Skip to comments.
Gabby Giffords: Gun Control for Women's Sake Now
breitbart.com ^
| 9/13/2014
| AWR Hawkins
Posted on 09/14/2014 8:17:16 AM PDT by rktman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Yup. More range time for women would help with their gun control. More center of mass hits.
As an aside, in this todays reno gazette journal the following appeared with regards to the background check initiative the nannies are pushing here in NV.
http://www.rgj.com/story/news/2014/09/13/fact-checker-gun-background-check-claims-true/15153955/
I actually was surprised for the most part that the "fact checker" found the nannies to be liars. The one glaring mis-step is the reference to gun shows yet again and the intimation that there aren't any checks done there. Other than that, not bad for the "fact checker" this time.
1
posted on
09/14/2014 8:17:16 AM PDT
by
rktman
To: rktman
2
posted on
09/14/2014 8:17:48 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
To: rktman
Did she write it all or was it ghost written and given her name to boost the profile?
3
posted on
09/14/2014 8:18:53 AM PDT
by
a fool in paradise
(Hey Obama: If Islamic State is not Islamic, then why did you give Osama Bin Laden a muslim funeral?)
To: rktman
Without the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, you have no other rights; your only have things they allow you to do.
4
posted on
09/14/2014 8:19:42 AM PDT
by
BuffaloJack
(Bomb ISIS; bomb them again; bomb them again; kill all survivors; take no prisoners.)
To: rktman
A good reason to reject her appointed successor Ron Barber with a real American, Martha McSally Lt. Col. USAF Ret.
5
posted on
09/14/2014 8:20:22 AM PDT
by
Don Corleone
("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
To: rktman
Wait a minute, I thought we were all equals and were to treat all people equally. IF this is true, why laws to supposedly protect women. Furthermore, if women can fight in combat, as defense officials suggest, they certainly should be able to defend themselves without anyone’s assistance.
6
posted on
09/14/2014 8:23:23 AM PDT
by
rey
To: rktman
No, I think I’ll keep my right to bear arms, you stupid, useless, dangerous woman.
7
posted on
09/14/2014 8:23:23 AM PDT
by
chris37
(heartless)
To: rktman
8
posted on
09/14/2014 8:26:44 AM PDT
by
mylife
To: rktman
Women shouldn’t be drinking sake and handling firearms.
To: rktman
My wife is getting more and more into gun control.
The Sig, the Kahr, the Shield, the Airweight. Yep, she’s got them all under control.
10
posted on
09/14/2014 8:31:00 AM PDT
by
ChildOfThe60s
((If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there)
To: a fool in paradise
mx. mark kelley-giffords more than likely penned it since I’m not sure she can put it together. Odd how the lib/prog/socialist/dhimmikkkrat anti’s use brain damaged folks to try to get there point across.
11
posted on
09/14/2014 8:31:24 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
To: ChildOfThe60s
12
posted on
09/14/2014 8:32:41 AM PDT
by
rktman
(Ethnicity: Nascarian. Race: Daytonafivehundrian)
To: BuffaloJack
Without the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, you have no other rights; your only have things they allow you to do. Yes. My long-ago tagline:
Without the Second, the rest are just politician's promises.
13
posted on
09/14/2014 8:34:50 AM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Thank you for self-censoring.)
To: rktman
14
posted on
09/14/2014 8:37:23 AM PDT
by
tomkat
To: rktman
Make more women victims, got it Gabby!
15
posted on
09/14/2014 8:39:28 AM PDT
by
gortklattu
(God knows who is best, everybody else is making guesses - Tony Snow)
To: rey
Wait a minute, I thought we were all equals and were to treat all people equally. IF this is true, why laws to supposedly protect women. Furthermore, if women can fight in combat, as defense officials suggest, they certainly should be able to defend themselves without anyones assistance. All laws that give special status to any group should be ruled unconstitutional. Women, gays, minorities, etc. should not have special "privileges". I can see an exception for severely handicapped people in necessary instances.
16
posted on
09/14/2014 8:39:35 AM PDT
by
oldbrowser
(We have a rogue government in Washington)
To: rktman
Yup. More range time for women would help with their gun control. More center of mass hits. Amen!
17
posted on
09/14/2014 8:40:48 AM PDT
by
depressed in 06
(America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
To: rktman
More gun control for women’s sake, because women naturally have the upper hand in any physical struggle with a male attacker so if there are no guns involved the woman has a much better chance of defending herself against rape.
Got it.
To: rktman
I want to ask her one question. Why is it alright no matter what gender you are for her or certain others to be protected by guns and not us?
19
posted on
09/14/2014 8:46:05 AM PDT
by
freekitty
(Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
To: a fool in paradise
Did she write it all or was it ghost written and given her name to boost the profile?
Did she write any of it?
20
posted on
09/14/2014 8:49:06 AM PDT
by
Shannon
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-76 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson