Skip to comments.
Tillis: Restaurant workers shouldn't be forced to wash hands after bathroom breaks
Fox News ^
| 2/4/15
| Anon
Posted on 02/04/2015 6:19:08 AM PST by DoodleDawg
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Ok so let me see if I have this right. Tillis is
against the government forcing restaurants to require that their employees wash their hands after using the bathroom, but
for the government forcing restaurants to post signs saying that their employees may or may not have washed their hands after using the bathroom?
I swear we elect idiots to Congress.
To: DoodleDawg
Typhoid has to make a comeback tour don’t you know?
2
posted on
02/04/2015 6:20:54 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
To: DoodleDawg
You can’t fix stupid. But it can be elected to office.
3
posted on
02/04/2015 6:21:09 AM PST
by
Autonomous User
(During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.)
To: DoodleDawg
Shut up and sing, Mel...
4
posted on
02/04/2015 6:21:15 AM PST
by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter admits whom he's working for)
To: DoodleDawg
This is the problem with a phony conservative....they try and flex their conservative muscles in all the wrong places.....and end up looking like dorks.
To: DoodleDawg
Why would any Republican go there? Regardless of the merits of the political philosophy underlying the statement he should know the leftist media will present him as a kook.
To: DoodleDawg
Tillis: Restaurant workers shouldn't be forced to wash hands after bathroom breaks Is a lobotomy part of the congressional indoctrination process?
7
posted on
02/04/2015 6:23:42 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(OK. Now How many votes do we need to IMPEACH and REMOVE the bastard?)
To: DoodleDawg
They shouldn’t be forced by Federal statute. However they could by state statute. Problem solved.
The Federal government should not be involved in such minutiae as hand-washing by restaurant workers.
8
posted on
02/04/2015 6:24:10 AM PST
by
cotton1706
(ThisRepublic.net)
To: DoodleDawg
Poppy is a little sloppy...
9
posted on
02/04/2015 6:24:41 AM PST
by
thedrake
To: DoodleDawg
Tillis must be a runaway from a zoo. The man is sick in the head.
10
posted on
02/04/2015 6:25:12 AM PST
by
mulligan
(I)
To: DoodleDawg
11
posted on
02/04/2015 6:25:21 AM PST
by
workerbee
(The President of the United States is PUBLIC ENEMY #1)
To: DoodleDawg
Don’t wash your hands but you will get a vaccination?
12
posted on
02/04/2015 6:27:25 AM PST
by
mountainlion
(Live well for those that did not make it back.)
To: Darksheare; DoodleDawg
I would NOT shake hands with such an employee!!!
13
posted on
02/04/2015 6:28:16 AM PST
by
danamco
(-)
To: cotton1706
They shouldnt be forced by Federal statute. However they could by state statute. Problem solved. If his stated goal is to reduce regulatory burden on business then what difference does it make if that burden comes at the state level or the federal level? A burden is a burden is a burden. And apparently some burdens, i.e. forcing employees to wash hands, are wrong while while other burdens, i.e. forcing establishments to post signs thate employees don't wash hands, are perfectly OK.
To: cotton1706
Is that what he was trying to say, or is that what you wish he had said?
15
posted on
02/04/2015 6:28:20 AM PST
by
Lee'sGhost
("Just look at the flowers, Lizzie. Just look at the flowers.")
To: DoodleDawg
A law FORCING employees to wash their hands is an unenforceable law.
16
posted on
02/04/2015 6:29:21 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: danamco
I would NOT shake hands with such an employee!!! After hearing his opinions on the matter I'm not sure I'd want to shake hands with Tillis.
To: DoodleDawg
> Ok so let me see if I have this right. Tillis is against the government forcing restaurants to require that their employees wash their hands after using the bathroom, but for the government forcing restaurants to post signs saying that their employees may or may not have washed their hands after using the bathroom?
I swear we elect idiots to Congress.
I’d say make them take an IQ test but we know they’d rig it for book knowledge that has little, if any, application to real life or common sense. I say take them out to a forest, dump them and strip them of their electronic devices and credit cards and see if they can last a month. If they can it will change them and they will no longer be liberals.
To: Darksheare; DoodleDawg
Tillis needs be drug tested!!!
19
posted on
02/04/2015 6:30:12 AM PST
by
danamco
(-)
To: DoodleDawg
He is talking about regulatory burden. If you think about it employee hand-washing is really on the honor system. How much should the government involve itself in the regulation of employees washing their hands after using the bathroom? Should they require a bathroom monitor that inspects all the hands as employees leave the bathroom?
I think what he is saying how involved should the government be? The feds already regulate a bunch and should it really be micro-managing the act of hand-washing?
20
posted on
02/04/2015 6:30:47 AM PST
by
Slyfox
(To put on the mind of George Washington read ALL of Deuteronomy 28, then read his Farewell Address)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-106 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson