Posted on 10/23/2014 9:37:37 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
RE: Yeah, well when Jesus confronted the woman caught in adultery and challenged the crowd by saying “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone,” nobody threw any stones.
If you were there would you have cast a stone? Are you without sin?
______________________
I would NOT cast the first stone ( I don’t believe in stoning ).
But calling what is sin, sin is not casting stones. It is TELLING THE TRUTH.
People cannot repent of their sins unless they recognize that they have sinned. And you don’t do them any favors by not calling it out.
Ping.
These snowmobile parties sound off the hook!
I am quite certain that Bristol Palin recognizes her sin. She has to view the effects of that sin every day, and I am certain that while she regrets the sin, she has no regrets about raising and loving her son with all her heart.
Since you feel obligated to publicly throw spiritual stones at Bristol Palin for her shortcomings, I think it is fitting to call you out publicly for your sin. HYPOCTRITE!
And the single mother of a 5 year old, drunk off her ass at a party. Yeah, she’s quite the role model I keep hearing about.
Uhh... because she hasn’t run for President? That would be my guess.
Brilliant.
You are an idiot. When giving a statement to the police, or testifying in court you are REQUIRED to repeat verbatim (as closely as memory allows) any conversation you recount.
Have you ever heard the expression “Truth, whole truth, and nothing but the truth”?
Interesting that the audio with that article does not include the quote you posted, only the reporter’s quote of what she said. I would have thought they would include that bit of audio, being more damaging to Bristol because she isn’t quoting some foul-mouthed pervert.
All that to say...my bs detector is on high alert.
Bristol’s choice of boyfriend, getting pregnant - those are embarrassments. What her low-life ex does after they split is no shame on her.
Thank goodness I’m not held accountable for a former girlfriend of mine who, last I heard, was a homeless tweaker, having abandoned her husband and 4 children. I feel sorry for her husband and grateful for my good fortune to not have suffered such a tragic turn of events; but I’m not embarrassed because of her actions (and neither is my mom).
Yes, there is. She was giving a statement to police. If she is quoting someone, she needs to quote them as precisely as she is able.
If you think the pictures depict what she was wearing you probably should find a different forum- this one being far too intellectual.
There is no such thing as a “thong dress” as far as I can find.
In grammar school, I was not taught to rush to google, but to look at the context when I came across a word I don’t understand.
Word(s) you don’t understand: thong dress
Context:
She was wearing a dress (she stated this before any mention of thong)
She was pushed to the ground
She was being dragged by her feet
Does the context give you any clues as to what she was meaning when using the words “thong” and “dress”, and why she was upset about it?
Her words: “ A guy comes out of nowhere and pushes me on the ground, takes me by my feet in my dress — in my thong dress in front of ...”
so - which was it? Was it a dress? Or was it your imaginary “thong dress”? Probably it was Bigfoot dragging her around in her “thong dress”, ya think????
So....you quote her, now what do you surmise a “thong dress” is?? Do you want to just make it up?
Now - you failed your first quiz...take some time, think about it REEEEAAAAALLL hard...what do you think she was trying to say in her agitated state? Was she trying to inform the officer of a new fashion trend? Think! Oh, never mind, don’t blow a brain-gasket! Guess you’ll just remain ignorant!
BUT! Don’t let your ignorance slow down your condemnation of Bristol for wearing something that doesn’t exist and you have no earthly idea what it is....but since a picture popped up on google, oh! gasp! horror! she must have been dressed like a hooooor!!!
Thong dress are her words . Not mine
Am I to surmise from your vapid reply that you believe your words are always perfect in form and structure when speaking during extreme agitation?
No, not your words, but you hang onto them so tightly as if you wish they were.
Use the brain God gave you for the purpose it was given.
>> Wolf Blitzer broke into CNN’s live coverage to play newly-released audio of Bristol Palin
Now, that’s something to be proud of... what a dick.
I was just pointing out that they were her words, not my imagination as you were seemingly suggesting.
You imagined what a “thong dress” must be, drew conclusions from your silly imaginings, used Google poorly, and condemned someone based on your poor search skills.
You were unable to recognize that the awkward order of the words was evidence of her agitation; not a specific statement about wearing a “thong dress” but an attempt to express her humiliation that while being dragged by her heels in a dress, her thong would be visible to everyone...because she was wearing a thong under her dress (you have made it clear that subtly is lost on you).
Now aren’t you glad I took you by the hand and guided you explicitely through that simple little exercise? Most adults and many children are able to work that out on their own - especially with the very broad hints I was handing you. It take a certain type of person to continue to blunder ahead without an “oops! I guess I missed that”.
You are not motivated by the search for truth in this, but rather your hatred of Bristol and probably the rest of the Palins.
It is ok for you to dislike someone, what is not ok is to make up something like a “thong dress” (Bristol stumbled with her words, you seized upon the stumble to invent something out of your hate-addled mind) to justify your hate. Such a stretch leads me to believe your hatred is irrational.
What kind of a person wears a thong?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.