Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton says much of what is written about her is “Inaccurate or unimportant to me”
Accuracy In Media ^ | July 2 2014 | Don Irvine

Posted on 07/02/2014 8:34:14 AM PDT by PoloSec

Hillary Clinton’s book tour hasn’t been the love-fest with the media that she was counting on. As a matter of fact, it has been something of a disaster. During an interview with Steve Scully of C-SPAN, set to air this weekend on BookTV, according to Politico, he asked Hillary if she follows everything that’s written about her.

Clinton: I can’t, Steve. I can’t. It’s just overwhelming. I can’t do it. So I skim it. If it’s important it will come to me, I assume. A lot of it is inaccurate or unimportant to me. I try to keep up with it, but I can’t possibly read it all. I would be doing nothing else.

As the presumptive Democratic nominee for president in 2016, Clinton thought the media would fawn over her book tour, and that it would serve as a test launch for her presumed presidential run in 2016.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: hillarybooktour
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

1 posted on 07/02/2014 8:34:14 AM PDT by PoloSec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

I am left wondering — do the Democrats really want the Clintons in 2016??? This book tour was a disaster. Book sales are tanking. There are lots of negative Clinton stories in the media recently.

I’ve heard that the Clintons are not exactly loved by many Democrats. And they see Hillary as sucking all the oxygen out of the room. And they see Hillary as blocking their own presidential ambitions for the next 10 years. You figure if Hillary runs and wins in 2016, she would run for re-election in 2020. So then the next open Democrat presidential nomination would be in 2024, ten years from now. Some Democrats also feel the Clintons aren’t liberal enough for them.

Add it all up, and I would expect someone to come out and challenge the Clintons for president.


2 posted on 07/02/2014 8:38:18 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Actually, I can’t blame her for not reading all of that negative stuff. If she took it seriously, how could she get out of bed in the morning? And how could she contemplate running for office?

Better to stay cocooned, out of touch with the voters, the “little people,” as the BP CEO so eloquently called Americans on the Gulf Coast.

The real question is, do the big donors read those reports?


3 posted on 07/02/2014 8:39:56 AM PDT by Veto! (OpInions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Hmmm.....10% untrue and maybe 90% true and she doesn’t care? Who knows?


4 posted on 07/02/2014 8:44:01 AM PDT by sevinufnine (A moderately bad man knows he is not very good. A thoroughly bad man thinks he's alright. C.S. Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Veto!

I think it would be best if she read all of what is written about her. That would depress her badly...and who knows what she might do.


5 posted on 07/02/2014 8:44:32 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Will Hillary sit down for Big Bird, Bert & Ernie next?

Make it stop, already!

6 posted on 07/02/2014 8:45:50 AM PDT by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Trying to keep an objective viewpoint, I have found that there is something lacking in her personality.....shame.....she has none. Beyond that, she has not taken very controversial stances on anything except, “What difference does it make now?” and that was a complete disaster for her. In addition, she seems to try to be a ‘vanilla’ personality but in reality is as phony as a three-dollar bill. I am wondering why that phoniness does not show through for anyone who views her objectively.


7 posted on 07/02/2014 8:46:42 AM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Why does every totalitarian political hack think that he knows how to run my life better than I do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Right, because someone who publishes two biographies in a 10 year span isn’t concerned what others think of them.


8 posted on 07/02/2014 8:47:26 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hal ogen
and who knows what she might do.

LOL. Oh, the possibilities. Become the first female Unabomber?

9 posted on 07/02/2014 8:48:37 AM PDT by Veto! (OpInions freely dispensed as advice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Yes.
That young Marine whose face she threw hot coffee on was obviously unimportant to her.


10 posted on 07/02/2014 8:48:39 AM PDT by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free..... Even robots will kill for it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

I, for one, believe much of what David Brock wrote about her in American Spectator....many years ago.

Not flattering!


11 posted on 07/02/2014 8:49:04 AM PDT by G Larry (Which of Obama's policies do you think I'd support if he were white?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

It’s the facts that get her upset.


12 posted on 07/02/2014 8:49:10 AM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

A BIG problem in this country is that people cannot believe what IS happening under the Democrats/Obama CAN happen in THIS country. It HAPPENS to OTHER countries, NOT America, and the news media, whatever the type of media contributes to the confusion, thus the chaos.

Clinton is NOT BAAAD Obama, therefore in the mind of the LIV whose brains are permanently skewed thanks to Leftist Democrat propaganda she’s GOOD, AND she would be the first woman President in history, and what a great day it will be for history sayeth they of the glazed over eyes.

We have to make more believers out of they. It’s happening, and Hillary is part of the BAAD, NOT the GOOD.


13 posted on 07/02/2014 8:49:13 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will. They ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Hillary Clinton says much of what is written about her is “Inaccurate or unimportant to me”

Apparently much of what is written BY her is inaccurate and unimportant to others!

Nobody is buying it!

14 posted on 07/02/2014 8:54:28 AM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

With her bovine eyes, and tuck-n’-roll face that sags like a Juarez upholstery job, Hillary is as stoic as a vandalized statue when she reads stories of herself.


15 posted on 07/02/2014 8:57:38 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Hillary Clinton says much of what is written about her is “Inaccurate or unimportant to me”

...which would include all of the accurate or important stuff, I guess.
16 posted on 07/02/2014 8:57:48 AM PDT by Milton Miteybad (I am Jim Thompson. {Really.})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

Her daughter - making $600,000 a year - doesn’t care about money either... And Bill ‘never had sex with THAT woman’... either...

I think this runs in the family...


17 posted on 07/02/2014 8:58:07 AM PDT by GOPJ (Why no outrage over IRS targeting? Same reason Pravda didn't make a stink about gulags.FREnterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec

“Fiddle dee dee.” scoffed Scarlett O’Cankles
“Tomorra’s anotha day!”


18 posted on 07/02/2014 9:05:26 AM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PoloSec
Hillary Clinton says much of what is written about her is “Inaccurate or unimportant to me”

Ha! Imagine that...truth from a Clinton, but I believe her.

In Clinton-speak, she is saying that all of the official propaganda written is truly inaccurate, of course, because it is used to counter and cover up the actual truth that is written about her (the list is long), which is unimportant to her.

Convenient, since she "can't recall" it anyway, which has been the case since long before her many recent falls and head injuries.

19 posted on 07/02/2014 9:09:59 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Does she miss old Webb ?


20 posted on 07/02/2014 9:13:41 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson