Skip to comments.
Report: Israeli Raid Likely Culprit For Destruction Of Russian Missiles In Syria
| Business Insider ^
| – 2 hours 6 minutes ago July 9, 2013
| By Geoffrey Ingersoll
Posted on 07/09/2013 11:04:32 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Israel will continue to DO what is necessary to survive.
They need not comment.
2
posted on
07/09/2013 11:08:19 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(Let his days be few; and let another take his office. Psalms 109:8)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Damn, and I had the Knights of Columbus in the office pool...
To: MestaMachine; Marine_Uncle; NormsRevenge; SJackson; TigersEye; onyx; justa-hairyape; SunkenCiv; ...
Major hit.
How dies Putin respond?
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
5
posted on
07/09/2013 11:10:14 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Slings and Arrows
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Israel needs to find a path where Israel, Russia and Assad all win. Assad has problems far bigger than Israel and one Russian ICBM on Tel Aviv would end Israel.
7
posted on
07/09/2013 11:12:31 AM PDT
by
Truth29
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Major hit. How dies Putin respond? It depends on whether Russia's been paid. If they have, he'll ask if the Syrians (or their backers) want to buy more.
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Thanks Reuters...you pos’s. Keep stirring.
9
posted on
07/09/2013 11:13:09 AM PDT
by
SueRae
(It isn't over. In God We Trust.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
-—I hope they can create a nuclear “accident” in Iran, one of these days-—
10
posted on
07/09/2013 11:18:07 AM PDT
by
rellimpank
(--don't believe anything the media or government says about firearms or explosives--)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The world is just a little bit better when Syria’s missile inventory is reduced. Seems a little odd to blame those pesky Israelis without solid proof.
11
posted on
07/09/2013 11:20:27 AM PDT
by
lurk
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
RE: "How does Putin respond?"
Most likely as they have in the psst. That they feel obligated to honor their military sales agreements with Syria. /sarc.
12
posted on
07/09/2013 11:20:43 AM PDT
by
Marine_Uncle
(Galt level is not far away......)
To: Truth29
Israel would counter punch with three subs that all carry nuclear weapons; all the players have so been advised of such, hence no one really wants (as a State or Nation) to have their capital city among others destroyed in a ball of fire. Turn about is fair play, an eye for an eye.
13
posted on
07/09/2013 11:21:04 AM PDT
by
Jumper
To: Truth29
Exactly right. Israel has a top notch military, That said, they aren’t going to beat up on the Russians Or even give them a spanking.They have been good at finding ways to get out of those situations where they find themselves between a “rock and a hard place”,and they need to do it once more..
14
posted on
07/09/2013 11:33:14 AM PDT
by
Quickgun
(I got here kicking,screaming and covered in someone else's blood. I can go out that way if I have to)
To: Jumper; Truth29
Israel would counter punch with three subs that all carry nuclear weapons; all the players have so been advised of such, hence no one really wants (as a State or Nation) to have their capital city among others destroyed in a ball of fire. Turn about is fair play, an eye for an eye. The phrase, "Never again!" in reference to the Shoah (Holcaust) is really incomplete. It really should read, "Never again...but if again, then not for free."
Surely, the Russkies aren't so stupid as to think that they'll get off scot-free for nuking Israel.
15
posted on
07/09/2013 11:39:52 AM PDT
by
Ancesthntr
("The right to buy weapons is the right to be free." A. E. van Vogt)
To: Truth29
Israel needs to find a path where Israel, Russia and Assad all win.Israel wants Assad out. Do you think they want to face a strong nationalist Syria with a large military and modern economy or do they want a broken up region of squabbling ethno-religious rump states ruled by backward militants? They want to have happen in Syria what the US/NATO did to Libya and Iraq.
The US/NATO is arming Al Qaeda in Syria to behead Christians and eat their hearts. Do you think this is being done for US national security interests?
To: ConservativeMan55
It was Captain Obvious’s day off.
17
posted on
07/09/2013 11:42:00 AM PDT
by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Israel will do whatever it needs to do to insure its safety and survival.
Russia knows this.
To: Count of Monte Fisto
I thought that the U.S.'s main beef with Assad II (before he started to fire on funeral processions) was his alliance with Iran.
The U.S. you know deposed an Iranian government in the early 1950s. They haven't forgotten.
But maybe you have someone else in mind to blame for everything.
19
posted on
07/09/2013 11:52:22 AM PDT
by
kenavi
(Debunk THIS!)
To: Pearls Before Swine
It depends on whether Russia's been paid. If they have, he'll ask if the Syrians (or their backers) want to buy more. You do not send weapons into a war zone before the check clears. Those missiles have been paid for.
20
posted on
07/09/2013 11:57:09 AM PDT
by
Greysard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-42 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson