Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/27/2014 4:23:45 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: John W

Our country has gone stark raving mad.


2 posted on 08/27/2014 4:27:26 AM PDT by madprof98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

There’s no biological reason why Blacks and Whites can’t marry.

There is a biological reason why Gays can’t marry. They are the same sex. Marriage is between different sexes.


3 posted on 08/27/2014 4:28:04 AM PDT by agere_contra (Hamas has dug miles of tunnels - but no bomb-shelters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Gay marriage promotes disease. Do any lawyers come at it from that perspective? Anal sex is a health risk. Gay marriage should be outlawed on that alone.


4 posted on 08/27/2014 4:30:47 AM PDT by missnry (The truth will set you free ... and drive liberals crazy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Traditionally our federal judges have enjoyed life tenure.

So if tradition is no longer honored by our judges there should be an easy way to fire these morons.


5 posted on 08/27/2014 4:31:55 AM PDT by proudpapa (Scott Walker - 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Men ≠ Women

Man + Woman ≠ Man + Man
Man + Woman ≠ Woman + Woman

6 posted on 08/27/2014 4:33:46 AM PDT by RangerM
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Posner has gone off the deep end. Doesn’t he realize that any man can marry any woman? How is different from the Jim Crow democrat days? Any man could not marry any woman.

Where is the mystery in that difference? Marriage is a union between a man and a woman. Any man and any woman (certain exceptions apply).


7 posted on 08/27/2014 4:34:29 AM PDT by Captain Jack Aubrey (There's not a moment to lose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Same sex marriage: Undoing four million years of evolution with the stroke of a pen.


10 posted on 08/27/2014 4:39:41 AM PDT by reg45 (Barack 0bama: Implementing class warfare by having no class.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

5 years from now, when two married lesbian women want to enter into a triple marriage with their French poodle, this same judge will say, ‘Why not? Time was when two gays couldn’t marry, either.’


13 posted on 08/27/2014 4:43:26 AM PDT by ArtDodger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Marriage is soooooo 1960s, anyway, thanks to LBJ's "Great Society" programs.


16 posted on 08/27/2014 4:45:03 AM PDT by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
This is simple.
IMPEACH/FIRE the Homosexual Judge.
24 posted on 08/27/2014 4:55:21 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Because who are we to say this isn't right:


25 posted on 08/27/2014 4:59:09 AM PDT by SampleMan (Feral Humans are the refuse of socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

they should have argued the purpose of marriage is pro-creation. homo marriage cannot due this.


26 posted on 08/27/2014 5:03:21 AM PDT by ealgeone (obama, borderof)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

I hear that dementia is suggested when any man/ woman/ or ? cannot distinguish between skin color and Sexual Orientation— between “marriage” and fornication/ abomination. Posner is a Poser and NOT a Righteous Judge. No Judge divorced from the Laws dictated by God,Himself has any Just power to change the definition of “marriage” Jesus, that Rabbi from Nazareth called Christ directed the Pharisee who tempted Him back to the beginning (Genesis 1:27; and 2:24) It is significant that the precedents in the “Holy Writ “ do not suggest legal same sex relations— and the example of Sodom and Gomorrah for those who would afterward live unrighteous remains as valid today as when it was written in the beginning.


28 posted on 08/27/2014 5:10:41 AM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
Prohibition of same-sex marriage, Posner said, derives from "a tradition of hate ... and savage discrimination" of homosexuals.

Nothing like an impartial judge. Rather than tradition, maybe a better reason would be same sex marriages are "unnatural".
Unnatural as in not part of nature.

Natural law, or the law of nature , is a system of law that is determined by nature, and so is universal.[1] Classically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature — both social and personal — and deduce binding rules of moral behavior from it....Wikipedia

Natural law is a benchmark to measure how far man has deviated from the best model of survival available to us.

29 posted on 08/27/2014 5:10:46 AM PDT by oldbrowser (We have a rogue government in Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

“It was tradition to not allow blacks and whites to marry — a tradition that got swept away,” the 75-year-old judge said. Prohibition of same-sex marriage, Posner said, derives from “a tradition of hate ... and savage discrimination” of homosexuals.


Idiot judge buys the strawman.


30 posted on 08/27/2014 5:22:56 AM PDT by cuban leaf (The US will not survive the obama presidency. The world may not either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

CHICAGO (AP) — Federal appeals judges bristled on Tuesday at arguments defending gay marriage bans in Indiana and Wisconsin, with one Republican appointee comparing them to now-defunct laws that once outlawed weddings between blacks and whites.

Just because they are judges does not mean they are not idiots.


36 posted on 08/27/2014 5:30:09 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

Posner said, derives from “a tradition of hate ... and savage discrimination” of homosexuals.

Wow this man just called God a Hater..........


37 posted on 08/27/2014 5:30:59 AM PDT by SECURE AMERICA (I am an American. Not a Republican or a Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

besides this is a common law nation


42 posted on 08/27/2014 5:46:57 AM PDT by yldstrk ( My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W
When I look at US, I better understand why Eve picked an apple. We definitely got it from that side of the family. Just look at US now!

Not sure which we lost first, but we've managed to lose both our way and our integrity.

The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.
~Aristotle

43 posted on 08/27/2014 6:07:25 AM PDT by GBA (Here in the Matrix, life is but a dream.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: John W

The word “Ban” doesn’t even apply in these cases. In all of these cases, there is no one preventing any of these homosexual couples from having a ceremony, living together, or otherwise living as though they were “married.” Their living arrangement is simply not legally defined as a marriage. To ban something is to prevent it or to have penalties in the law (fines, jail time, etc.) for violating the ban - there are no penalties levied against homosexuals who choose to have a living arrangement similar to a marriage while living in a state that does not recognize such arrangements as marriage.


45 posted on 08/27/2014 7:19:33 AM PDT by Army Air Corps (Four Fried Chickens and a Coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson