Skip to comments.
Report: Pentagon to open SEALs, Army Rangers to women
The Hill ^
| June 17, 2013
| Carlo Munoz
Posted on 06/17/2013 3:18:27 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201 next last
To: central_va
like Holly...
141
posted on
06/17/2013 5:10:30 PM PDT
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: ansel12
Currently shown on the GoArmy.com website. Not sure how current the change is.
142
posted on
06/17/2013 5:11:39 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: 5th MEB
Some women I have met are probably physically capable and mentally capable; I have never met or seen those women and have no reason to think that they are in the military and ready to apply for a slot to SEAL school.
143
posted on
06/17/2013 5:12:00 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Social liberalism/libertarianism, empowers, creates and imports, and breeds, economic liberals.)
To: jazusamo
>>Another article I read earlier said the qualifications would not be lowered, I dont believe it for a second.<<
Don't. That's what flag officers said the year before women were admitted to the service academies.
144
posted on
06/17/2013 5:12:26 PM PDT
by
Jacquerie
(To restore the 10th Amendment, repeal the 17th.)
To: thefactor
I remember digging a whole above tree level at 13,000 feet is impossible. And those MREs sure make your #2 smell real bad. Enough on this matter said. ; )
145
posted on
06/17/2013 5:14:46 PM PDT
by
Chgogal
(Obama "hung the SEALs out to dry, basically exposed them like a set of dog balls..." CMH)
To: TADSLOS
Doesn’t apply to me. I did my four and got out. No pension, no restrictions. I am no longer subject to UCMJ, so I can criticize the boneheaded brainfarts coming from the Pentagon to my heart’s content.
146
posted on
06/17/2013 5:15:19 PM PDT
by
ought-six
( Multiculturalism is national suicide, and political correctness is the cyanide capsule.)
To: Steel Wolf
That was an excellent description.
147
posted on
06/17/2013 5:17:09 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(Social liberalism/libertarianism, empowers, creates and imports, and breeds, economic liberals.)
To: vetvetdoug
Thank you for stating the absolute truth!
LLS
148
posted on
06/17/2013 5:17:12 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: colorado tanker
An American woman SPECOPS would be a high value target for capture and for ALL of the evil reasons.
LLS
149
posted on
06/17/2013 5:19:58 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: Steel Wolf
Applying Big Army speech and living arrangement standards to SOF culture will annihilate it. People that seek out dangerous work are wired for assertive, outgoing behavior. Simply put, there isn't any way to square the concerns of modern policy with a warrior culture. They cannot coexist. Destroying the warrior culture to make room for modern policy concerns will cause most SOF operators to drift away into other lines of work. This is absolutely true and the nation will be weakened for it, which given the current Marxist regime, makes perfect sense.
150
posted on
06/17/2013 5:22:40 PM PDT
by
TADSLOS
(The Event Horizon has come and gone. Buckle up and hang on.)
To: Chgogal
Any large cat that ate any of them would surely die of food poisoning.
LLS
151
posted on
06/17/2013 5:25:24 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(FROM MY COLD, DEAD HANDS!)
To: jazusamo
While having female SEALs or Rangers may play well in Hollywood box office, in actual practice it would be about like having 15-year-old males of somewhat smaller than average physical stature in the team.
If you can’t put them in the football defense line, any potential candidate probably will wash out of the training on a purely physical basis, or the training would have to be so diluted as to be practically a failure when it comes to preparing for really demanding tasks. And it is not merely a matter of muscular strength. Smaller bodies are just more subject to traumatic damage when struck with massive forces.
When you send in the “A” team, you mean for them to win.
152
posted on
06/17/2013 5:25:38 PM PDT
by
alloysteel
(When did the government suddenly become our psycho ex-girlfriend? - Jay Leno)
To: Georgia Girl 2
SEALS and Rangers open to women. For what possible reason?
***
To destroy our military’s superior capability.
153
posted on
06/17/2013 5:30:31 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
To: 5th MEB
I agree with you they don’t belong in combat units with men anymore than openly gay guys do. Its just a bad idea. Sadly there are a lot of bad ideas being put into high gear with this fundamental transformation of America.
154
posted on
06/17/2013 5:32:13 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: Chgogal
If they do, there is no reason for signing up.
***
Bingo! That is the plan — turn away all of the real warriors in order to destroy our military.
155
posted on
06/17/2013 5:32:43 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
To: Georgia Girl 2
I was a Linguist in the USAF SS, actually.
156
posted on
06/17/2013 5:36:36 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economiws In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: Georgia Girl 2
Both of your BILs were Naval Officers as I was a Security Service linguist in the Air Force. It was a different world and a different USA then. The military did not freez honorably in place when your BILs left the Navy.It and the other Services have become something quite Other. My son is career army. He thinks the changes are insane. I don't think they are insane per se. They are what a sworn enemy of the USA would sanely do if he somehow got control.
157
posted on
06/17/2013 5:41:40 PM PDT
by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economiws In One Lesson ONLINE http://steshaw.org/econohttp://www.fee.org/library/det)
To: jazusamo
Report: Pentagon to open SEALs, Army Rangers to women ROTFL! There go the standards. I guess if it gets too tough though, they can always claim they were molested or sexually harassed. What a joke.
158
posted on
06/17/2013 5:44:55 PM PDT
by
FlingWingFlyer
(23,116,441 households on Food Stamps! Now that's what I call HISTORICAL!!!)
To: arthurus
I think the changes are insane also. I just don’t like to see this issue used as an exuse for derogatory slurs agans’t women. You expressly made two really disgusting references to women in the military and I just hope you as a former member of the service realize you were dissing your own. I don’t see anybody else on this thread talking like that. Just you Dude.
159
posted on
06/17/2013 5:52:24 PM PDT
by
Georgia Girl 2
(The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
To: centurion316
The point of all of this is to get the feminist vote....
&&&
If that were the point, it would not be so heartbreaking. No, the point is to destroy the military, plain and simple, be destroying the warrior culture.
160
posted on
06/17/2013 6:00:30 PM PDT
by
Bigg Red
(Restore us, O God of hosts; let your face shine, that we may be saved! -Ps80)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 201 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson