To: Sam's Army
Ethel?
Guilty. Just based on having a grandma name.
~shudder~
2 posted on
12/11/2013 6:27:24 AM PST by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
6 posted on
12/11/2013 6:30:07 AM PST by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: Responsibility2nd
Ethel?I thought they banned her in the eighties?
30 posted on
12/11/2013 6:42:56 AM PST by
Navy Patriot
(Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Her parents were chemists.
Her sisters are Methyl and Propyl.
34 posted on
12/11/2013 6:59:54 AM PST by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have Ingsoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Guilty. Just based on having a grandma name. LOL. Kind of a non sequitur...If you want yet another reason to be married to the woman who is bearing your child, I know someone who got his casual girlfriend pregnant. She insisted on naming the baby "Edgar." Might be OK for a person of color, but not if you're white, blue collar, middle America. When he suggested they name him something that not get him beat up on the playground, she was highly offended. And over his objections, she named that poor child Edgar.
51 posted on
12/11/2013 7:40:35 AM PST by
Hoffer Rand
(If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. *Asterisk.*)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
