Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP senators block Ted Cruz move to hold up Loretta Lynch vote
Politico ^ | 02/04/2015 | SEUNG MIN KIM and BURGESS EVERETT

Posted on 02/05/2015 4:50:47 AM PST by GIdget2004

Texas Sen. Ted Cruz’s strategy of blocking a vote on President Barack Obama’s attorney general nominee until the White House relents on immigration executive actions ran into a brick wall Wednesday: his own GOP colleagues.

Republican senators dismissed Cruz’s proposal for denying Loretta Lynch a confirmation vote in the Judiciary Committee and on the Senate floor as part of the Texas firebrand’s strategy to use “every procedural tool” at the Senate’s disposal to override Obama’s actions, which could affect nearly 5 million undocumented immigrants.

Disagreement with Cruz’s latest tactic was voiced by Republicans who both support and oppose Lynch’s nomination to succeed Attorney General Eric Holder, and came despite the fact that other ways of expressing GOP opposition to the immigration moves have hit roadblocks.

“Republicans have been complaining about Eric Holder for a long time; this is an opportunity to make that change,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), who plans to vote for Lynch. “I don’t think we should delay it at all. I think we ought to get her over there and get her working.”

Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, Cruz’s home-state colleague, announced Wednesday that he’ll oppose Lynch’s nomination based on her testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee supporting Obama’s sweeping immigration moves, as well as other Obama administration policies. But Lynch getting a vote should not hinge on Obama’s executive actions, Cornyn said: “I would not couple those two, personally.”

And Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), asked about Cruz’s effort, responded: “That’s not my position.” Flake has also said that he will support Lynch. “The president ought to get his people as long as there’s no disqualifying substance there, and I don’t think there is with her.”

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 02/05/2015 4:50:47 AM PST by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Of course the dem operatives would, they are bought and paid for.


2 posted on 02/05/2015 4:53:41 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Someone remind me again why it was so imperative to vote for GOP candidates last NOV.


3 posted on 02/05/2015 4:54:36 AM PST by Arm_Bears (Rope. Tree. Politician. Some assembly required.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Who does that surprise?


4 posted on 02/05/2015 4:54:43 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

because if you don’t _______________[fill in blank] will happen. What they did not tell you is that if you voted GOP, the GOP electees would help _______[fill in blank] to happen.


5 posted on 02/05/2015 4:59:27 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

I am no longer associated with the GOP or republicans...I am done! !


6 posted on 02/05/2015 4:59:29 AM PST by seeker41 (take your country back by whatever means necessary & remove the son of a kenyan mooslimb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

The GOPe is a dead political party. Orin Hatch is Exhibit A.


7 posted on 02/05/2015 5:00:14 AM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

‘Republicans have been complaining about Eric Holder for a long time; this is an opportunity to make that change,”...

***

Someone please tell me how electing an even more entrenched communist with no respect for the rule of law would be an improvement over Holder.


8 posted on 02/05/2015 5:02:18 AM PST by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare

So are the Republican operatives, My FRiend. So are the Republican operatives. Both have the same goal. They just differ on how to get there.


9 posted on 02/05/2015 5:02:27 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

“Republicans have been complaining about Eric Holder for a long time; this is an opportunity to make that change”

Only a true politician would dare to pull off a line like that one.


10 posted on 02/05/2015 5:04:56 AM PST by rightwingcrazy (:>@)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41

Join the club.


11 posted on 02/05/2015 5:06:20 AM PST by Night Hides Not (Remember the Alamo! Remember Goliad! Remember Mississippi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Remember when Osama was in the senate, he sure had no problem filibustering / denying floor votes to Bush appointees like Alito.

The Republican Party is beyond weak. Even worse than Hatch or Flake —who at least are honest about stabbing conservatives in the back — a guy like Cornyn is the worst liar. He ensures her confirmation by allowing a floor vote then votes against her for the record. How many times must we see this bait and switch.


12 posted on 02/05/2015 5:10:32 AM PST by crusader71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sport

Pretty certain they are the same in most cases.


13 posted on 02/05/2015 5:15:52 AM PST by Darksheare (Those who support liberal "Republicans" summarily support every action by same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
“I don’t see any need for Congress to confirm somebody to be the chief law enforcement officer of this nation who is at that table insisting that she intends to execute a policy that is contrary to law and to what Congress desires and what the American people desire. And says that someone here unlawfully is as much entitled to a job in this as somebody who is here lawfully. It is just beyond my comprehension,” Sessions said.

And Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), asked about Cruz’s effort, responded: “That’s not my position.” Flake has also said that he will support Lynch. “The president ought to get his people as long as there’s no disqualifying substance there, and I don’t think there is with her.”

Senator Flake ... if her own 'contrary to law' testimony isn't, what on earth would be a "disqualifying substance" for you?!

14 posted on 02/05/2015 5:18:28 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

This alone should make people finally quit being delusional by thinking that the destruction of America can be stopped by elections.

It can’t and won’t be stopped.

So instead of delusions of “hoping”, that another election will fix it, people need to be thinking about reality.

No one person can turn this nightmare around. The American people are going to have to pull their heads out of the sand and realize that all is about lost.

We may not have much longer to communicate. They are taking over the internet.

Never dreamed that we were so pliable.

And don’t ask me what I would do. I can’t do anything about it any more than Ted Cruz or Jeff Sessions. If they can’t do it, neither can I.


15 posted on 02/05/2015 5:22:14 AM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Does the flake, Flake realize that lynch was a sorority sister of Sharon holder and this is a move to prevent eric holder being prosecuted for crimes and treason?


16 posted on 02/05/2015 5:27:10 AM PST by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arm_Bears

“Someone remind me again why it was so imperative to vote for GOP candidates last NOV.”

Because Cruz wouldn’t even be allowed to speak on the Senate floor if Hairy Reed was still in charge.


17 posted on 02/05/2015 5:27:16 AM PST by Beagle8U (NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

This party is soooo stupid, and so infected with left-think. I don’t want any part of it. I was going to get more involved with my local chapter, but at this point, I don’t want to. What can I change anymore if the higher ups keep you down?

Truly, it is time for a new party.


18 posted on 02/05/2015 5:29:13 AM PST by Thorliveshere (Minnesota Survivor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Damn


19 posted on 02/05/2015 5:31:05 AM PST by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

For all those who voted for the lesser evil...


20 posted on 02/05/2015 5:43:18 AM PST by Timber Rattler (Just say NO! to RINOS and the GOP-E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson