Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sexual Destruction
ligonier.org ^ | 8/31/13 | RC Sproul, Jr.

Posted on 09/03/2013 2:09:18 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper

The serpent is more crafty than any of the beasts of the field. He attacks while retreating, retreating while attacking. He concedes this point, all the while making that point. He is both a tar baby and quicksilver. And we are fools for forgetting it...

...the hard truth is that evangelicals are sleeping with partners to whom they are not married. Hundreds of thousands of them, with barely a word even spoken...

The result is not merely immorality. The trouble with not keeping your pants on isn’t that you offend that great Prude in the sky. The problem is that it leads to death (Proverbs 7:27). How many of our grievous social ills trace their roots to the lie that we can have sex outside marriage with no great consequence? To put it another way, what would this world look like if there were no more adultery and fornication? Because families would be intact, ghettoes and the pathologies that come with them would fade away.

(Excerpt) Read more at ligonier.org ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: immorality; religion; truth
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: Gargantua

Gar,
Thanks.


21 posted on 09/03/2013 5:49:25 AM PDT by Big Red Badger ("don't hurt me , G 'man!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; SoFloFreeper; Jonty30; Alex Murphy; bkaycee; blue-duncan; boatbums; caww; ...
...the hard truth is that evangelicals are sleeping with partners to whom they are not married. Hundreds of thousands of them, with barely a word even spoken...

Does ANYONE have stats to back that up?????

Certainly sex outside of marriage is wrong and people are doing it, however, broad brushing an entire group is no way to build an argument.

22 posted on 09/03/2013 7:09:51 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pan_Yan
Numbers are very hard to determine. A large portion of the membership of most churches seldom or never attend. Of those that do attend only a small part tithe, which is a testament to their trust in God. So the author is probably right about hundreds of thousands of active church members living in sin. And you are probably correct about millions of total church members living in sin.

Thanks for pointing that out. *church members* does not by default mean truly born again believers.

Every church is filled with saved and unsaved. It's only the percentages which vary. Some have more saved, some have less.

But the other point raised is also valid. Jesus said lusting after a woman is the same as committing adultery (and the same applies to women who lust after another man), and that hating another is the same as murder.

The reason is that it's only a matter of how much self-control an individual has to avoid crossing the line from the mental to the physical.

Thank God for His grace that He's so willing to forgive and that our works do not either gain or lose us our salvation.

23 posted on 09/03/2013 7:20:09 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Gingersnap
I think the people quibbling over the actual numbers of sexually impure Christians are missing the greater message: we’ve normalized extra-marital sex in Christian culture.

Great point.

24 posted on 09/03/2013 7:20:51 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: metmom
Is any church today free of sin? I think not. You could easily broad-brush the majority of society today regardless of what church they attend or not. There are few things which distinguish the difference between christian and not.

The US culture, and for that matter the entire Western culture, has shifted to where few, if any, acts are considered sinful. There is no shame any longer for behavior rather it's how can it be excused or justified in a secular society...gays and transvestites parade down our streets...(”They strut their evil before you”) with no public out cry.

Many people wear the title of one religion or another...it's fashionable now to dive into Eastern religions and label yourself as practicing such.....and be fully acceptable in US.

I mention these things because the sexual revolution is seen now as perfectly legit ‘by the majority’... who really have no sense of biblical truth. So it's within ‘all’ churches as well....there is ‘nothing’ which is resisting it......

25 posted on 09/03/2013 8:02:49 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: metmom; Lera; Springfield Reformer; Pan_Yan; caww
Certainly sex outside of marriage is wrong and people are doing it, however, broad brushing an entire group is no way to build an argument.

This is true, but what percentage would be more pertinent, while Scripture says it should not even occur once.

As regards defining "evangelical," Barna's criteria is superior, as it defines them according to distinctiveness which evangelicalism was defined by, as a movement against liberalism. By such criteria only 8% of Americans are evangelical, as with some other polls, the Economist estimated in May 2012 that "over one-third of Americans, more than 100m, can be considered evangelical," arguing that the percentage is often undercounted because many black Christians espouse Evangelical theology but prefer to refer to themselves as "born again Christians" rather than "evangelical." (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelicalism#Demographics)

In contrast, according to one pollsters criteria, Thirty-seven percent of all Christians describe themselves as born-again or evangelical; that includes nearly half of all Protestants (47 percent)" and "two-thirds of blacks describe themselves as evangelical or born-again Christians, double the share of whites who do so" (http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90356&page=1), yet in reality very few, black or white, actually describe themselves as evangelical, but pollsters classify evangelical or born-again as one class, which includes 14% of Catholics who called themselves born again far more than evangelical.

But white evangelical/born-again people are listed as a class by itself by Pew Research, and for black evangelical/born-again Americans race and welfare considerations usually trump evangelical faith.

26 posted on 09/03/2013 8:22:30 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
The trouble with not keeping your pants on isn’t that you offend that great Prude in the sky.

On the contrary! The trouble with fornication IS that it is an offense against God!

Or does the author think all the death, diseases, and destruction he describes are BLESSINGS sent upon the OBEDIENT?? They are the consequences for "offending that great Prude in the sky" - and he refers to our God.

More study of the Old Testament might help him understand "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God". (Also recommended is a book by S. I. McMillen, M.D. called "None of These Diseases".)

Or perhaps a reading of Romans 1:18-32 might present us a "time-lapse" view of sin running its course in an individual, a community, a nation. After the final, disgusting scene has been played out, we'd be wise to recall that it all begins by refusing to admit God's proper place.

Yes, "the trouble with not keeping your pants on" is that it is sin. All that follows from that sin follows BECAUSE it is sin.
27 posted on 09/03/2013 9:23:49 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The destructive effects of fornication are built into our design by the Creator.

So is the natural desire to marry at age 14.

This vast anti-Creation experiment of unmarried persons of the opposite sex working together and living in proximity outside of their father’s homes in their millions from ages 18-30, while remaining unmarried, is not working to the Creator’s purpose and has had the entirely predictable consequence.

Whether someone is “Evangelical” or “Catholic” or “Just Christian”, to frustrate the Creator’s purpose for the sexual faculty for 10-15 years while it is strongest is a formula for disaster, which is what we have.


Your entire post bears repeating!
28 posted on 09/03/2013 9:26:56 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Lera
To many pastors that lead churches which were once considered Evangelical are not even believers and no longer teach the truth and you can’t expect their congregations to have changed hearts and lives

True, but if they are least taught to esteem Scripture as the basically literal word of God then they can be led out of such "churches." And at least we can separate from liberal churches and members, while RCs are stuck with a church which treats such souls as members in life and in death, as often said and exampled.

29 posted on 09/03/2013 9:30:56 AM PDT by daniel1212 (Come to the Lord Jesus as a contrite damned+destitute sinner, trust Him to save you, then live 4 Him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
This vast anti-Creation experiment of unmarried persons of the opposite sex working together and living in proximity outside of their father’s homes in their millions from ages 18-30, while remaining unmarried, is not working to the Creator’s purpose and has had the entirely predictable consequence.

So what do you propose be done? Segregate men and women? Cover the women in burkas? What? You never heard of self-control?

Are people just animals who can't help themselves?

The natural desire for sex beings in the early teen years, but that is not the same as the natural desire to marry. Additionally, a girl's body is not mature enough physically to handle pregnancy until she's about 18.

Blaming the culture for an individual's poor life choices is blame shifting and enabling.

30 posted on 09/03/2013 10:05:25 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: metmom
You never heard of self-control?

Haha! That's a bit naive, don't you think?

You remind me of a teenager - who's already been picked up once for underage drinking - protesting against her parents' curfew: "What's the matter, don't you trust me??"

Sure, we've all heard of self-control. It's a mythical creature which exists only in the pleadings of those who're trying to get by with something. :-)
31 posted on 09/03/2013 10:38:20 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool

Gee, somehow it worked pretty well before our culture embraced the sexual revolution.

People will rise to the level of expectations.

Expect them to have no self-control, and they’ll do that.

Hand out condoms and abortions, and why should they even think about it?

Um, yes, self- control, and no, it’s not naive.


32 posted on 09/03/2013 11:20:17 AM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: metmom

I would agree: Low expectations, the sexual revolution, and the handing out of condoms and abortions have had a detrimental effect on sexual morality in this nation.

That’s not “blaming the culture for an individual’s poor life choices.” It’s blaming the culture for seducing young men and women into fornication.

To expect that the young in their sexual prime will “just exercise some self-control” in the throes of this seduction is naive. One has only to look at the number of abortions, unwed pregnancies, and venereal diseases to see that self-control isn’t working.

This is, IMHO, the folly of “abstinence education”. Everyone is CAPABLE of self-control, sure. But not many will exercise it in these circumstances. Our social problem lies in our culture, and therefore will not be solved with a “just say no” pledge campaign.

In the current environment, most young people simply aren’t going to exercise self-control. It’s like setting a bowl of beef & gravy three feet in front of your dog, and then telling him to “STAY!”. How long after you leave the room do you think he’ll be able to resist?

And afterward, what’re you going to do? Yell at him for being a bad dog and disobedient? Or blame yourself for setting him up to fail?


33 posted on 09/03/2013 12:01:58 PM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
This is, IMHO, the folly of “abstinence education”. Everyone is CAPABLE of self-control, sure. But not many will exercise it in these circumstances. Our social problem lies in our culture, and therefore will not be solved with a “just say no” pledge campaign.

Someone has to take that stand to turn the tide.

The *folly* or abstinence education*???

And you propose what? To just let them do what they want? Offer nothing better? Hand out condoms figuring you can't fight city hall?

34 posted on 09/03/2013 2:06:04 PM PDT by metmom ( For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: txrefugee
:”Now the works of the flesh are evident: sexual immorality, impurity, .....those who do such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.”

NIV translates it such:

" 9. Do you not know that the wicked will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor male prostitutes nor homosexual offenders 10. nor thieves nor the greedy nor drunkards nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God.

35 posted on 09/03/2013 4:31:18 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
Jesus went on to say that, if we so much as call our brother "stupid," it is the same to God as if we murdered them.

Oh?


http://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%205%3A22

36 posted on 09/03/2013 4:35:06 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: metmom

The problem is huge and must be addressed from many angles. There is no easy way to get out of the pit. Individuals, if well brought up and receptive to their up bringing, and not falling prey to bad influences, may be able to escape the net or web of sexual sin.

But the culture must change. And early marriage needs to make a come back.


37 posted on 09/03/2013 10:27:01 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
Sort of. The point is that as far as God is concerned, sin is sin. From a human perspective, insulting your brother is nowhere near as bad as killing him, but to God, both are sins.

This is the point Jesus was making. From the NIV:

"...anyone who says, ‘You fool!’ will be in danger of the fire of hell."

In danger of Hell's fire, just the same as if you killed someone. Got it?

I knew you did.

8^)

38 posted on 09/04/2013 9:05:05 AM PDT by Gargantua ("Da amber lamps. Bring dem..." LMFFAO!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
The point is that as far as God is concerned, sin is sin.

That's what the book says.

39 posted on 09/04/2013 4:50:12 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Gargantua
...insulting your brother is nowhere near as bad as killing him, but to God, both are sins.

Oh?

Since when?

Jesus seemed to 'insult' the Pharisees quite regularly.

Does HE get a pass that I don't?

40 posted on 09/04/2013 4:51:26 PM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson