Sore loses never win:
Posted on 04/03/2014 2:36:01 AM PDT by kingattax
Paul Ryan is dropping in likeability as he falls asleep at the wheel in Washington DC and proposes a crappy budget that increases spending yet again far from demonstrating any responsibility in governing.
It’s so bad that Sarah Palin ranted about it on her Facebook page yesterday.
(Excerpt) Read more at rightwingnews.com ...
You can only make at most a two year budget. One Congress can not bind another Congress. That is why all this 10 year BS is just that BULL$HIT.
Spend now, pay later, what a GREAT plan there Paul! Why don’t you just sit down and STFU.
From the poorness of McCain as a candidate, and the unpopularity of Iraq in 2008, and the debt crisis and failing economy, and then with the emergency 'Sky is falling' TARP bailout blank check bill (that Bush_ Paulson pushed) , I couldn't see how McCain could win, fair election or not.
Keep in mind the lib base accused GWB of stealing BOTH his elections, they even posted a ‘Im sorry world’ website after 2004.
Irrelevant.
How does McCain loosing in 2008 make it irrelevant as to whether or not Zippo won through voter fraud in 2012?
You lost me.
My mistake, I thought you posted 2008.
In 2012 Obama had a huge advantage from the start, no primary, no primary debates, while Romney was getting beat up and taking some silly positions to win that first.
Romney was also a pretty crappy candidate to run, and Newt started the Bain theme for Obama.
And then there was Tod Akin moments and then Romney's 47% vid to his $$$ donors that sealed it, and Romney was scared to beat Obama up on Benghazi in the last two debates.
Another set of disasters for GOP.
by Sept 1st, I fully expected Romney to lose in November .
I was pointing out that each party claims fraud now when they lose a major POTUS election, 2000, 2004, 2008 and now 2012.
Yet I noticed the fraud goes away magically in 2010 and 2014 when GOP wins,
who-da-guessed?
I too expected him to win in September, but the date was Sept 12.
He had to win to cover up Benghazi, which would explain the massive voter fraud.
It would be nice to hold the line on spending, rather than increase. Once again, it’s compromise on one side only. Very frustrating.
LOL, he didn't have to try hard, Romney was too scared to bring it up in the last two debates and many freepers here agreed with him that he should NOT bring it up. I can find those threads easily.
Karl Rove said he was sure that Romney would win, Dick Morris said it was 100% certain
Who can argue with those two?
If there is over 100% voter participation in a dem controlled district which repubs have no control that’s a good indication of dem voter fraud because repubs don’t have any control they don’t have the ability to commit voter fraud.
OK? You follow this so far?
When dems claim voter fraud because somehow repubs have taken control of a dem controlled district without anyone knowing it and rigged the vote, it’s bunk or the dems rigged the vote themselves.
Did you bother to notice it was the Clintons that started the “Bush stole the election” in 2000 and it was also Bill Clinton that got sued for “voter disenfranchisement” while he was Gov. of Arkansas?
In other words the 2 people, 1 of which was known for voter disenfranchisement, that had what was called a “20 year plan”, meaning BC would be president 8 years, 4 years for another president, then HC would be president 8 years (8+4+8=20) had to come up with a plan not only to make sure Gore didn’t get elected but a plan to bring down a sitting president and keep him at one term.
You think it’s possible if there was in fact voter fraud in dem controlled districts in the 2000 election it might have come from the 2 people already associated with voter fraud and also had a vested interest in making sure Gore didn’t get elected?
Did you also bother to notice after the 2004 election bin Laden put out a tape in which the objective of the 9/11 attack was to bring down a sitting president?
I got an idea, maybe bin Laden was so in touch with the news he just picked up on the Clintons 20 year plan from the news and “spontaneously” planned the 9/11 attack to help Hillary get into the WH.
Well if its a liberal district (like Baltimore city) then it doesn't matter if 150% vote, its not making a difference.
Unlike Romney, Obama campaign worked on getting Dems to vote in swing states.
You do know the entire vote of the state is counted for a presidential and senate race don’t you?
50% extra votes from a district can make a big difference.
so can the conservative base staying home on election day, I don't recall liberals saying they would stay home to protest Obama.
One of the facts that really poo-pooed the “Romney really won” claims is when GOP governors won their states that Romney lost, on the same ballos.
For me, it’s not about perfection. It’s about not being a closet socialist (Romney), a moderate (McCain), or an authoritarian (Ryan). I would happily line up behind Paul, Cruz, Palin, Perry (lots of P’s there) - I could even vote for Bachmann. But I won’t support socialism, or authoritarianism. Just trying to win isn’t good enough. Just trying to beat the Democrats isn’t good enough. I only vote for people who I agree with on economic and legal principles.
Yeh. I didn’t support Romney/Ryan because of their socialist/authoritarian tendencies, and the budget is no exception. I pulled no punches (even openly mocking the Romneybots here on FR) and I won’t play nice this year or 2016 - or ever, for that matter.
AHAHA, its folks like you who are complicating the ‘Romney lost by fraud’ themes.
Just remember, Dem light is still better then a Dem.
Its like diet coke.
If there was vote fraud dems staying home wouldn’t make a difference.
Did the meaning of fraud go over the top of your head?
Sore loses never win:
mittens was nominated to fail from the beginning...
but i knew it was really over when he stepped on his own d!ck by insulting anybody that wasnt a rich elite snob...47% anyone???
i believe that even that remark was pretty much scripted to tank his [lack of] candidacy...
ryans wimpy gimmick was a joke from the start, as anyone that has an ounce of sense could see, being as though the spending was today, and the *cuts* cant be mandated on CONgress 5 elections away...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.