To: sukhoi-30mki
Is Rooshin, must be beegger.
That worked so well during the USSR years.
2 posted on
02/11/2015 5:28:43 AM PST by
OpusatFR
To: sukhoi-30mki
Lease one of ours, we’re not using ‘em...
3 posted on
02/11/2015 5:31:43 AM PST by
Old Sarge
(Its the Sixties all over again, but with crappy music...)
To: sukhoi-30mki
There will be a protracted study, design, and engineering phase, with schedule delays, bloated budgets, and mysteriously missing funds. Eventually, the project will be revised for a new concept with a new round of funding. The chance of a major Russian naval aircraft carrier ever being deployed is nil.
To: sukhoi-30mki
5 posted on
02/11/2015 5:33:42 AM PST by
4yearlurker
(Some people say that experts agree!!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Any investment in huge surface warships is foolish. These ships are very vulnerable to flocks of “seagull drones” each packed with 1 kg of C4 plastique, launched by a submarine hundreds of miles away and directed to target via satellite. These big ships simply cannot survive.
6 posted on
02/11/2015 5:35:32 AM PST by
allendale
To: sukhoi-30mki
However, any indication of Russian plans should be taken with skepticism.Holds true for anything you read these days. Didn't Brian Williams do a report on this.
7 posted on
02/11/2015 5:37:07 AM PST by
McGruff
(Haters Gonna Hate)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Coming to you in the year 2077!
8 posted on
02/11/2015 5:37:53 AM PST by
KC_Lion
(Build the America you want to live in at your address, and keep looking up.- Sarah Palin)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Well, if it fails they can always sell it off to India then charge them out the butt to refit it.
9 posted on
02/11/2015 5:38:56 AM PST by
ryan71
(The Partisans)
To: sukhoi-30mki
That will be a mighty big target.
10 posted on
02/11/2015 5:39:57 AM PST by
Skooz
(Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Design fail...those oars won't reach the water.
13 posted on
02/11/2015 5:47:37 AM PST by
RetSignman
(Obama is the walking, talking middle finger in the face of America)
To: sukhoi-30mki
nice bannister,, or is that balusters??
14 posted on
02/11/2015 5:47:38 AM PST by
ßuddaßudd
(>> F U B O << "What the hell kind of country is this if I can only hate a man if he's white?")
To: sukhoi-30mki
OK, whatever.
Looking back, it's hard to believe we ever used to worry about these folks.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Those oars in the front are going to need to be lengthened. bit.
24 posted on
02/11/2015 5:59:42 AM PST by
Scutter
To: sukhoi-30mki
31 posted on
02/11/2015 6:09:25 AM PST by
central_va
(I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
The Kuznetsov is Russia's only functioning carrier. "Functioning" is a relative term.
To: sukhoi-30mki
Are they going to build it out of Pykrete?
To: sukhoi-30mki
It should help restore the empire and return the slave nations to their rightful owners.
45 posted on
02/11/2015 7:12:20 AM PST by
elhombrelibre
(Against Obama. Against Putin. Pro-freedom. Pro-US Constitution.)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Good! That means we can sink 100 planes at a time.
53 posted on
02/11/2015 8:23:31 AM PST by
SgtHooper
(Anyone who remembers the 60's, wasn't there!)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Makes no sense. A/C's are 1940-1990's era weaponry.
Now they are mostly just big ole' Submarine Targets.
Smaller. More agile. Railgun equipped. Laser equipped. THAT is the future.
57 posted on
02/11/2015 8:39:50 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(With friends like Boehner, we don't need Democrats. -- Laz A. Mataz, 2015)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
Design fail...those oars won't reach the water.