Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Brilliant response to a gotcha question by hostile media. They wanted Cruz to attack CEO of one of the most popular companies with young people, thus spinning that he is a bigot, or a theocrat, or a behind the times old man. His response is clear, articulate, intelligent, and conservative. He brings it back to issues that people actually care about including people who are moderate, young, and pro gay; Constitutional limitations on concentrations of power, local autonomy by limiting the federal government, democracy vs judicial oligarchy. He comes off reasonable and intelligent, and avoids the trap of preaching in a political forum.

This man will be a great President. Not just for Freepers or conservatives or Christians; the whole country will benefit from having such a mature and reasoned man at its helm.

Ted Cruz 2016!!!

1 posted on 10/30/2014 12:23:28 PM PDT by BurningOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
To: BurningOak

Who the hell cares what a CEO does in his spare time!


2 posted on 10/30/2014 12:24:38 PM PDT by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak
Cruz is definitely smart enough to succeed in 2016.

But will the media allow people to hear what he has to say? They will not.

He's gonna need to get creative to get his message across.

3 posted on 10/30/2014 12:25:33 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

For most people, Tim Cook remains a faceless executive, even after (over)sharing his lifestyle data with us. We don’t care about that. Just don’t go all Facebook-ish and start selling our private info to the government’s highest bidder.


4 posted on 10/30/2014 12:29:10 PM PDT by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

It is a personal choice so, why not keep that choice of

behavior to himself? Oh, he supports homosexual marriage.


5 posted on 10/30/2014 12:29:40 PM PDT by Christie at the beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Question #2 (heard in a Senate race this month): “Would you be comfortable going to a Gay wedding?” It’s going to be asked, ...


6 posted on 10/30/2014 12:32:17 PM PDT by 11th_VA (It may be legal, but it's still wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

I’m going to bet that Cruz gets raked over the coals for his suggestion that ‘it’s his decision’ as opposed to some statement that would suggest that he agrees that this is just simply a part of ‘who Timmy is’....


8 posted on 10/30/2014 12:34:18 PM PDT by hecticskeptic (In life it's important to know what you believeÂ….but more more importantly, why you believe it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Cruz and his supporters think they can bob and weave and triangulate and thread the needle and figure the odds.

I have news for them. God will not be mocked. Those who deny Christ will be denied by him before his Father.


9 posted on 10/30/2014 12:34:53 PM PDT by Romulus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

The title is a blatant twisting of what Cruz said.


12 posted on 10/30/2014 12:35:34 PM PDT by Moonman62 (The US has become a government with a country, rather than a country with a government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak; Kale; Jarhead9297; COUNTrecount; notaliberal; DoughtyOne; RitaOK; MountainDad; ...
Ted Cruz Ping!

If you want on/off this ping list, please let me know.

Please beware, this is a high-volume ping list!
13 posted on 10/30/2014 12:35:50 PM PDT by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Come to think of it . . my iphone has been acting gay, lately!


14 posted on 10/30/2014 12:36:28 PM PDT by 2nd Amendment (Proud member of the 48% . . giver not a taker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak
"He brings it back to issues that people actually care about"

So the homosexual agenda isn't an issue that "BurningOak" actually cares about? "Burning" is apt for you or will be.

23 posted on 10/30/2014 12:44:06 PM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Cruz is right


24 posted on 10/30/2014 12:44:50 PM PDT by wardaddy (todays republicans are worse than reconstruction era.....and that takes effort)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Cruz is da man of the moment


26 posted on 10/30/2014 12:47:41 PM PDT by GeronL (Vote for Conservatives not for Republicans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

“Brilliant response to a gotcha question by hostile media.”

Not really, because marriage has legal implications and people move around to much. The Feds need to refuse to acknowledge queer marriage in any form.

If left to the states the courts will ram it down our throats. No way will they settle for queers being married in one state, and not in another.


27 posted on 10/30/2014 12:47:50 PM PDT by Beagle8U (If illegal aliens are undocumented immigrants, then shoplifters are undocumented customers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Homosexuality is a sick perversion. Even Cruz is cowed. Our leaders are gutless.


32 posted on 10/30/2014 12:49:14 PM PDT by stinkerpot65 (Global warming is a Marxist lie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak
If we run another candidate like a Bob Dole or a John McCain or a Mitt Romney, we will end up with the same result, which is millions of people will stay home on Election Day, Cruz then said.

He added that they were all good, honorable men.

I like Cruz. I just wish he would have left that out. We talk about them not being who we should have running, and then confuse things by saying they're good honorable men. If they are good honorable men, why shouldn't they run?

This confuses the general public. It's a mistake to characterize them in this manner. Just refuse to categorize them once you've said they shouldn't run, unless you want to reinforce why.

38 posted on 10/30/2014 12:53:25 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Dunam, Duncan, man what infections these folks brought over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

Who cares about his sexual habits


39 posted on 10/30/2014 12:53:47 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

DO I pee standing up or sitting down? Would anyone like to know?/s


45 posted on 10/30/2014 12:56:45 PM PDT by Dallas59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

I’m so very glad the MSM is doing important work like trying to destroy conservative candidates and not focusing on trivial stories like the Federal Government planting evidence on investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson’s computer.


75 posted on 10/30/2014 1:10:44 PM PDT by Flick Lives ("I can't believe it's not Fascism!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BurningOak

The Federal Government cannot micromanage the lives of 300 million people, and should not try. Cruz is correct.


77 posted on 10/30/2014 1:13:56 PM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson