Posted on 11/20/2014 2:21:09 PM PST by Tailgunner Joe
Iowa Senator Tom Harkin says he understands why President Obama will likely issue an executive order today providing temporary legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants. Harkin, a Democrat, blames the Republican-led U.S. House for its inaction on immigration. He notes, the Senate passed a bipartisan immigration reform bill 18 months ago, a bill that hasn’t yet come up for debate in the House.
“So, it’s forcing the president to do something on an executive basis, which, I would admit should be done legislatively, but the crisis is real and the president has to act, so keep that in mind.” Harkin says if House leaders would allow the bill to go to a vote, it would likely pass. He’s expecting the president to take action today where the legislative branch of government has failed.
“I think he’s going to clarify in an executive order what his lawyers tell him that he can do executively,” Harkin says. “I think he’s going to do something about the “dreamers,” the young kids who are brought here as children or young kids, to let them be a part of our society and go to college here.”
The most controversial part of the expected executive order would grant legal status, at least on a temporary basis, to as many as five-million immigrants who are now in the country illegally.
Harkin says, “I believe that he’s going to stay the deportation of certain segments of people who have been here for a long time and are working and paying their taxes and everything else in this country.”
One Republican U.S. Senator says the president’s actions today may spark violence and “anarchy” from immigration opponents. Harkin says the comments from Oklahoma Senator Tom Coburn go too far in predicting such a negative reaction about the president’s pending executive order. “I wish Mr. Coburn would use less inflammatory language,” Harkin says. “This is the kind of thing that stirs people up and implicates fear and anxiety in people rather than calmly discussing it and talking about it.”
The president is expected to address the nation from the White House tonight.
Hmm, didn’t the Democrats have a majority in both bodies on Capital Hill under Obama for his first two years?
Why wasn’t their rejection of Amnesty a cause for Executive Orders to fix it?
/johnny
“This is the kind of thing that stirs people up and implicates fear and anxiety in people rather than calmly discussing it and talking about it.”
Oh, you mean like the fascist left and their lapdog commie media has done in Ferguson?
Stupid SOB.
Where has Soetoro been for six years? Golfing.
It is predictable that ALL democratic comeback spin today is done verbatim from Obamas talking points passed out at the White House democrat dinner last night.
BS. Dims owned senate. They didn’t do anything about it.
we already have immigration laws, enforce them
Ya that’s right get the BLAME out first , LOL
I always wondered why the Dems didn’t pass “Cap & Tax” and “card check” when they held all 3 branches.
Some folks say they p*ssed away all their time with Obamacare....
No, inaction is the choice Mr. Doofus-head.
Worthless hypocrites, the lot of them. They would never say the same thing if the President was not of their party.
I’d like to hear ONE idiot Republican refute this twisted logic with something like:
Well, the Republicans haven’t “acted” on providing free food to all Americans, or they haven’t “acted” on conquering China and making it the 51st state either!
Why do they allow such easily refuted crap to stand???
Always has been....Always will be.
Good luck with logic from the GOPe..............
Inaction by Congress does NOT give the president the right to violate the Constitution.
Uh, Senator Harkin, a question, sir.
How many years did the Democrats have the House and the Senate? 2006-2010?
During that time the Democrats did not pass an immigration reform bill?
what inaction? We have immigration laws, the President needs to enforce them.
I wonder what would have happened if, using Senator Harkin’s logic, President Bush had just ordered drilling to commence in ANWR.
Or if President Bush just “reformed” Social Security on his own.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.