Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This Is What a Feminist Looks Like
FrontPage Magazine ^ | November 4, 2014 | Daniel Greenfield

Posted on 11/04/2014 4:52:53 AM PST by SJackson

In Nigeria and Iraq, Muslim armies are selling women as slaves. Iran hanged a woman for fighting off a rapist. ISIS was more direct about it and beheaded a woman who resisted one of its fighters.

But we don’t have to travel to the Middle East to see real horrors. The sex grooming scandal in the UK involved the rape of thousands of girls. The rapists were Muslim men so instead of talking about it, the UK’s feminists bought $75 shirts reading, “This is what a feminist looks like” which were actually being made by Third World women living sixteen to a room.

This was what a feminist looked like and it wasn’t a pretty picture.

The same willful unseriousness saw Ayaan Hirsi Ali, a survivor of genital mutilation and an informed critic of Muslim misogyny, booted from Brandeis by self-proclaimed feminists. Meanwhile the major feminist cause at the moment is Gamergate, a controversy over video games which can be traced back to a female game developer who slept with a video game reviewer.

Professional feminists have spent more time and energy denouncing video games than the sale and rape of girls in Nigeria and Iraq.

That is what feminism looks like and there is something seriously wrong with that.

Women Against Feminism touched a nerve because professional feminists know that few women want to identify as feminists. Polls have found that the majority of women view feminism negatively. Even among young women, the feminist label doesn’t come close to breaking the halfway mark.

Professional feminists respond to the negative feedback by claiming that feminism is simply equality. But if feminism were equality, women, and for that matter men, wouldn’t dislike it so much.

A feminist looks like a professional activist wearing a $75 t-shirt made by slave labor while proclaiming that she is a feminist. It isn’t fighting for the rights of women that makes her a feminist. It’s the pricey fashion statement of someone who toots their own horn while exploiting less fortunate women.

The professional feminist is not there to help women, but to promote the agenda of the institutional left. She will turn campus rape into a political cause while criticizing every rape prevention measure, from a rape drug detecting nail polish to self-defense for women, for not dealing with rape culture. Stopping rape doesn’t interest her. Exploiting the abuse of women to fight a culture war does.

Her concerns are limited to causes affecting upper class young women and the overall political organizational needs of the left. That’s why she will veer erratically from inflating college rape statistics to arguing for illegal alien amnesty despite the high number of rapes committed by migrants.

But the women being raped generally won’t be found on an Ivy League campus.

And that’s also what a feminist looks like.

The institutional left can’t call out Islam for sexism, homophobia and racism because it has already inducted it into its political coalition. And that’s why feminists can’t talk about the mass rape of young girls in the UK without stepping on a political landmine. Those courageous women who do talk about it, like Ayaan Hirsi Ali or Pamela Geller, represent the principles that feminists only claim to stand for.

It’s easy to take shots at gamers, but discussing the rise of honor killings, genital mutilation and domestic abuse among Muslims migrating to the West is dangerous territory. That is why Ayaan Hirsi Ali had to be silenced so that she wouldn’t show up the professional feminists trying to pretend that their mass distractions of video games, subsidized birth control or celebrating “sex workers” are real feminism.

Modern feminism is defined by talking non-stop about the things that don’t matter to avoid talking about the things that do. It long ago stopped being a movement and became a series of distractions. When feminists actually hit on a relevant issue they quickly scramble to avoid talking about it. That’s what happened with the viral Hollaback video of a woman walking around New York City and being harassed by minority men. The video quickly went from a hit to an embarrassment as feminists realized that they had unintentionally documented something that they could not talk about.

Feminism is filled with things that it can’t talk about. That’s why it long ago hit a dead end. It is too afraid of being politically incorrect to be relevant. It can’t advocate for women and so it frantically stirs up micro-controversies that are irrelevant to 99.99% of women. Its obsession with Gamergate as the biggest threat to women since the time that Miss USA suggested that women should take self-defense classes is another reminder of its inability to meaningfully address the problems facing women today.

Professional feminists don’t want to fight rape; they want to fight an intangible “rape culture”. They don’t want to help women. Instead they want to exploit the problems facing women to advance their own agendas and careers. They are part of a movement cut off from ordinary people and rooted in academia. Few women want to identify as feminists, because feminism doesn’t identify with them.

Feminism can’t talk about the problems facing women because it is a prisoner of the left. It’s a fundraising gimmick, an election turnout gimmick and a way to sell pricey shirts.

The War on Women meme has jumped the shark. Senator Mark Udall was mocked, ridiculed and written off by his own Democrats for his cynical abuse of the meme. An attempt by a congressional candidate to invoke it during a debate in New York was met with uproarious laughter.

The last election cycle had reduced feminism to subsidized birth control. This cycle wiped it off the map entirely. The next election cycle will bring us Hillary Clinton as the ultimate feminist candidate. Hillary built her career and won elections on the strength of her husband’s name. Polls show that she appeals to voters because they think her husband is part of the package deal.

If Hillary wins, the first female president will be a woman who got the job only because she refused to divorce her husband after he cheated on her because she hoped to exploit his political connections.

That too is what a feminist looks like.

Hillary Clinton laughing at her client’s rape of a 12-year-old girl from a working class family or Carol Costello chuckling over the assault on Bristol Palin reminds ordinary women what feminists really think of them.

Feminism no longer speaks to women. It has become a privileged sorority for actresses, politicians, media types and academics who don’t actually like women. Especially working class women.

The public face of feminism should be Ayaan Hirsi Ali, but instead it’s the neurotic privileged pettiness of Lena Dunham. Feminism has become a lightweight movement heavy on pop culture and phony outrage and unbelievably light on content. It speaks all the time, but it no longer has anything to say.


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections; War on Terror
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2014 4:52:53 AM PST by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Gruesome stories of mass rape and slavery by ISIS and Boko Haram.


2 posted on 11/04/2014 4:59:43 AM PST by Impy (Voting democrat out of spite? Then you are America's enemy, like every other rat voter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

and the left wants muslim abuse here


3 posted on 11/04/2014 5:02:51 AM PST by SisterK (we are being set up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
The sex grooming scandal in the UK involved the rape of thousands of girls. The rapists were Muslim men so instead of talking about it, the UK’s feminists bought $75 shirts reading, “This is what a feminist looks like” which were actually being made by Third World women living sixteen...

"Feminist" is just an abbreviation for sanctimonious, social preening harpie. So the shirts are accurate. Irony is known to backfire.

4 posted on 11/04/2014 5:04:02 AM PST by Paine in the Neck (Socialism consumes EVERYTHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Another fine piece by Greenfield.

Modern feminism is defined by talking non-stop about the things that don’t matter to avoid talking about the things that do. It long ago stopped being a movement and became a series of distractions. When feminists actually hit on a relevant issue they quickly scramble to avoid talking about it.

Modern feminism is just another facet of modern liberalism.
5 posted on 11/04/2014 5:06:12 AM PST by ComputerGuy (BS, MS, PhD and a BMF besides)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
 photo feminist30wc.gif
6 posted on 11/04/2014 5:06:31 AM PST by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

and the left wants muslim abuse here

-+-—

No group in the world commits more violence against women, rapes more children, and commits more terrorism than muslims. It’s the 800 lb gorilla in the room. The left expects us to look the other way.


7 posted on 11/04/2014 5:10:21 AM PST by boycott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

8 posted on 11/04/2014 5:22:50 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SisterK

.....And look for more Americans to excerise their “2nd Amendment” rights.


9 posted on 11/04/2014 5:26:05 AM PST by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

“The public face of feminism” should be Pamela Geller, who takes on the Islamofacists via her website.


10 posted on 11/04/2014 5:27:31 AM PST by Biggirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Many Feminists are actually Left Wing Progressive revolutionaries who are fighting the system from within.

As such they find common cause with other revolutionaries with similar goals of destroying the system and sticking it to The Man.

Feminist values are simply a pre text and means to an end to further the revolution because, as always - The Issues are not the issue, The Revolution is the issue.

It's also probable that if one cared to take a close look, they would find that the people funding the Isamics are the same ones funding these feminists

But the tampon protest ear rings will look so marvelous dangling from their earlobes and blowing in the wind from their severed heads on fence posts

11 posted on 11/04/2014 5:38:19 AM PST by rdcbn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

This guy is a freakin alien. Man oh man. He and Valerie Jarrett.

Kinda like that old mini-series...V.

Peal off the flesh and reveal a damn alien lizard. urrrp urrrp skreeeech urrp


12 posted on 11/04/2014 5:40:25 AM PST by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Professional feminism is just another leftist movement. It is not about womens’ rights. It’s about beating down men as the ‘oppressors.’


13 posted on 11/04/2014 5:47:42 AM PST by I want the USA back (Media: completely irresponsible. Complicit in the destruction of this country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Feminism is a club of hairy-armpit liberal women who complain that they can’t get their employers pay for their contraceptives and abortions.


14 posted on 11/04/2014 5:49:46 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The cure has become worse than the disease. Support an end to the WOD now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Because Western “feminism” is simply a cover for anti-Christian bigotry.


15 posted on 11/04/2014 5:51:27 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
What kind of "saur" would you call a cross between Carville and Jarett?


16 posted on 11/04/2014 5:54:20 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ComputerGuy
Another fine piece by Greenfield.

Agreed. He and Camille Parliament should write a piece together.

17 posted on 11/04/2014 6:34:06 AM PST by To Hell With Poverty (Ephesians 6:12 becomes more real to me with each news cycle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SJackson

Google “Bella Abzug”. And then shield your eyes.


18 posted on 11/04/2014 6:40:14 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

A cankersaur.


19 posted on 11/04/2014 6:56:43 AM PST by Steely Tom (Thank you for self-censoring.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Ashley Judd


20 posted on 11/04/2014 6:58:20 AM PST by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson