Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sotomayor: Americans Should be Alarmed by Spread of Drones
WSJ ^ | 9/12/2014 | Jacob Gershman

Posted on 09/12/2014 12:30:24 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan

Americans should be more concerned about their privacy being invaded by the spread of drones, Justice Sonia Sotomayor told an Oklahoma City audience on Thursday.

Speaking before a group of faculty members and students at Oklahoma City University’s law school on Sept. 11, Justice Sotomayor said “frightening” changes in surveillance technology should encourage citizens to take a more active role in the privacy debate. She said she’s particularly troubled by the potential for commercial and government drones to compromise personal privacy.

Said Justice Sotomayor:

There are drones flying over the air randomly that are recording everything that’s happening on what we consider our private property. That type of technology has to stimulate us to think about what is it that we cherish in privacy and how far we want to protect it and from whom. Because people think that it should be protected just against government intrusion, but I don’t like the fact that someone I don’t know…can pick up, if they’re a private citizen, one of these drones and fly it over my property.

Technological advances make it possible for devices to “listen to your conversations from miles away and through your walls,” Justice Sotomayor said. “We are in that brave new world, and we are capable of being in that Orwellian world, too.”

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: drones; privacy; rchelicopters; scotus; sotomayor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

1 posted on 09/12/2014 12:30:24 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Lurking Libertarian; Perdogg; JDW11235; Clairity; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregNH; Salvation; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

2 posted on 09/12/2014 12:30:58 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (There are those that break and bend. I'm the other kind. ~Steve Earle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Do a little nude sunbathing in the back yard there, Sonia baby?


3 posted on 09/12/2014 12:31:52 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

OK. I’m alarmed. Now what?


4 posted on 09/12/2014 12:32:06 PM PDT by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

More alarmed about the spread of Sotomayor.


5 posted on 09/12/2014 12:32:44 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk (2014-2016. Whether The Republic lives or dies depends on the now-missing integrity of the the GOP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

She’s just concerned that someday someone with a drone with a parabolic antenna is going to capture a conversation of her colluding with the Holder DOJ and Dem Congressional leaders on how to rule on cases before the Court.


6 posted on 09/12/2014 12:33:32 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Yeah! Whatever happened to good old fashioned Cruise Missiles like Clinton used?


7 posted on 09/12/2014 12:34:42 PM PDT by csmusaret (Will remove Obama-Biden bumperstickers for $10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

We’re more alarmed by the invasion of diseased illegal, Sotomeyor.


8 posted on 09/12/2014 12:35:15 PM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Drones should be outlawed period. Citizens should be allowed to shoot them down (OK, maybe not).

The government should be restricted from using them over U.S. soil without a warrant.


9 posted on 09/12/2014 12:36:41 PM PDT by Maceman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Is a ‘spread’ of drones anything like a spread of duck decoys?


10 posted on 09/12/2014 12:36:42 PM PDT by Scrambler Bob (/s /s /s /s /s, my replies are "liberally" sprinkled with them behind every word and letter.!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Is she saying we should worry about the drones that fly, or the drones who vote Democrat?


11 posted on 09/12/2014 12:37:36 PM PDT by chrisser (When do we get to tell the Middle East to stop clinging to their guns and religion?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I am. Two more drones on the SCOTUS bench and this country is toast!


12 posted on 09/12/2014 12:38:05 PM PDT by TigersEye ("No man left behind" means something different to 0bama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I was more concerned about the spread of wise Latinas into the Supreme Court.


13 posted on 09/12/2014 12:38:29 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

right now worried more about the spread of illegals, sonya baby.


14 posted on 09/12/2014 12:40:40 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Ho, ho, ho. Sotomayor is so stupid. What we need is more drones, and more surveillance! Full-scale monitoring, 24/7. If she’s worried about it, it must be good!


15 posted on 09/12/2014 12:44:20 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Perhaps so...but at *this* moment I'm more concerned with the spread of 30 million illegals...at least a few of whom very probably entered via Mexico but don't speak a word of Spanish.

If ya catch my drift

16 posted on 09/12/2014 12:44:30 PM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Islamopobia:The Irrational Fear Of Being Beheaded)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I am less concerned about a private citizen (who has limited funds and is personally responsible for any illegal activities) than I am about a government agent (who has virtually unlimited funds and will not suffer any legal repercussions for their actions).

Lets start with restricting what the government can observe/record and what they can do with the data that they collect.


17 posted on 09/12/2014 12:45:45 PM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

wow i agree with this intellectual light weight on something. must explain the snow here today.


18 posted on 09/12/2014 12:45:49 PM PDT by bravo whiskey (we shouldn't fear the government. the government should fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

I am more alarmed with left wing judicial activists.


19 posted on 09/12/2014 12:47:01 PM PDT by lormand (Inside every liberal is a dung slinging monkey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Cameras and satellite tracking planned for fishermen:

“Electronic Technologies is an umbrella term for:
• Electronic Monitoring – video cameras & associated equipment to record
video & fishing effort data, and vessel monitoring systems”

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/sfa/hms/advisory_panels/hms_ap/meetings/sept_2014/documents/thurs/electronic_technologies_in_hms_fisheries_-_fall_2014_ap_meeting.pdf


20 posted on 09/12/2014 12:47:47 PM PDT by Captain7seas (Beware of "enviromentalist" spewing lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson