Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The New King George: America is one lawyer away from losing her right to practice religion
American Thinker ^ | 07/03/2014 | Tom Trinko

Posted on 07/06/2014 6:55:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

We Americans are one lawyer away from losing our right to practice our religion.

One more liberal Supreme Court Justice would mean that liberal extremists would be able to use the full power of the government to force people of faith to offer sacrifices at the altars of the gods of liberalism -- abortion, contraception, gay marriage, etc.

Liberal Supreme Court judges have said that employers have no religious freedom. If an employee wants something, then the employer must provide it despite the employer’s religious beliefs. No woman needs contraceptives or to be sterilized. Those are not part of providing a “living wage” or even of providing necessary, as opposed to optional, healthcare.

If you want to go fishing you can’t expect your company to provide you with a boat. Instead, you take part of your salary and buy a boat. The same applies if you want a bigger TV or to go to a football game. But somehow, if someone wants to enjoy themselves by having sex, liberals believe that their employer has to provide them with contraceptives.

No one has died from being celibate; contraception is not necessary healthcare.

The coercive logic behind the liberal Justices' position becomes obvious when we realize that the same Justices have no problem with small companies not having to offer health insurance at all. How can it be unconstitutional for a large company to not provide free birth control when it’s constitutional for a small company to not provide insurance if you get cancer? Are we to believe that our rights are based on the size of the company we work for?

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: religion; scotus; supremecourt

1 posted on 07/06/2014 6:55:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

A certainly pitiful complement of what liberals would say is ‘diverse’. A lesbian, a hateful wretch of a woman poisoned by liberal venom, and a “Wise Latina” who believes her race/ethnic background makes her better than anyone not Hispanic.

Diverse means different; it does not mean better. Richness comes from individual constituents, not the bland filler that provides the medium.

To stubbornly enforce diversity without excellence is madness. That’s what got us the Tyrant Obama.


2 posted on 07/06/2014 7:00:58 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Are women not capable of sitting on the court and thinking with their head rather than vagina? These three nitwits purport to be scholars of the constitution. They’re more like cheap feminist professors.


3 posted on 07/06/2014 7:15:25 AM PDT by Viennacon (Rebuke the Repuke!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

RE: A lesbian, a hateful wretch of a woman poisoned by liberal venom

Has Elena Kagan actually come out?


4 posted on 07/06/2014 7:18:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bump


5 posted on 07/06/2014 7:19:18 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The way things are going in this culture, just wait a few years. We may find that indeed employers are required to provide you with that boat to go fishing. They may be required to provide you with the big screen TV.

I’m not sure if I’m being sarcastic or not........


6 posted on 07/06/2014 7:26:43 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

the women justices are all liberal. Their liberalism overrides everything else. It overrides any other factor of the law.


7 posted on 07/06/2014 7:27:38 AM PDT by Dilbert San Diego (s)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

They’d have put an old white guy in there just as easily. It’s liberal they’re looking for and there are plenty of them to fill that order.

It’s the shaky republicans whom they’re after. They’re the ones who would never vote against a wise Latina

When someone comes along with a. 47% statement they need to look at the truth and own it. It is the truth


8 posted on 07/06/2014 7:34:56 AM PDT by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: stanne

I agree with your sentiment, but they get far more mileage out of some select “diverse” group. You can’t argue the contrary.


9 posted on 07/06/2014 7:36:09 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson