[Academiadotorg]

haters gonna hate.

[skeeter]

What small minds progressives have.

[PGR88]

Conservatives are losing the cultural and political battle, because we’ve already lost the financial battle. We live in a financial system that allows maximum power of government, its cronies, and political lackeys.

[FlingWingFlyer]

Douglas sounds like she might not be right in the head. The perfect commie ‘RAT “educator”.

[ElkGroveDan]

Journalism Educator “Hates” Republicans and Loves Marxism

[Biggirl]

I see good news in all this!

The conservative side is “resurging”, thanks to what is going on as of now. DO NOT BELIEVE otherwise.

Angry blowback is coming.

[Gaffer]

..... “marrying a Republican is unimaginable to me…”

Having located her picture, the only polite thing I could say is that I don't see how any Republican would want to....

[ScottinVA]

“marrying a Republican is unimaginable to me…”

Just as having relations with a (ugh... gag...) feminazi leftist woman would be unimaginable to me (gag.. urp..).

[samtheman]

A specialist on “Gender and the Media,”

Wow. What an important specialty. She must be very highly educated to have that as a specialty. And extremely intelligent. You can't be just any old leftist dummy and be a Specialist on Gender and the Media.

Just imagine how DEEP that is!

[Starboard]

Its amazing how many “professors” there are who make a good living spouting drivel and emotional nonsense of little or no value. Being an ideological specialist and purveyor of BS evidently pays well and makes for a long career in academia. Conservatives need not apply however.

[Borges]

How can one be a ‘specialist’ on Gender?

[duffee]

If she hates republicans what must she think of Conservatives?

[cripplecreek]

She’s the idiot who moderated the “Non partisan” seminar about the GOP war on women a couple years ago.

[ScottinVA]

No worries, Susan.. no self-respecting GOPer or conservative would venture within 20 feet of you, either.

[ScottinVA]

Something about liberal women and that hair-chopped-up-by hedge-trimmers look... Good gawd, they're an ugly lot... inside and out.

[mjp]

political conservatives tend toward certain psychological characteristics,” such as “Dogmatism, rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity; a need to avoid uncertainty; support for authoritarianism; a heightened sense of threat from others; and a personal need for structure.

sounds more like a description of emotionalistic libtards filled with fear and hate like Susan J. Douglas

[Billthedrill]

She insists in the article that a “series of studies has found that political conservatives tend toward certain psychological characteristics,” such as “Dogmatism, rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity; a need to avoid uncertainty; support for authoritarianism; a heightened sense of threat from others; and a personal need for structure.”

That's a pretty fair working description of an academic Marxist, actually. One wonders if she was looking into a mirror when she wrote it.

[GOPJ]

Here’s a flash... the rest of us LOOK DOWN on liberal elite Gruber nose-in the-air assh*les...

[Ban Draoi Marbh Draoi]

Wonder what she would think if some conservative student with a subversive turn of mind were to throw a bucket of red paint (=blood) on her office door to represent the 100,000,000 + people killed in the name of the bloody ideology she embraces?

[bray]

The Three Pillars of Propaganda (media, academia and the DNC) have promoted Marxism for decades.

Pray America is waking

[iacovatx]

]quote]She insists in the article that a “series of studies has found that political conservatives tend toward certain psychological characteristics,” such as “Dogmatism, rigidity and intolerance of ambiguity; a need to avoid uncertainty; support for authoritarianism; a heightened sense of threat from others; and a personal need for structure.” [end quote]

This is from the early 1950s and was an attempt to link fascism/nazism to cognitive and mental ills. It is often trotted-out by communists as support for their hatred of normal conservative people. The research doesn’t meet standards of scientific objectivity or theoretical integrity. It was research designed to give legitimacy to communist and hard left ideology. Adorno and Frenkel-Brunswik were early figures in this. A good critique of this was made in the late-80s by JJ Ray but the bottom line is it is unsound in theory and in study.