Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: COPS: NYT Reporter Who Published #DarrenWilson Address Calling Cops Nonstop
Got News ^ | 1/28/14

Posted on 11/28/2014 9:20:55 PM PST by Impala64ssa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last
To: who knows what evil?

She made her bed...


121 posted on 11/29/2014 6:32:06 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
...but they did not publish the full address..

"What difference, at this point, does it make?"


122 posted on 11/29/2014 6:41:15 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: ASA Vet

“It’s rumored that she has somewhat atoned for printing Officer Wilson’s home address by opening her home to him and his family as a ‘safe-house.’ “

I’m betting she asked him (and his fellow officer wife) to bring their weapons...especially since the local cops have put her at the bottom of their priority list.


123 posted on 11/29/2014 6:47:03 AM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

“..........Suddenly what she did to Officer Warren”.......

I believe that would be “Officer Wilson”.


124 posted on 11/29/2014 6:59:57 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

What a self-righteous pig of a “journalist”. That she would endanger a policeman and his family is beyond disgusting. One can only hope that Justice finds her. Being fired should be the first repercussion for her act.


125 posted on 11/29/2014 7:10:02 AM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Din Maker
Even with the internet and all the technology today, it’s still almost impossible to get a person’s cell phone number.

I have to disagree with you. MANY people put there cell phones on facebook, linkedin, a plethora of sites. Its not hard to correlate this info.

126 posted on 11/29/2014 7:15:52 AM PST by Ghost of SVR4 (So many are so hopelessly dependent on the government that they will fight to protect it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: MNDude

Hopefully it is true.


127 posted on 11/29/2014 7:44:00 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
The address was never posted by the Times. People really are gullible.

.

Fox News report on New York Times

128 posted on 11/29/2014 8:12:25 AM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Impala64ssa

I blame the NYT editors as much as the author. There must have been several layers of editorial approval before that article went to print.

It wasn’t an accident. The NYT times published those personal details because they wanted to.


129 posted on 11/29/2014 8:36:10 AM PST by 04-Bravo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #130 Removed by Moderator

To: Karl Spooner

Naming the street is not publishing an address. They are two vastly different things. Also, they haven’t lived at the listed address for quite some time. If the reporter had actually wanted to cause harm, she would have used the current address.


131 posted on 11/29/2014 9:05:51 AM PST by arderkrag (NO ONE IS OUT TO GET YOU.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

Maybe she didn’t have the current address and was ‘fishin’ around for someone to give it to her.

Who did that journolist who leased a house right next to Sarah to harass her work for?


132 posted on 11/29/2014 9:41:30 AM PST by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Brother Cracker

And she uses her nasty little RAT teeth to gnaw up her nasty little RAT fingernails. I sense Daddy issues.


133 posted on 11/29/2014 9:43:27 AM PST by txhurl (2014: Stunned Voters do Stunning Things!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

134 posted on 11/29/2014 9:49:58 AM PST by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box than 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine


Suck it up, Buttercup!

135 posted on 11/29/2014 9:52:30 AM PST by onyx (Please Support Free Republic - Donate Monthly! If you want on Sarah Palin's Ping List, Let Me know!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag

The Times thought they had the right house. Which makes it worse yet because someone else could be living there. Also, since they did list the street, there is a AFP photo showing the house and the mailbox with the street address on it. Without the street, it would have been more difficult to find.


136 posted on 11/29/2014 10:06:59 AM PST by Karl Spooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; .....Read more at http://www.snopes.com...
This came from Snopes?!?Anything from Snopes you really need to take not with a grain of salt, but the entire salt mine! CONSIDER THE SOURCE.
137 posted on 11/29/2014 10:24:46 AM PST by Impala64ssa (You call me an islamophobe like it's a bad thing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
The Times did mention that Wilson and his wife own a house in Crestwood and referenced the street name, but they did not publish the full address; moreover, that information was neither current nor revelatory in nature since (as noted in the same article) the Wilsons had vacated the house months earlier, and that same information had already been widely disseminated back in August 2014 in coverage of the Mike Brown case published major newspapers such as the Washington Post and the Boston Globe Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/business/wilsontimes.asp#yr3UHJAlo7OfJd43.99

This defies even the most lightly-applied level of logic.

What is the newsworthiness of publishing even the street name of the Wilsons?

Further, what is the newsworthiness of publishing the street from which they vacated?

Finally, what is happening to you? You seem to be drifting to the Dark Side.

138 posted on 11/29/2014 10:57:37 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: arderkrag
Naming the street is not publishing an address. They are two vastly different things. Also, they haven’t lived at the listed address for quite some time. If the reporter had actually wanted to cause harm, she would have used the current address.

Besides, those damned Jews had it coming to them, dominating every level of business and banking like they did. Bringing them to a concentration camp doesn't actually cause them harm.

WTF is going on with you?

139 posted on 11/29/2014 10:59:39 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Deciding Female Criminal Guilt By How Hot They Are Since 1999 !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: onyx; DJ MacWoW

Bump and ping.


140 posted on 11/29/2014 11:20:57 AM PST by Darksheare (People who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 181-196 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson