Replies

To: P-Marlowe

>>Perhaps, but lawyers are experts in EVIDENCE<<

If a lawyer had billions of physical pieces of evidence that can be linked in a logical unassailable manner, would that suffice?

I know you are a lawyer — would you be OK with someone arguing Promissary Esstoppel without even understanding Consideration?

People seem to think an uneducated opinion is as valid as one based in subject knowledge.

8 posted on 04/04/2014 5:54:41 PM PDT by freedumb2003 (Fight Tapinophobia in all its forms! Do not submit to arduus privilege.)

To: freedumb2003

If a lawyer had billions of physical pieces of evidence that can be linked in a logical unassailable manner, would that suffice?

Every piece of that evidence is fully and wholly consistent with a theory of intelligent design.

13 posted on 04/04/2014 6:00:29 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)

To: freedumb2003

People seem to think an uneducated opinion is as valid as one based in subject knowledge.

Sometimes an expert is worse than an ignoramus.

In regard to AGW the experts in the subject literally know less than the guy who picks up your garbage every Tuesday.

17 posted on 04/04/2014 6:07:56 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (There can be no Victory without a fight and no battle without wounds)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794