If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
F**k OhVomit!
A silver lining in this cloud is that more people seem to becoming aware that the Crusades were an ultimately failed defensive war against the scourge of moslem murder, rape, conquest, plunder, and pillage (the five true pillars of islam).
bump
I am so very tempted to post this as a seperate thread:
We should use an Obama tactic.
Double down spreading the word about the Religion of Hatred that has infiltrated our country.
Free people do not allow Islam any foothold in their country.
i despise Islam. There. In fact when driving past a billboard yesterday about moohamed I flipped it the bird.
Off topic, please allow me just for a moment...when did “because of” become “because”? When did “in the hospital” become “in hospital”? When did “make a decision” become “take a decision”? End of interruption...sorry...thank you.
Obama and Islam, still sore that they got stopped at the gates of Vienna.
Brilliant. Ben is almost always spot on
The Crusades were a necessary response to the war Islam thrust upon the World.
I’ve never heard ISIS, al Qaeda or the Taliban refer to the USA as engaging in a new crusade. Leave it to our President to out propagandize our enemies.
Great Post. Thanks. What boggles my mind is how does one develop this kind of mindset? And how the hell did he become President? Man, did we get f#(%ed.
Ha haaaa! Yet another Ohola "red line" that has worked like a charm.
bttt
The Crusades were PUSHBACK.
Self-defense, long overdue...nothing more, nothing less.
Subject: Free Will
It’s interesting the way socialists approach theological concepts but when it comes to Islam they are not the only ones who refuse to approach the issue. That even includes leading Christian clergy including Pope Francis.
Followers of Mohammed not only claim, but truly believe that God has authorized them to kill those who refuse to submit to their version of God’s will. That is a basic tenet of that religion. A claim which goes unchallanged. While it’s understandable for atheists which most socialists are, not to approach that claim on a theological basis. It’s bewildering why any Christian clergy refuse to admit it even exists and is a basic part of Islam creed and worse yet are unable to condem its theological assertions.
The Koran which was not given to Mohammed by God but by some angel .Demanding enforcement of sharia law which draws heavily from the Torah.It is a pseudo religious concoction using monotheistic selected texts, taken and misconstrued from the old .(bible) and new tertaments. Both of which cite the Almighty has granted free will to accept or obey his laws and is the final judge not man. Sodom and Gormora , “Let he who is without sin cast the stone” are outstanding examples from both books. One deals with sin and God’s decision toward a group the other to an individual, neither is left to man.
Yet followers of Mohammed under the severest of penalties are forbidden to read either which would refute that assertion in a creed which institutionalizes disgusting arab tribal views, observances,and customs. Claiming adhearants are authorized by our Creator to demand submission to it or suffer an ignominious death administered by followers of Islam simply because they answer the call to prayer 5 times a day.
http://www.theusmat.com/islamandfreewill.htm
In direct response to Obama and his comment
“Unless we get on our high horse and think that this is unique to some other place..................”,
Our collective western civilization response is, Mr Obama, call it a high horse if you want to make excuses, but yes, we have risen above those acts you think we must, in our day, feel guilty for and feel so guilty now, after rising above them, that we are to excuse others for continuing to live that way, while we do not?? No, our moral horse does happen to be higher, higher than it once was and higher than the Islamist terrorists and the societies that breed them.
Yes Mr Obama, we can be and are proud we would not countenance slavery, or an inquisition, or racial or religious prejudice, or the lack of individual freedom of religion, or the lack of separation of church and state, or the joining of religious rules on blasphemy written into secular law, while many of those things ARE sought and practiced by the Islamists. You call it a high horse, but we simply call it progress, and its progress the Islamists are opposed to.