[I want the USA back]

This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one, or lose millions of dollars.

[Quality_Not_Quantity]

And here’s another question...

How are we supposed to know if a particular candidate is homosexual in the first place?

[Pearls Before Swine]

This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one...

Preferential treatment is the liberal's idea of equality or non-bias.

[freedumb2003]

>>This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one, or lose millions of dollars.<<

It will be the latter. After the ADA we managers were given backdoor instructions to find ANY reason NOT to hire disabled, since upper management knew we would never get rid of them.

They hired a few token disabled but generally the ADA was the biggest anti-disabled piece of... legislation ever.

[dfwgator]

This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one, or lose millions of dollars.

See Michael Sam and the Rams......They'll never be able to cut him.

[jsanders2001]

> This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one, or lose millions of dollars.

Or hire them and they infect your customers and they sue you for $2 M. Take your pick or close your doors and do exactly what Obama designed the law to do in the first place.

[2nd Amendment]

While Rome burns, Zero is out catering to his 2.3% base and the 99% of dims that support and facilitate that base!

[Calamari]

This will mean that you have to hire all gays who apply, and will never be able to fire one, or lose millions of dollars.

If this becomes law it won't matter. Your whole work force is now gay. Don't believe me? Try to terminate some one and you will discover that they are gay. They've just been in the closet until now but you've forced their hand.

You prove they are not gay. How are you going to do that?