Don’t mess with the queer gestapo. Those are some wicked and evil bass turds.
What happened to the right to refuse service? The pendulum will swing back and perhaps the remaining will get back in closets with their disgusting behavior and acts.
I can’t help thinking that the U.S. is gonna fully deserve what will be done to them at the hands of the mozloid filth being imported en masse by the 0bimbo State Department.
The gays will be among the first to be thrown off buildings, burnt alive in cages, or having their heads slowly sawn off with rusty kitchen knives.
Someone should find a way to incite Muslims, in cases like these.
I for one, would love to see the “progressives” reaction to Muslims tossing a homosexual couple off of a roof in this country and stoning them, like they did in Syria.
Liberal dementia run amok.
So, let me get this... um.. straight... Any gay person walks into any business, they basically have a “right” to that businesses labor, regardless of any other considerations. The government is mandating this, therefore it is tyranny.
“People need to donate to this woman and help her”
I’m sure this scumbag Judge could attach the donations to the award. Now if the donations were made to an adult “Trustworthy” relative it might work.
Find a homosexual-owned flower shop and ask them to provide flowers for a “gay cleansing” prayer meeting.
Also, find a muslim restaurant that caters and tell them you want pulled pork for a southern-style bar mitzvah.
Where are the Westboro Baptists when you need them?
There is an unforgivable sin and it’s not murder. It’s thinking in an unapproved way. For that you lose everything.
I’m curious why defendant Stutzman’s name is mentioned several times- in most of these articles and most of these threads - but hardly ever the plaintiffs’ names, state Attorney General Bob Ferguson and the couple, Robert Ingersoll and Curt Freed, and the judge’s, Alexander Ekstrom.
Public accommodation emanates from the largess of the Federal Government.
So says the court system.
there comes a point when an armed response will be provoked by someone who see’s their future ripped from them
Probably the best thing an out of state organization can do is flood the state with pictures of the homosexual couple, with a warning to businesses to not provide any product or service to them, not because they are homosexuals, but because they are so litigious that it could ruin them as a business.
“These people are looking for an excuse to sue others into ruination. Refuse to provide them any product or service for your own protection, or it may cost you your business.”
From the article:
The Court found that “the Constitution and Canons of TEC have no provisions which state that a member diocese cannot voluntarily withdraw its membership.” The ruling found that had there been such a provision, it would have violated the Diocese’s “constitutionally-protected right” to freedom of association. “With the freedom to associate goes its corollary, the freedom to disassociate,” Judge Goodstein said.
This woman was exercising her freedom to disassociate when she chose not to sell flowers for a purpose she did not agree with.
She should take this to the Supreme Court on First Amendment grounds, as well as equal protection grounds. Apparently, South Carolina's freedom to disassociate is Washington's discrimination.
-PJ
“Stutzman did refer the couple to a different shop but that was not enough.”
It never is. The gaystapo will be satisfied with nothing less than the destruction of anyone who does not openly celebrate their perversion.
Terrorism.
If we donate now she is going to have to give it to the leftists terrorists.
Make a fund that supports her not in her name, and provide all the monies she needs until the courts are done, then give it to her.
Somebody needs to run the judge out of town on a rail.
Bookmark
What a free country. Perverts have more rights then honest folk. And before you start whining about the word pervert look it up.