Can Democrats Win Without Nominating Another Black Presidential Candidate? (VANITY)

[TigerClaws]

Without massive black turnout I don't see Democrats having a chance. Hillary can't motivate the base.

Is Cory Booker the 2016 Obama? Black U.S. Senator with virtually no experience that'll pass up the Billary machine?

[inpajamas]

Democrat voters don’t care who gives them other people’s money. So yes.

[Farmer Dean]

I think that this country is done with black presidential candidates.If it survives the present one,that is.

[Uncle Miltie]

I think Dr. Ben Carson would make an excellent V.P. :-)

[ari-freedom]

Obama was the historic first black so they’ll either go for the historic first hispanic and/or woman

[nascarnation]

It’s possible.

I think the Axlegrease/Plouffy/Podesta bunch call the shots.

Born in DC, Stanford, Rhodes Scholar, Yale Law.

He certainly has bonafides the MSM would drool over.

[dforest]

I think they will keep with the fat bloated Marxist woman...but you can bet they have a Latino or Hispanic Marxist waiting in the wings.

Black folks are going to be dumped and many have caught on.

[Farmer Dean]

I like him too,but I think the country will be too gunshy to elect him.The Obama experience has poisoned the well.

[Kartographer]

"Can Democrats Win Without Nominating Another Black Presidential Candidate?"

Who was the first one?

[Din Maker]

It would be political suicide for either Party to nominate a Black man (or woman). After Obama, trust me, America is NOT ready for another Black President. You can take that to the bank.

[taxcontrol]

The Clinton machine was caught looking the wrong way in the 2008 election. Obama was able to surprise them and ultimately, a deal was cut for her to join the administration in order to remain relevant and preserve some cred.

However, no surprises will be allowed for 2016. Arms will be twisted, party machines will be worked, donors will be locked in ... all very early. No one of any serious challenges will be allowed to stand against her in the primaries.

Mark my words.

[Yaelle]

I really don’t think race is important. Smart black voters are done with skin color only as determinant. Obama did nothing good for anyone in the end anyway. We need to worry about another Alinsky socialist with Another Historic First.

[riverdawg]

I suspect that many “independent”, apolitical women would vote for Hillary simply because she is a woman, just as many apolitical blacks voted for Obama simply because he is African-American.

[tcrlaf]

“Can Democrats win without a Black Candidate?”

That depends on what the TV and The Daily show tell the low-info’s.

There are already TWO “Hillary Can Be President!” shows running on TV, right now.

[babble-on]

I have been wondering the same thing. Without the black voters the Dems cannot win, and they now will expect a black candidate.

[chajin]

Fearless prediction, doomed to fail :-) if Hillary! is the nominee, Juan Castro will be her running mate; if Warren is the nominee, Booker will be her running mate. Warren will go for the female and black vote and try to get the Hispanics to tag along, while Hillary! will go for the female and Hispanic vote and try to get the blacks to tag along.

[ßuddaßudd]

Another Black ?
ummm,,, Øbama is half black and only half American...

[DAC21]

Probably not, but there going to give a Gay, Female, Senior Citizen a shot. Not that there is anything wrong with that.

[nascarnation]

I’d think you’re probably right.

I really doubt the Dems will go for another “don’t dare impeach me or you’ll get him” type like SlowJoe.

[forgotten man]

Too bad the first black president is also the worst president since James Buchanan. To add insult to injury he is not an American who descended from African slaves. I bet that there will not be another black president in the next 100 years, UNLESS HE IS A CONSERVATIVE.