Team Planning Guide for your "National Day of Reckoning" protest against Obama's Illegal Amnesty - (click)
.
Posted on 11/23/2014 7:05:37 PM PST by upchuck
“What...is the end game for Republicans? Seriously. Demise?”
Probably, Obama was right about “the two thirds” who did not vote. If they should ever decide to get of the couch and vote conservatives will never win another election. Don’t know that there is a end-game persea. However, my crystal ball foresees the gradual Balkanization of America. I don’t foresee a Civil War nor the break up of the country. But, I think there will be a gradual migration of people towards regions more compatible with their cultural, religious, and political values. And, there will be more autonomy within these respective regions. In fact, appears to me that this shift is well underway.
Viola? Viola Law. She's Marshall's wife.
Americans have taken a long hard look at the kind of fundamental transformation promised by Barack Obama and the Democrat party and they want nothing to do with it.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Elections have consequences.
[ LIKE :-) ]
WOW!
What a tough guy.
Instead of a Blitzkreig, Boner and Mitchy are leading a Sitzkreig.
What the heck? Don’t force those morons into Canada, we have enough, we’re trying to correct that ship.
Well said. 74 and still working. Will have to work till I they pry that screwdriver out of my cold, stiff hand.
I have had it with these self centered punks.
Thanks for the post!
“So to everyone who voted, I want you to know I hear you. To the two-thirds of voters who chose not to participate in the process yesterday, I hear you, too,” he said.
Meaning what?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Meaning we have a regular half-wit in the WH who needs a sphincter on his mouth-because he is so clueless.
Over my dead body is all I have to say.
Why is it that so many members of the Canadian (and British) press have a better understanding of what this country’s *really* about than does our own press? Maybe it’s because they know that they’re beyond the reach of the Department of Just Us,the IRS and David Axelrod.
Obama named himself Lincoln for a reason. He’s built up homeland insecurity goons for a reason and corrupted the FBI. He’s armed radicals in every lefty agency. He’s stirring up Nationwide “progressive” violence in the voice of a race war.
Yeah, war is possible.
We should be concerned whether Republican Majority is real...as Obama alluded.
Can Republicans keep majorities in both Houses of Congress during Presidential Election years, and can Republicans win the White House?
I CONTEND that if they fail to turn back Amnesty, in all forms, to include the form the Republicans envision, they'll never have the White House again and never another Congressional Majority.
Certainly a third party would emerge, and potentially win.
Think UKIP.
Lame Duck...?
No...Lame Leftist!
My apologies, Tupelo. That was a bit over the top.
I guess I’m just so angry about the events of our times that I’m losing my patience and composure. Even with friends and allies.
I’m sorry.
I ask you this: Would you back a revolution (as described in the article) if it meant losing SS? I say most people especially seniors would not so therefore there will be no revolution. Too many people in this country rely on a check from the government to ever support a change that involves eliminating that check. Without eliminating those checks we will continue with our socialist democracy.
The context of these posts is the article’s suggestion of a revolution.
Classify me as at the tail end of the baby boom.
Anyone who depends on a check from the government, no matter how well deserved, earned, or needed is dependent on the government. If your sole source of income is from a government check then you are solely reliant on the government for your welfare.
If you are reliant upon the government for your income how likely are you to support any movement towards restricting that government to its lawful activities under the US Constitution?
Are we going to have a revolution that makes sure all deserving people keep their checks? What government benefit are you willing to give up to take back our country?
Several of those patriots in my family. They didn’t die to preserve my SS benefit. I would not hesitate to forgo it if it meant supporting what they died for. I despise all of the welfare schemes that have enfeebled our ability to live our lives free from government “assistance”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.