Bush! Bush! Boosh! George Booosh!
Any white person would be dumb as heck to vote for Clinton. One word. Shamnesty.
Ain’t buy’n it.
11 days ago. She took a whipping this week. Nobody feels sorry for her and that means the Democrats won’t nominate her.
Why and how are the leftists always so concerned about “our problems?” Shut up and worry about your own. This is projection.
Sarah Palin.
Just saying...
B/S
I think Hilliary’s the Dem’s Bob Dole of 2016 with “It’s my turn”. I think she stepped aside in 2008 with the promise of full backing from Democratic party (yes that include media).
Hill’s problem is the Dems including the media are dishonest by definition. If they don’t think they can drag her fat butt across the finish line, they’ll cut and run in a heartbeat.
Sorry, Hilliary. it’s the Chicago way :-)
It will be women who think this is a history making. opportunity to get a woman in the White House. It is simple as that.
I wouldn’t worry too much about this kind of thing, regardless of name recognition and such at this point, white voters are the portion of the electorate most likely to actually watch the primaries and hear the arguments, and many of them will shift away from Hillary as the campaigns set to work and the facts start becoming more known.
In the end, Hillary won’t be winning the white vote, unless we do something really stupid, something so stupid that it is romneyesque.
Gee, I thought the key to winning a presidential election was the non-white vote.
As I always pointed out to my (former) Leftist friends, EVERY WOMAN to accuse Bill Clinton of rape, groping, molesting, etc., was a DEMOCRAT. They don’t care. All they are interested in is the power.
It’s 2014. There’s no opponent. This is meaningless even if Hillary is the most likely winner. Way too early to prognosticate anything
Ready for my closeup, voters...
“Recent polls show Hillary Clinton running well among white voters overall...”
Maybe single white women. Historically, married white women & white men vote Republican. By race, 59% of whites voted for Romney in 2012. White men voted for Romney at 62%.
” In 2004, Bush got fifty-five per cent of the white female vote, and Kerry got forty-four per cent—a “reverse gender gap” (one working in the G.O.P.’s favor) of eleven points. In 2008, McCain got fifty-three per cent of the white female vote, and Obama got forty-six per cent—a gap of seven points. Compared to four years earlier, the reverse gender gap in this demographic had decreased by four points, indicating that the Democrats were making progress in attracting the votes of white women. But this year, that trend turned around again. Far from narrowing further, the reverse gender gap among white women widened to fourteen points. Romney got fifty-six per cent of the white female vote; Obama got just forty-two per cent.”
http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/johncassidy/2012/11/why-white-women-voted-for-romney.html
From the same link, why did Obama win in 2012?
“Ninety-six per cent of black women voted for Obama; seventy-six per cent of Hispanic women voted for him; and so did sixty-six per cent of women of other races, including Asians.”
The married divide worked this way:
“Nearly a quarter of the voters in Tuesday’s election were unmarried women – and Obama captured more than two-thirds of their votes, 67%, according to research...Mitt Romney actually did better than Obama among married women, outperforming the president by seven points.”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/09/single-women-voted-favour-obama
Sorry, but I’m not buying the idea that Hillary is attractive to white women voters.
Early frontrunner for Dems has not won primaries and nomination but a handful of times in US history when it was a non incumbent POTUS primary season
Last time was 1960.
Hillary has negatives off the scales.....scandal laden history....unlikable chinny strident female and debates and interviews poorly
Her only hope is that Democrat constituency will vote or whomever it is.
