And I’m sure Ann’s dream lover, Mitt Romney, IS looking out for the future of the GOP. /sarc
That’s an odd list from where I am sitting. Did she mention McCain, Rove, and the rest of the limp-wristed republicans?
It will be interesting to see how this book sells...
Coulter has apparently reached the point of too much MEDICATION. She’s no longer in touch.
Ouch!
Her list is going to bite a few FReepers.
LOL
The trouble is, for the GOP, the list is a lot longer, and should include anyone who has been in business with anyone inside the beltway.
They, like their counterparts across the aisle, are more interested in their own sustenance and upkeep than they are about the rest of the nation outside the beltway.
==
Coulter, however, like several supposed expert commentators, lost credibility in the last presidential election cycle.
I’ll hand her Todd Akin and Mark “The Poet” Sanford but, Newt Gingrich and Liz Cheney bring ideas to the table that make sense and are not willing to go along to get along.
Deliberately threw 2010 Senate election
Made the mistake of clicking on the Blaze article and got two annoying pop-ups that shut down my browser.
One of the things I like about FR is just about the only conservative site that doesn’t run a ton of script and pop-up ads.
You name Liz Cheney, Gingrich, Sanford and Akin (who's he?) in your article, loser names that are not exactly on everyone's front burner at the moment.
When you list Karl Rove and other Republicans-in-name that are on the tube night and day spreading poison, then I'll pay attention to what you're saying.
Leni
I don’t find Coulter relevant any more.
“the problem is we have hucksters, shysters, people ripping off the Republican party for their own self-aggrandizement, for their own egos, to make money.”
She just described herself perfectly.
Her “shyster” comment was about the consultant class, blaming them for soliciting running from those she deems “unelectable”. Her point is taken, but only up to a point and not beyond.
It’s not up to Coulter to say who is and isn’t electable. She slammed Christine O’Donnell - again. Blathering her lip service that she “loved” Christine O’Donnell and there were many states in which she could have won but Delaware wasn’t one of them, according to Coulter. This is where she proves she’s a RINO in her black heart (and lungs). The Delaware GOP nominated her - THEY wanted her regardless of the Rove Coulter hit jobs on her. And lest we forget, Coulter slams Gingrich as completely unelectable, and screams daily the virtues of first Christie (has anyone made her eat crow for that yet?) and then the Romney debacles. She even tried to mischararcterize the Reagan success in 1984 having carried these states due to his “pro life” stance. Uh, no Ann. Reagan was pro life but that’s not why he carried the nation in 1984. He was pro small government, pro America and pro AMERICAN exceptionalism, he was undeterred about taking on Democrats head on and believed in low taxes for everyone and NOT because government prospers because of it - his guide to lowering taxes was to benefit WE THE PEOPLE, not Uncle Sam’s coffers.
Everyone should just stop buying her books. Hopefully her lender will foreclose on her West Palm Beach pad :)
Wasn’t Ann herself beating the “only Romney can win” drum every day?
If you’re looking for a problem with the GOP Ann, look in the mirror.
She's one of them.
I am SO over both Ann Coulter and Sean Hannity. I stopped watching Hannity recently when I finally grew weary of his practice of bringing “balance” by inviting liberal guests on who constantly talk over other guests along with conservative guests who are polite and allow themselves to be talked over.
And many of the “conservative” guests he brought were RINOs spending more time putting down conservatives and far less time putting down liberals.
It just became overwhelmingly annoying.
I heard her interviewed on Hannity and Beck yesterday, and she’s not making a lot of sense these days.
And if I hear her talk about “really smart people” again, I’m gonna slap her.
Once we accept her as entertainment diversion, it will be easier to cope with her lack of consistency and hyperbole.