Skip to comments.
Fears and cheers follow Target's plan to lay off 'several thousand' at headquarters
Pioneer Press ^
| 3-5-15
| tom webb
Posted on 03/05/2015 6:17:40 AM PST by TurboZamboni
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: minnesota_bound
41
posted on
03/05/2015 3:37:25 PM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Many years ago I started a new job at a magazine on the very day they let hundreds go, including five (5!) VPs. I honestly don’t think anyone noticed, in terms of productivity. That’s what happens when a company grows: little fiefdoms are built, and generally last well beyond their usefulness. Then someone wakes up...
42
posted on
03/05/2015 3:42:34 PM PST
by
EDINVA
To: CincyRichieRich
I doubt managers are in the union
43
posted on
03/05/2015 3:43:41 PM PST
by
TurboZamboni
(Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.-JFK)
To: A CA Guy
Obamacare, Obama economy, Obama hates businesses and has created anti-business laws they are responding to. Where have you been? Cutting headcount to goose the stock price has been corporate strategy for decades.
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...
45
posted on
03/06/2015 5:08:34 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW!)
To: DoodleDawg
Now though you cut head count to avoid paying for healthcare also.
46
posted on
03/06/2015 6:55:22 AM PST
by
A CA Guy
( God Bless America, God Bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
Now though you cut head count to avoid paying for healthcare also. We're not talking store employees. Headquarters people are likely salaried and had benefits long before Obamacare. They're cutting them for the same reason why corporations have been downsizing for years and years; because it looks good to the analysts, gives the appearance of reducing costs, and it bumps the stock price up. No other reasons than that.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson