To: US Navy Vet
They could save a bundle by going back to the 1911.
2 posted on
07/03/2014 7:52:14 AM PDT by
DBrow
To: DBrow
3 posted on
07/03/2014 7:53:02 AM PDT by
US Navy Vet
(Go Packers! Go Rockies! Go Boston Bruins! See, I'm "Diverse"!)
To: DBrow
Typical GI can’t shoot the 45 cal hardball accurately. The Army should consider going to revolvers.
12 posted on
07/03/2014 7:56:03 AM PDT by
csmusaret
(Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
To: DBrow
They should, but they won’t, because they want to have metric ammo due to nato.
30 posted on
07/03/2014 8:06:38 AM PDT by
dila813
To: DBrow
Yup. Simple and reliable.
They want a more accurate pistol? The pistol is very accurate, even the cheap ones. The person using it is is the one who missed..
71 posted on
07/03/2014 8:36:02 AM PDT by
glyptol
To: DBrow
Right on. There is no better pistol for combat, IMHO.
Maybe a beefed-up version and a new hotter .45 ACP round.
Hard to believe anyone could on all-around strengths of the 1911.....
How about the Sig Sauer STX 1911? Or Wilson Combat?
104 posted on
07/03/2014 9:02:52 AM PDT by
Arlis
To: DBrow
THAT SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN REPLACED BY A 9MM TO START WITH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
119 posted on
07/03/2014 9:51:51 AM PDT by
mabarker1
(Please, Somebody Impeach the kenyan!!!! Once again dingy hairball, STFU!!! You corrupt POS!!!)
To: DBrow
they don’t b/c women can’t hold the gun well and don’t like the rounds’ intensity.
that’s why the 40 cal’s exist today.
165 posted on
07/03/2014 12:39:47 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: DBrow
The 1911 is the perfect weapon.....if you ever run out of ammo, you can beat the enemy to death with it.
209 posted on
07/05/2014 4:55:00 PM PDT by
Red in Blue PA
(When Injustice becomes Law, Resistance Becomes Duty.-Thomas Jefferson)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson