To: Kackikat
I agree with you, but the judge’s ruling is based on tax law. If you’re business is not incorporated, you assume personal liability.
7 posted on
01/07/2015 5:23:37 PM PST by
Jonty30
(What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults)
To: Jonty30
but the judge’s ruling is based on tax law. It isn't based on tax law. It is based on the homosexual-agenda Washington Law Against Discrimination.
8 posted on
01/07/2015 5:26:01 PM PST by
steve86
(Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc OÂ’Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
To: Jonty30
No, based on the WLAD, which appears to pierce the corporate liability protections. She’ll be bankrupted. The Sodomites are winning.
9 posted on
01/07/2015 5:27:13 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Pointing out dereliction of duty is NOT fear mongering, especially in a panDEMic)
To: Jonty30
I know what you are saying, but ‘freedom of religion’ is in the First Amendment that also covers ‘free speech.’ So what personal liability? The Judge is wrong.
She has right to deny to serve whomever she pleases. Otherwise it’s a violation of her Constitutional rights to ‘freedom of religion”.
11 posted on
01/07/2015 5:27:21 PM PST by
Kackikat
('If it talks like a traitor, acts like a traitor, then by God it's a traitor.')
To: Jonty30
Arlene's Flowers was incorporated in 1989. They are trying to go around this to get to her personally and shouldn't be able to.
http://www.adfmedia.org/files/ArlenesFlowersPartialSJmotionPersonalCapacity.pdf
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson