Posted on 02/13/2015 7:27:35 AM PST by Maceman
so in their minds it’s about standing, not the law?
/sigh
little libs and wishful thinking....
oh lordy. I guess would be ironic if a case about a technicality got thrown out on a technicality
For the progressives, EVERYTHING is about “standing”. In their minds, the ONLY folks who should have standing in a judicial proceeding are progressives.
Now there's a knee slapper.
New Rules: no one has standing for anything at any time.
“Most experts said the new evidence against the plaintiffs is likely not damning enough for the case to be dismissed outright. The case could still proceed if at least one of the plaintiffs could argue that ObamaCare would injure him or her. “
grasping at straws...there are millions of middle aged people and non-VA eligible citizens that have been damaged by the law...
I bet none of these experts would advocate nullifying Roe v Wade.
Standing when it suits them. Otherwise, who cares.
“ObamaCare fans: SCOTUS case ‘unraveling’”
Sounds familiar, haven’t we heard this before....let’s not count our chickens before they hatch.
Based on the current lib understanding of “standing”, shouldn’t Roe v. Wade be thrown out?
We've been working with Democratic Leaders Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid, key congressional leaders, and over 100 state lawmakers to make sure the Supreme Court hears their message: we were *there,* and this conservative lawsuit makes no sense.
Unbiased, impartial, disconnected and "amicus curiae" and all that bullshit. I guess it was this "The Hill" writer's turn in the barrel to carry the water and take one for the team.
Liberals are like muslims.
They make grand pronouncements with the intent of making their own reality.
If that is the case, then every lawsuit that a liberal group has filed over the past 20 years should be thrown out and every decision overturned with payments going to the aggrieved.
But, more importantly, it depends upon what the meaning of, ‘is’ is!
Hard to decide which I would like to see more: overthrow of Roe v. Wade or 0bamacare.
Both would be nice - pretty sure I won’t see either in my lifetime. :(
Standing argument gives Roberts just the excuse he needs to kick this to the curb.
Doesn’t matter that two are veterans. VA only covers service related health care issues. Unless you can prove it’s service related you have to have other coverage.
Leni
“the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center”
A classical oxymoron if ever there was one. The people who shred the Constitution daily in their never-ending quest to destroy it hide under the cover of an organization dedicated to making sure we are accountable to it. Leftists dissemble and lie to push the totalitarian agenda — that’s standard MO for commies.
Take a look at the facts of the "standing" of their favorite SCOTUS case ... Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe) in the infamous Roe v. Wade. Lying hypocritical bastards.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.