Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/26/2013 9:18:53 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
To: blam
How Jerry Brown Saved California
2 posted on 05/26/2013 9:21:47 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Spend it! Spend it! You know you can, California!


3 posted on 05/26/2013 9:22:25 PM PDT by oblomov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
"An unexpected surplus is fueling an argument over how the state should respond to its turn of good fortune,"

There can be only one logical conclusion; Raise taxes.

4 posted on 05/26/2013 9:22:29 PM PDT by umgud (2A can't survive dem majorities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Build high speed rail? Free gay weddings for everybody? New “Rainbow Edition” Boy Scout handbooks?


5 posted on 05/26/2013 9:25:10 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (I'll raise $2million for Sarah Palin's next run. What'll you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
California cities looking for economic recovery


6 posted on 05/26/2013 9:26:29 PM PDT by Errant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
California now has so much projected revenue that Sacramento legislators don't what to do with it, The New York Times' Adam Nagourney reports.

Since when do tax increases actually yield the quantity of money they are projected to bring in?

That old saying about not counting the chickens before they hatch comes to mind. I'm betting the projected revenue never materializes.

7 posted on 05/26/2013 9:26:31 PM PDT by exDemMom (Now that I've finally accepted that I'm living a bad hair life, I'm more at peace with the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

B/S.


8 posted on 05/26/2013 9:27:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

“...Unexpected surplus...”, “...Good fortune...”

These clowns really do think that money just appears out of nowhere.

At best, they guess you print it up willy-nilly and it’s the fault of meanies that just want to hog it all. And the only way to get is to tax “the rich.”


10 posted on 05/26/2013 9:30:25 PM PDT by BradyLS (DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
is this their yearly deficit? from The Washington Times April 1 2013

A financial report issued by state auditors finds that the state of California is in the red by an unsustainable $127.2 billion.

The report says that the state’s negative status increased that year, largely because it spent $1.7 billion more than it received in revenues and wound up with an accumulated deficit of just under $23 billion in fiscal year 2011-2012, the Sacramento Bee stated.

14 posted on 05/26/2013 9:41:06 PM PDT by Chode (Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I have never liked the way the public language is framed.

There is NO surplus money, if debts are still owed. There might be extra money coming in, but that is not a surplus in this situation.

It is what comes of years of the press and politicians working to conflate "debt" and "deficit" in public mind.

Along the same line is balanced budget. Either a budget balances, i.e. assets = liabilities, or there else there is either an error or criminal activity. A budget is balanced whether it shows a deficit, surplus, or parity.

16 posted on 05/26/2013 9:45:31 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Love me, love my guns!©)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

http://usdebtclock.org/state-debt-clocks/state-of-california-debt-clock.html


17 posted on 05/26/2013 9:48:09 PM PDT by bluetick (If you're going to err, err on the side of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
The final budget surplus figure for 2014 will fall somewhere between $1.2 and $4.4 billion, depending on who's counting.

It was not long ago that California was facing a $24 billion deficit. That was a big problem. People might be opposed to the way Brown solved that giant problem but there is no denying he solved it.

As for any surplus, it should go to fund pensions to get that monster under control...right after pension reform is enacted to stop the double and triple dipping and government official retiring with $150,000 to $200,000 a year plus medical for life.

19 posted on 05/26/2013 9:49:45 PM PDT by gunsequalfreedom (Conservative is not a label of convenience. It is a guide to your actions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I don’t buy this for one second.


20 posted on 05/26/2013 9:50:20 PM PDT by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

NY has started ad campaigns, from Buffalo, no less.

If California had money they could start with paying back the hospitals for the medical bills their beloved Illegals racked up instead of expecting its citizens to pay along with their insurers.

But Cali has no more money than NY.


22 posted on 05/26/2013 9:52:50 PM PDT by stanne (en short on them especialcsly in today's world of politi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

If there really is a surplus, they should give taxpayers a REBATE, like they used to do in the before time.


23 posted on 05/26/2013 9:55:46 PM PDT by Selene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I suppose returning it to the taxpayers is out of the question?


25 posted on 05/26/2013 10:09:08 PM PDT by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

Projected based on rosy estimates of no more businesses leaving, no more sane citizens getting displaced by illegales, etc.?


26 posted on 05/26/2013 10:13:18 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (How long before all this "fairness" kills everybody, even the poor it was supposed to help???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

This is so not true.


27 posted on 05/26/2013 10:21:13 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam
I didn't read the article, but one suspects that the gains are very temporary, if not illusory.

1. IIRC, many folks sold issues at a profit, before cap gains tax increased. So there are some time-limited proceeds from this.

2. Higher tax rates on millionaires brought in more money, only because it takes a while for the 1 percenters to sell and move.

3. and I think I read that the chinese are buying property here in the once-golden state (please correct if I'm in error), so there is a stimulatory effect from that.

.

28 posted on 05/26/2013 10:25:59 PM PDT by Seaplaner (Never give in. Never give in. Never...except to convictions of honour and good sense. W. Churchill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: blam

I have an idea, pay some of your bills.
I don’t believe any of this BS anyways.

How’s that pension problem going CA?


29 posted on 05/26/2013 10:26:49 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson