"....did he cry?"
Posted on 01/08/2015 12:04:45 PM PST by jazusamo
48 second Video at link.
(CNSNews.com) - House Speaker John Boehner (R.-Ohio) vowed today to fight “tooth and nail” against President Obama’s unilateral amnesty of up to five million illegal aliens—an amnesty the administration has been able to move forward with because Boehner’s House permitted funding of it. The 1,603-page omnibus spending bill that Boehner pushed through a lame-duck Republican-controlled House last month put no prohibition on Obama using government funds to implement the amnesty. That omnibus funded almost all the government through the end of this fiscal year on Sept. 30 and the Department of Homeland Security through Feb. 27.
“The House will soon take action aimed at stopping the president’s unilateral action when it comes to immigration,” Boehner said at his press briefing today. “Republicans are in agreement that this is a gravely serious matter.”
“The president's unilateral actions were an affront to the rule of law and our system of government,” Boehner said. “The American people don't support it and as their representatives we cannot let it stand.”
“I said we'd fight it tooth and nail when we had two majorities in the House and Senate and I meant it,” Boehner said. “What is at risk is the rule of law and the sanctity of America’s Constitution. The president has taken action that is beyond the scope of his ability and the Congress cannot just sit here and look the other way. We have to take action.”
Because last month’s omnibus put no restriction on Obama using money to implement his amnesty, the president is free to do so at this time. Had the Republican-controlled House attached language to last month’s omnibus prohibiting spending on the amnesty, Obama would have needed to shut down the entire government (by vetoing the bill) to try to force the Republican House to give him the money.
Now, the only funding bill the Republicans in Congress can use to stop Obama’s amnesty is the bill that will be needed to fund the Department of Homeland Security after Feb. 27. If the Republicans attach language to that bill prohibiting Obama from spending money to implement his amnesty, Obama will only need to shutdown DHS to try to force the Republicans to give him the money to implement it.
At his briefing, Boehner said he did not think the funding of DHS was "at risk" and said that Republicans wanted to fund the department.
A reporter asked: "Is this a wise time to be putting the budget of the Homeland Security Department at risk? The head of the department said it poses a real risk to have a continuing resolution without any certainty. Does he have any validity to his argument?"
"I don't believe that the funding of the department is in fact at risk," Boehner responded. "What is at risk is the rule of law and the sanctity of America's Constitution. The president has taken actions that are beyond the scope of his ability. And Congress cannot just sit here and look the other way. We have to take action, and we will."
The reporter, who made no mention of the fact that it would take a presidential veto to stop the DHS funding bill, followed up, saying: "Can you imagine something like this happening after 9/11 though. Given the attacks yesterday in Paris can you imagine the Homeland Security budget being up for debate a month after, or a day after, something like that happened here."
Boehner responded: "The issue isn't about funding the Department of Homeland Security. Members of Congress support funding the department. But we cannot continue to allow the president to go around the Congress and go around the law and take unilateral action as he has."
Another reporter asked if the House would "never pass a DHS funding bill that doesn't include some sort of provision" to stop Obama's unilateral amnesty.
"The House is going to work its will," Boehner said. "The way the process works is once the House works its will, the Senate will work its will. And then we have options. We can go to conference. We can take the Senate bill. There are a lot of options available to us. When we pass our bill, we'll see what the Senate can do with it and then we will act."
A third reporter asked if Boehner would allow an "open rule" on the DHS bill, which would let members freely offer amendments to the bill.
"I don't know what the Rules Committee will decide," Boehner said. "But I've got my doubts that it will be a truly open rule. But I do suspect that there will be amendments allowed."
If the Republicans pass a stand-alone bill to stop Obama’s amnesty, the president can simply veto that stand-alone bill. It would then take a two-thirds majority in both houses to enact it.
PFL
” We can go to conference. We can take the Senate bill. There are a lot of options available to us.”
Suicide is an option too, John.
"....did he cry?"
Sometimes one has to believe it takes members of Congress to wipe each others butts just to get out of the toilet.
Silence purist scum!....It’s a lesser evil. We like those here. Obviously you helped elect Barry and love Pelosi..
/S
More like Orange to my eyes.
Obama’s executive amnesty consists of a speech and a memo. What is Bonehead going to fight, and how is he going to fight it, with his own speech and memo?
Whatever.
Bump
In related news, OJ Simpson is fighting tooth and nail to find the real killer of his wife.
The cryin Cheeto is as dishonest as his BFF Soetoro.
What a joke.
Who on earth really believes this? Other than the usual crowd of beltway-centric, rah-rah-Republican talking heads on FoxNews?
Hey, Big Cheeto, talk is cheap.
I may be one of the most involved people in the Tea Party movement on FR. I speak at many events, I schedule speakers for our group in California, I promote them at gun shows. I write books on our Constitution and how to fight liberalism.
"We" don't hate him. I understand why you're angry, but the time to fight Obama was not in the last session. It is now, it is when we have control of the legislature. If our nation means anything to you, stop fragging and get to fighting the right people.
You read FR lately? Hell on this thread itself People still defend this POS.Give him a chane What if he/they...! The Dem is worse!!
Rallying cries of the Republican political coward.
No, he thinks/knows we are.
They aren't; mutually exclusive.
A better explanation is he is on Obama's team.
He doesn't believe in any conservative ideas.
He will fight "tooth and nail" against conservatives.
....it’s too bad the Tea Party isn’t pushing for Open Borders. Then it wouldn’t even make it out of committee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.