[xzins]

NYTimes attempts to rewrite history for Obama.

They even claim (again) that it was caused by the mohammed video.

[TomGuy]

Some scrubbing in case Hillary decides to run in 2016.

[Blood of Tyrants]

Are the STILL sticking to the story about the anti-Islamic film that no even heard of until after Benghazi?

[jazusamo]

The Slimes are running interference for 0bama and Shillary.

[WeatherGuy]

Sorry Peter, you lie with libs and you have NO right to complain.

[Doogle]

HEY KING....WHY AREN’T YOU DEMANDING AN INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION INTO BENGHAZI?

[McGruff]

Peter King. Who could have guessed.[/sarc] Bet he was part of the coverup.

[blueunicorn6]

The New York Times.....paid liars for the Democrat party.

[Rodamala]

“Hope has returned to the hearts of scores of millions of men and women, and with that hope there burns the flame of anger against the brutal, corrupt invader. And still more fiercely burn the fires of hatred and contempt for the filthy Quislings whom he has suborned.”

~Winston Churchill, 12/26/1941

[FR_addict]

I was wondering why they sent Susan Rice out yet again to do the 60 minutes interview. Now I know.

They are rewriting history. I think Petraeus should be made to come before the Investigative committees and tell us where the video story originated.

[upchuck]

Think hard about this. When you put your children to bed at night, do you really want Hillary to be in charge of their safety till morning?

[M Kehoe]

Doesn't little Pinch know there is an Internet? Doesn't the NYT editorial czars know that there is congressional testimony? Don't they know that the black flag of al-Queda flies over Benghazi? Don't they know that there were attacks before this one? Don't they know that there is radio/electronic traffic recorded from that night? Don't they know...never mind...

Don't they care about four dead Americans?

I'm getting a headache.

If I'm an 0bama supporter I would have to ask myself, which pill should I take, the red or blue one this time?

5.56mm

[Yaelle]

This is a big deal and deserves more fight from us than just echo chamber grumbling on this thread.

This is our entire problem in this country.

The NYT piece is well written and illustrated with bold photography, video, and maps. There are chapters where the article appears to deal with various "rumors" to do with Benghazi.

THIS IS THE PIECE THAT CEMENTS THE "TRUTH" ABOUT BENGHAZI INTO AMERICAN HISTORY. If we don't fight it right now, it will be the truth.

Phrases like "the Times researched for many months" or "the truth was more complicated than that" solve curiosity in most Americans' minds.

The only way to fight anything in this article is to step up factual refutations with footnotes (which this article does not have) and point by point disprove these allegations. And not on Rush Limbaugh's show or Sean Hannity's. The fight has to be LOUD AND BIG and dwarf the fight over Phil Robertson's freedom of speech.

The rest of this thread should hopefully focus on nuts and bolts directions on how to fight this, or else we deserve President Hillary Clinton.

Care now, or don't care at all.

[Carriage Hill]

NYTimes article:

http://www.nytimes.com/projects/2013/benghazi/?hp#/?chapt=0

[Yaelle]

People. (Not you, xsins). Go to the NYT and read the comments.

Most think this is an excellent, amazing article with wonderful deeply researched reporting.

Many report that they are glad to finally know the truth.

HOW WILL WE EVER BE ABLE TO FIGHT THIS?

[Tzimisce]

...didn’t they raise the al Queda battle flag outside the embassy?????????????????????????

[GOPJ]

I remember when Republicans feared the New York Times... thank God that time is over.

[FreeReign]

Need to see the Fox transcript of the King interview. I suspect that this is Peter King misdirection.

The article makes no mention of King disagreeing with the NY Times about the Hillary lie that the "video made them do it".

King has always been allied with the Clintons and I think he's been covering for the Hillary lie since the beginning.

[Lazamataz]

On the VERY topmost position of the list, is the New York Times.

They are first.

[narses]

+

Freep-mail me to get on or off my pro-life and Catholic List:

Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to note-worthy Pro-Life or Catholic threads, or other threads of general interest.