Maistre (1753-1821))
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Apparently, AC has kept her sanity about guns. This is a good article.
43
posted on
12/19/2012 7:02:23 PM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
To: Resettozero
Well, if liberals have the inability to separate the message from the person, why not freepers like you?
Until conservatives start looking at politics in a tactical manner, we’ll have more 2012’s. Enjoy the next four years!
44
posted on
12/19/2012 7:13:33 PM PST
by
Loud Mime
(Conservatives refused to unite; now we pay the price!)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
What happened to that deliciously delightful Ann Coulter posting rule?
45
posted on
12/19/2012 7:42:52 PM PST
by
lightman
(If the Patriarchate of the East held a state like the Vatican I would apply for political asylum.)
To: Resettozero
No longer am I amused by the posting of supposedly cute, patriotic, and sexy pictures of her on FR as I was some years ago. I don't want to see her aiming the rifle on the porch steps. No longer do I seek or want her advice on any subject and will not be purchasing or reading any books or articles she may wish to sell. Then why did you click on this thread and waste your time and others' by posting on it -- more than once?
46
posted on
12/19/2012 8:10:32 PM PST
by
Albion Wilde
(The only way to stop a man with a gun is with a gun. --Daniel Greenfield)
To: Resettozero
“I, on the other hand, do not care to see anything written or said by her anymore especially on FR. “
-
I’m confused. If you feel that way why on earth did you click onto this thread? Her name is in the header for Pete’s sake.
.
47
posted on
12/19/2012 8:17:30 PM PST
by
Mears
To: RoosterRedux
“To protect children, one must define the danger and develop and implement a trained (practiced and effective) defense.”
Protecting children at school should be the easy part. Give them the same protection our lawmakers have, armed guards at their workplace/school.Children are at risk coming and going from school also. Do away with school buses(a major attack waiting to happen) Protecting our children is a major problem as they are prime targets. A ban on black guns won’t do a damned thing to prevent another attack on our children
48
posted on
12/19/2012 9:15:40 PM PST
by
Figment
To: fkabuckeyesrule
[Coulter article]
The magazine reaches its conclusion by simply excluding all cases where an armed civilian stopped the shooter: They looked only at public shootings where four or more people were killed, i.e., the ones where the shooter wasn't stopped. This makes their proposition a tautology -- an offense against logic and on-the-square debate.
Also known as sharping or pencil-whipping the other guy.
Basically, it's dishonest, and that's all we need to know. But we knew that as soon as Ann told us a liberal had said it with a straight face.
To: Mr. Silverback
....military men in the schools with AR-15’s or something similar .... Nah. Shotguns. Avoid overpenetration, accidentally killing Mrs. McGillicuddy in her clapboard house 1-3/4's miles away.
Something like that happened in the 1992 L.A. riots. The Korean shopkeepers cranking rounds at the rioting black mob nailed a Hispana coming home from the grocery on foot. She was something near two miles from the riot zone [TIME reported] when she stopped a big-bore pistol bullet with her forehead. She dropped dead on the spot.
Then there was the Philadelphia woman who had a late-night visitor in the form of a .223-cal. round come through her apartment wall just above her head, from a LE/SWAT/SpecOps live-fire exercise in a vacant high-rise a mile or so away. A round got away and came to see her. Interrupted her bedtime reading.
To: fkabuckeyesrule
51
posted on
12/20/2012 12:30:22 AM PST
by
Rummyfan
(Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
To: Resettozero
Ditto's. No more book buys from myself or my friends.
F-me once, shame on me. Twice will not happen.
52
posted on
12/20/2012 12:38:04 AM PST
by
MaxMax
To: DoughtyOne
If someone has a firm belief, I dont care what evidence you present, theyll simply dismiss it and go on believing what they please. Yes myself and a friend (who gave me the article) presented Arron Zellman's Interview from 1995-ish time frame in a Gun Magazine to Liberal friends, mine was a co-worker, his, his girlfriend. My co-worker turned white as a ghost when presented the evidence and mumbled away, ya but I don't care I still want the ban, his girlfriend was pissed and sort of had an answer similar to my friend..
You see you challenge their epistemology and it is to scary, that you are challenging how they know what they know. It makes all the liberal lies of what they know fall like a house of cards, and it is too painful, because you are going to their core.
They can't have it, they'd rather go on believing in the tooth fairy...
53
posted on
12/20/2012 2:28:19 AM PST
by
taildragger
(( Tighten the 5 point harness and brace for Impact Freepers, ya know it's coming..... ))
To: Albion Wilde
Then why did you click on this thread and waste your time and others' by posting on it -- more than once?
Because it was a golden opportunity to signal to former-Coulter fans such as I was, and to other FReepers, my thoughts on the subject and I wanted to respond to some replies posted to me on this thread.
And you, presumptious poster, are not the judge of how I spend my time--not yet anyway--and I did not require you to respond to me or waste your time in any manner.
To: Mears
Im confused. If you feel that way why on earth did you click onto this thread? Her name is in the header for Petes sake.
Because it was an opportunity to signal to former-Coulter fans such as I was, and to other FReepers, how my thoughts had changed on the subject and I wanted to respond to some replies posted to me on this thread.
Do not believe that beginning a forum thread on FR or posting a civil comment constitutes ownership of the thread or is against the site rules, written or implied. Surely you can understand that point of view, as a conservative FReeper.
To: Loud Mime
Well, if liberals have the inability to separate the message from the person, why not freepers like you?
Sorry, don't understand your argument with me.
Until conservatives start looking at politics in a tactical manner, well have more 2012s.
Thanks for responding with your advice.
Enjoy the next four years!
Thank you; you too.
To: taildragger
I have a relative whose favorite tactic is to dismiss anything that didn’t emanate from the union front office. Sad.
57
posted on
12/20/2012 7:21:29 AM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(How about a waiting period for putting crazys out on the streets, say NEVER!)
To: All
THIS IS NOW ABOUT COLLECTING EMAIL LISTS FOR 2014.
All the petitions from democrats is to isolate and divide the ignorant into the lefts fold. (see all they want is peaceful coexistance)
58
posted on
12/20/2012 7:36:32 AM PST
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: fkabuckeyesrule
Teachers and administrators act in loco parentis. Laws and regulations which actively and positively prohibit these people from protecting those in their care ARE against the general welfare of the public in general and the responsibilities of the positions they hold.
59
posted on
12/20/2012 7:41:08 AM PST
by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto!)
To: Cuttnhorse
The problem with the suggestion that principals and teachers start carrying in school is that teachers are a largely a bunch of nutso lefties who hate guns and wouldnt pull the trigger... We have volunteer firemen all over this country because not all people would run into a burning building to put it out - nor are they equipped or trained to do so.
How about volunteer parents, grandparents, ex-police, ex-military, or CCW holders who are vetted, trained, and willing to provide immediate deterrence and protection while the school is in session?
They don't have to teach or even interact with students. Their only purpose is to deter and prevent murder and mayhem until the police arrive 10-20 minutes later. Their responsibility is be on site and immediately available with communications and weapons, perhaps under the direct supervision of an off duty or retired policeman. Volunteers can work in shifts and are not "full time". Then you have on site defense in depth.
By the way, this is a similar model to that which prevented the massacre in the Colorado Springs church shooting a few years ago.
60
posted on
12/20/2012 7:50:59 AM PST
by
Gritty
(If any of the Western world is to survive, it has to find a way to turn around, to go back-Mk Steyn)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson