“This threat cannot be solved simply by dealing with the perceived grievances over Western foreign policy”
Those who are using this reason really don’t understand ISIS at all. Most of who they kill are Muslims, so how could they hold US/West accountable for killing Muslims when they do it themselves. Its got nothing to do with revenge/perceived injustice, but simply a movement to create an Islamic Empire and forcing everyone to convert. This is not local, regional, but a global movement
or gone golfing.
Contrast that with Obama’s “we don’t have a strategy for dealing with ISIS”.
Sheeesh, it’s embarrassing!
Obama doesn’t have an ISIS strategy because ‘strategy’ has too many Ts in it that remind him of the afternoon T-time.
I actually rewound and replayed David Camerons speech, because I missed hearing from a REAL leader for so long, that it was good to finally hear one.
************
Belatedly. He waited until he was forced to do something. That is not real leadership, but at least he is doing something. Obama not so much.
Obama has a plan It’s outlined here: The Communist Manifest by Karl Marx.
Another obama legacy - Europe, of all places, shows him up.
Relax, kick back, and enjoy the weekend and bbq.
Obama and his minions strategize day and night. They do just about nothing except strategize. But the only thing they strategize about is how to destroy the Republican party and steal elections. It’s too bad they’re getting a lot of help doing that from inside the republican party itself.
They have no time left to worry about the ME or Russian imperialism.
Weak, wimpy baby-faced Cameron has a strategy. Weak, wimpy, jug-eared incompetent has no strategy.