I wonder if New Yorkers are feeling any buyer's remorse over picking this moron over the other great Democrat candidate ... Carlos Danger (a.k.a. Anthony Weiner).
He could probably still clear fifty-plus percent of the vote. The problem I see....the Cops and Firemen union will be totally against him from this point on out. The teachers union might still side with him...at least until he does some budget cuts. The anti-frisk crowd will also stick with him...until criminal statistics go sour.
Cardinal Dolan sided with this scumbag,which is par for the course.
Protesters prepare for more demonstrations in wake of NYPD officers deaths
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/protesters-prepare-march-wake-nypd-officers-deaths-article-1.2053132
Looking for a photo op, no more, no less.
If so, they aren't saying because New Yorkers are never wrong.
DeBlasio is an avowed Democratic Socialist who raised money for the atheist Sandinistas! His appearance in St Patrick’s Cathedral was merely for show, and a poor one at that.
He contributed to the environment of hate that gunned down these police officers. He and Sharpton, Obama and Holder caused this to happen, through their political lying and poor leadership. This is the closest the nation has come to a race war, and it is getting worse. These people are a disaster.
NYC and it’s voting residents are no smarter than voters in Detroit. New Yor City is over rated and little more than an armpit that businesses are moving out of. Want to see the future of NYC? Look at Detroit, MI and Chicago, IL.
The smart, rich people are moving out. NYC will last longer because of the “prestige” associated with the media. But that too will pass.
He considers Al Sharpton his friend and confidant. Didn’t Al lead the rally where they chanted,
“What do we want?”
“Dead Cops!”
“When do we want it?”
“Now!!!”
That is the sort of friends democrats keep.
de Blasio is as much a Catholic as is Nancy Pelosi. In other words, he isn’t. Yet they are both more than willing to pretend to be Catholics, if they think they can use the church to their advantage.
Which raises a theological questions: should the church offer sanctuary to an unrepentant pagan who hates and wants to destroy the church? Or really, not sanctuary, but defense from public scorn?
Neither of the officers were Catholic, btw.
Seems appropriate for him to be in a Catholic Church, since he seems to be in lockstep with Pope Francis.