Posted on 01/29/2014 2:02:08 PM PST by RKBA Democrat
Unless Paul has a PLAN to bring 12,000,000 jobs to the USA, he is just blowing in the wind.
That's getting more obvious with each passing day. Which country is he now running for president, Mexico or Guatemala?
I won’t vote for Paul, but I want very much to vote for Cruz!
Impossible to do without stifling regulations and crippling a free market
“Unless Paul has a PLAN to bring 12,000,000 jobs to the USA, he is just blowing in the wind.”
I think he highlighted his plan pretty well: economic freedom zones will help.
I would be happy with Ted Cruz or Rand Paul. But I happen to think that Rand Paul is better positioned to win should he choose to run.
The whole country should be a freedom zone
But not everyone on the right is consistent about wanting a more responsible government. Unfortunately, when it comes to consistency in wanting a more responsible gov’t, right now small l libertarians have the market cornered. Those on the right can still work to completely change this, will they?
I’d be willing to vote for either Rand Paul or Ted Cruz; would partly depend upon who’s running against them.
Too bad those libertarians aren’t bright enough to know how much they harm themselves every stinking time trying to grab the credit.
Paul is a amnesty supporter. While he was running for Senate he actually brought up doing away with birthright citizenship. He changed his tune pretty quickly.
“The whole country should be a freedom zone.”
Agreed. But I’ll take what I can get. Let’s not let the perfect be the enemy of the pretty good.
Funny thing that. Paul is proclaiming about the same as Reagan did. And yet we have those on here that claim they will not vote for him. I wonder if they did not vote for Reagan? Most likely many were not even alive back then. I for one, remember Reagan way back in the 60s. He was said to be a radical. Well then if proclaiming a road to liberty is radical, then Paul should make the most of it, like Reagan did.
I ain’t voting for pro-amnesty Rand Paul with his libertopian lean under any circumstances. His plan is stupid, dividing up the country into zones. I believe that laws, taxes and regulations should apply equally to all, the federal government has no business playing favorites.
Abolishing equal protection under law is not “pretty good”
“Paul is a amnesty supporter. While he was running for Senate he actually brought up doing away with birthright citizenship. He changed his tune pretty quickly.”
I think we’re getting shamnesty regardless. For Paul it’s consistent with his political philosophy. I don’t agree with all of what he says, but if what we’re facing is the likely choice between him, piaps, and jabba....
“Abolishing equal protection under law is not “pretty good”
I don’t see it in those terms. The US has established enterprise zones in places. This takes it a step further. The places where this would apply to I believe are extremely impoverished or really horrible. South central L.A. for example. And you would have to live there to take advantage of it. Would you move to south central to take advantage of something like this? I sure wouldn’t.
why should downtown LA get better treatment than a place that is not a hell hole?
Since Rand Paul endorsed Mitch McConnell, the GOP-E candidate for Senator in Kentucky over the Tea-Party candidate Matt Bevin, I no longer trust him.
Factor in his own Amnesty plan, and this guy can’t be trusted.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.