Posted on 05/11/2013 9:05:45 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Edited on 05/11/2013 9:20:29 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]
Both parties are wrong about the scandal: It
(Excerpt) Read more at nationaljournal.com ...
fyi
Yeah, it’s not Watergate. Nobody died in Watergate.
I don’t exactly agree with that. It is as big an issue as the press wishes to make it.
No one died in Watergate. Benghazi is far worse. The USA has always said they do not leave personnel behind in time of danger. That is a lie now, because those who cried out for help were ignored by Obama and Hillary. The military was told not to come to the aid of these four Americans. It seems they were deemed expendable in that 3:00 AM phone call.
Exactly. And they won’t make it a big one. While this is in no way a comment on the merits, I guarantee you this goes nowhere.
Really,Ron,really!
Nonsense.
Obama's credibility is 100% manufactured by the MSM. If they ever turn on him, even a little bit, Senate Democrats will freak out and make that long overdue trip to the White House to demand his resignation.
Only, unlike Nixon in 1974, this jerk won't listen to them.
The reason it isn’t Watergate (or worse) is that they are Democrats. Can’t be said enough. If Nixon had been a Democrat, Watergate would never have been a scandal. End of story, or more like the story would never have begun.
Wow. The Democrats must be getting really worried. They are bringing out all the top MSM spinmeisters to try and make this go away.
This will be the left’s new spin; its a cover up of a badly handled situation. Then, they’ll try to make sure it goes away. The REAL scandal is the CIA operation running guns to Al Qaeda linked groups to overthrow Qaddafi and then Assad. What are you willing to bet that some of those weapons were used in the Benghazi attack? From here on in, its going to be everyone, State, the CIA, and the White House, all trying to throw each other under the bus. But will the MSM cover it?
What is the first thing you think when you see Obama or Hillary Clinton? Neither one is someone you would trust to run the country.
Nonsense. The cover-up is far more blatant than Watergate. And the crime is far worse.
There is also a man sitting in jail because of a youtube video that had nothing to do with anything.
If this were the Bush Administration, there would be round the clock blanket media coverage with screaming headlines, cliche ridden quotes and terms, easy to understand articles, and screaming headlines that couldn't be missed demanding Republican penance and resignations. That was Watergate.
We can’t let media lefties pretend this is only about the coverup.
What was the Obama administration actually doing in Benghazi? Whatever it was, it made Obama choose NOT to rescue his own Ambassador and other Americans by creating
battle that we could win. Instead Obama surrendered. WHY?
This cover up is a lot more serious than this article would allow. the thread article and its author are therefore highly suspect. Why do people keep trying to get the rush for truth in Benghazi cancelled? There is a LOT more to learn, including facts about presidential treason originating in the Obama ME apology tour.
This article reads like a prayer.
Quote:
“Coming as it did during a tense re-election race the administration’s determined reluctance to use the word “terrorists” seems informed, if not driven, by political considerations.”
I am getting old but I remember a question in the Senate hearings to CIA and DOD. The question was are you arming the Syrian rebels and they said no. Do either of you remember that? I will do some research when I get time.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.