Skip to comments.
Immigration Reform Control Act of 1986 "NOTICE TO CONGRESS BEFORE IMPLEMENTING CHANGES" (Required)
Government Printing Office ^
| 1986
| US Congress
Posted on 11/22/2014 4:03:19 PM PST by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
To: Iron Munro
The statute of limitations has probably lapsed on the Obamacare suit [/sarc]
To: xzins
So not Indian Nations? I guess I needed to read it again.
/johnny
To: xzins
There were provisions for EO’s built into the legislation?!!!???
Never knew that....
Pretty awesome and further bolsters the imprimatur of Reagan’s EO, as per the law and under what circumstances.
FU Obama!!! And yer sycophants. ...
43
posted on
11/22/2014 4:50:37 PM PST
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously-you won't live through it anyway-Enjoy Yourself ala Louis Prima)
To: JRandomFreeper
Not in Article III, anyway. Could be elsewhere.
44
posted on
11/22/2014 4:50:39 PM PST
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: xzins
45
posted on
11/22/2014 4:54:29 PM PST
by
entropy12
(Dumb and Dumber to borrow money from China to protect oil flow to China from middle-east.)
To: holdonnow
how about thirty-two states bringing seperate lawsuits before the DC district asking for an injunction?
46
posted on
11/22/2014 4:56:11 PM PST
by
KC Burke
(Gowdy for Supreme Court)
To: xzins
Our Glorious Leader don’t need no stinking law. Our Glorious Leader is the law.
47
posted on
11/22/2014 4:59:27 PM PST
by
Bubba_Leroy
(The Obamanation Continues)
To: KC Burke
States can go directly to the Supremes per the Constitution.
/johnny
To: xzins
49
posted on
11/22/2014 5:04:35 PM PST
by
ziravan
(Choose Sides.)
To: Vendome; Chode
Pretty awesome and further bolsters the imprimatur of Reagan’s EO, as per the law and under what circumstances.
Reagan’s trap for them and saving act for us! He knew the Marxists would try to enslave the illegal vote at some point!
Chode, time for the and another one in the Ha Ha!
50
posted on
11/22/2014 5:08:34 PM PST
by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: xzins
with this find...
you might be the new Buckhead!
TAKE A Bow!
51
posted on
11/22/2014 5:08:52 PM PST
by
OL Hickory
(Jesus and the American soldier-1 died for your soul/1 died for your freedom)
To: xzins
If the President proposes to make any change regarding ****social security account number cards****, the President shall transmit to the Committee on Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and to the Committee on Finance of the Senate a written report setting forth the proposed change. The President promptly shall cause to have printed in the Federal Register the substance of any major change (described in subparagraph (D)) proposed and reported to Congress.
Hal Rogers, Mike Enzi v. Jeff Sessions and the rest of us.
52
posted on
11/22/2014 5:12:26 PM PST
by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: OL Hickory
Buckhead is a genius in a field; I was just reading the law. (And I’m neither a lawyer nor the son of a lawyer.)
Nonetheless, I hope this is relevant and stops this president in his lawless tracks.
53
posted on
11/22/2014 5:12:30 PM PST
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
To: Pride in the USA
Hmmm...if it’s all as clear as this, why haven’t we heard from a single member of Congress? Don’t they have staff researchers, legal counsel, and advisors whose job it is find this stuff?
54
posted on
11/22/2014 5:12:40 PM PST
by
lonevoice
(Life is short. Make fun of it.)
To: txhurl
55
posted on
11/22/2014 5:12:46 PM PST
by
Chode
(Stand UP and Be Counted, or line up and be numbered - *DTOM* -w- NO Pity for the LAZY - 86-44)
To: xzins
And we have Hal Rogers, General Dynamics as the smokin gun to the Chamber of Commerce attack aided by the Uniparty!
Thank you, SIR!
56
posted on
11/22/2014 5:16:44 PM PST
by
txhurl
(2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
To: JRandomFreeper
I know. I was just putting the rhetorical question to Mark.
57
posted on
11/22/2014 5:20:00 PM PST
by
KC Burke
(Gowdy for Supreme Court)
To: old curmudgeon
Does congress actually know the law? They are so busy studying campaign finance law for loopholes, they really don't have time for the other stuff.
58
posted on
11/22/2014 5:21:37 PM PST
by
Mr. Jeeves
(Heteropatriarchal Capitalist)
To: xzins
Every time I ask that question the answer is usually “they don’t have standing”......... I am beginning to wonder what the Supreme Court does?
To: Goreknowshowtocheat
Every time I ask that question the answer is usually “they don’t have standing”......... I am beginning to wonder what the Supreme Court does?
Always sitting. Nothing that involves standing.
60
posted on
11/22/2014 5:28:34 PM PST
by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-110 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
100% 
