If they had one, why would they say this, and increase the risk of getting caught & stopped?
A smoke detector?
I’d check out Rome around the Vatican....
At least the White House is safe. No Islamic terrorist would endanger their most influential ally - a mole at the very highest level of what is supposed to be our government.
I doubt this claim as it would violate operational security to reveal your intention in advance and jeopardize the mission. Having said that, we can’t be sure they don’t have such a device. During the war with Russia the Chechnyans claimed to have a nuclear bomb. The Russians said, “Oh, yeah? Tell us the serial number and we’ll deal.” That was the last I heard about it. So, bluffs tend not to work. (Incidentally, the fact that the Russians had to ask that question scares the hell out of me.)
It will take several 9/11 style attacks where lots of liberals are killed before we will be allowed to fight back. If they happen look for all of the Palestinian sympathizers to get booed off the stage.
I guess we’ll have to have the muslims control their more excitable brethren: a weapon of mass destruction goes of in the West then mecca will glow for 1,000 years.
“While it is difficult to assess the veracity of Al-Britani’s claims, U.S. officials have expressed concern about IS potentially smuggling nuclear and radioactive material out of Iraq...”
++++
And this “radioactive material” was left in Iraq because ... ?
The French should test one of their La BOOM on ISIS
Time for the EU to make a joint statement that use of any radioactive device by ISIS within European borders will be met with dropping of a really large radioactive device in the middle of Mecca and Medina and they’re not kidding.
No need to worry about this. One needs only try to ‘empathize’ with the mind that would engineer this plot. After that...serenity.
Time for 0bama to lecture Europe about using harsh interrogation techniques and for Hillary to lecture them about being empathetic towards jihadis.
Nice timing...tomorrow we’re going public about how we tortured them after 9-11.
If they really had one, would they really say it's in Europe?
Or...you get my point. Though they do gain credibility and greater terror with future announcements if there's any meat to this. Finding a low-energy source will prove challenging (it doesn't have to be Pu235 to be a terror weapon).
We don't have the intel to identify dogs in use at a terrorist compound and now we're hunting nukes (or is it 'Wabbit'?).
I'm cynical of the threat and the effort to contain it. Color me 'in a mood'...
Maybe we'll finally see the wreckage of MH370 in the coming days/weeks.../s
They are lying. I double-dog dare them to prove otherwise.
London and Paris should be worried...