[Blueflag]

so in their minds it’s about standing, not the law?

/sigh

[C. Edmund Wright]

little libs and wishful thinking....

[babble-on]

oh lordy. I guess would be ironic if a case about a technicality got thrown out on a technicality

[House Atreides]

For the progressives, EVERYTHING is about “standing”. In their minds, the ONLY folks who should have standing in a judicial proceeding are progressives.

[skeeter]

...the progressive group Constitutional Accountability Center...

Now there's a knee slapper.

[exit82]

New Rules: no one has standing for anything at any time.

[God luvs America]

“Most experts said the new evidence against the plaintiffs is likely not damning enough for the case to be dismissed outright. The case could still proceed if at least one of the plaintiffs could argue that ObamaCare would injure him or her. “

---

grasping at straws...there are millions of middle aged people and non-VA eligible citizens that have been damaged by the law...

[ifinnegan]

I bet none of these experts would advocate nullifying Roe v Wade.

Standing when it suits them. Otherwise, who cares.

[kenmcg]

“ObamaCare fans: SCOTUS case ‘unraveling’”

Sounds familiar, haven’t we heard this before....let’s not count our chickens before they hatch.

[chrisser]

Based on the current lib understanding of “standing”, shouldn’t Roe v. Wade be thrown out?

[Gaffer]

From the Constitutional Accountability Center's Facebook page.

We've been working with Democratic Leaders Nancy Pelosi and Senator Harry Reid, key congressional leaders, and over 100 state lawmakers to make sure the Supreme Court hears their message: we were *there,* and this conservative lawsuit makes no sense.

Unbiased, impartial, disconnected and "amicus curiae" and all that bullshit. I guess it was this "The Hill" writer's turn in the barrel to carry the water and take one for the team.

[TheThirdRuffian]

Liberals are like muslims.

They make grand pronouncements with the intent of making their own reality.

[Diana in Wisconsin]

But, more importantly, it depends upon what the meaning of, ‘is’ is!

Hard to decide which I would like to see more: overthrow of Roe v. Wade or 0bamacare.

Both would be nice - pretty sure I won’t see either in my lifetime. :(

[DugwayDuke]

Doesn’t matter that two are veterans. VA only covers service related health care issues. Unless you can prove it’s service related you have to have other coverage.

[MinuteGal]

Rest assured that hordes of illegal aliens will shortly have legal and approved standing in every court in the good U.S.of A.......every time they sue on any thing....and in every venue from their local Tennis Court to the United States Supreme Court.

Leni

[ProtectOurFreedom]

“the progressive Constitutional Accountability Center”

A classical oxymoron if ever there was one. The people who shred the Constitution daily in their never-ending quest to destroy it hide under the cover of an organization dedicated to making sure we are accountable to it. Leftists dissemble and lie to push the totalitarian agenda — that’s standard MO for commies.

[Servant of the Cross]

When liberals can't win on the facts or merits of a case, they'll lamely attempt to malign the "standing" of their opponent.

Take a look at the facts of the "standing" of their favorite SCOTUS case ... Norma McCorvey (Jane Roe) in the infamous Roe v. Wade. Lying hypocritical bastards.

[Pollster1]

Other information that has emerged on the plaintiffs — such as reports that they have called Obama the “anti-Christ” and “the idiot in the White House” — also hasno relevance, legal experts said.

But that is relevant. Calling “the idiot in the White House” exactly that demonstrates the credibility of the plaintiffs. We know we can trust them to tell the truth.

[Vaduz]

ObamaCare = Illegal

[SoFloFreeper]

They wish. SCOTUS has already determined the plaintiffs have standing.