Replies

To: freedumb2003

Scientists don't generally post about legal matters...

Perhaps, but lawyers are experts in EVIDENCE.

6 posted on 04/04/2014 5:50:39 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)

To: P-Marlowe

>>Perhaps, but lawyers are experts in EVIDENCE<<

If a lawyer had billions of physical pieces of evidence that can be linked in a logical unassailable manner, would that suffice?

I know you are a lawyer — would you be OK with someone arguing Promissary Esstoppel without even understanding Consideration?

People seem to think an uneducated opinion is as valid as one based in subject knowledge.

8 posted on 04/04/2014 5:54:41 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)

To: P-Marlowe

"Perhaps, but lawyers are experts in EVIDENCE."

Not really. They know about the rules of evidence in a courtroom, but that's not even close to the same thing.

153 posted on 04/17/2014 1:34:13 PM PDT by mlo

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794